Opportunistic AI-enabled automated bone mineral density measurements in lung cancer screening and coronary calcium scoring CT scans are equivalent

被引:7
|
作者
Naghavi, Morteza [1 ]
De Oliveira, Isabel [1 ]
Mao, Song Shou [2 ]
Jaberzadeh, Amirhossein [1 ]
Montoya, Juan [1 ]
Zhang, Chenyu [1 ]
Atlas, Kyle [1 ]
Manubolu, Venkat [2 ]
Montes, Marlon [1 ]
Li, Dong [3 ]
Atlas, Thomas [1 ]
Reeves, Anthony [5 ]
Henschke, Claudia [4 ]
Yankelevitz, David [4 ]
Budoff, Matthew [2 ]
机构
[1] TMC Innovat, HeartLung AI Technol, 2450 Holcomb Blvd, Houston, TX 77021 USA
[2] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Lundquist Inst, 1124 W Carson St, Torrance, CA 90502 USA
[3] Emory Univ, 201 Dowman Dr, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Mt Sinai, 1176 5th Ave,MC Level, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Cornell Univ, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Bone mineral density; Artificial intelligence; Deep learning; Opportunistic; Coronary artery calcium score; Quantitative computed tomography; Osteoporosis; Osteopenia; Cardiovascular Screening; Lung cancer screening; QUANTITATIVE COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; OSTEOPOROSIS; QCT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100492
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and objectives: We previously reported a novel manual method for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) in coronary artery calcium (CAC) scans and validated our method against Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA). Furthermore, we have developed and validated an artificial intelligence (AI) based automated BMD (AutoBMD) measurement as an opportunistic add-on to CAC scans that recently received FDA approval. In this report, we present evidence of equivalency between AutoBMD measurements in cardiac vs lung CT scans. Materials and methods: AI models were trained using 132 cases with 7649 (3 mm) slices for CAC, and 37 cases with 21918 (0.5 mm) slices for lung scans. To validate AutoBMD against manual measurements, we used 6776 cases of BMD measured manually on CAC scans in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). We then used 165 additional cases from Harbor UCLA Lundquist Institute to compare AutoBMD in patients who underwent both cardiac and lung scans on the same day. Results: Mean +/- SD for age was 69 +/- 9.4 years with 52.4% male. AutoBMD in lung and cardiac scans, and manual BMD in cardiac scans were 153.7 +/- 43.9, 155.1 +/- 44.4, and 163.6 +/- 45.3 g/cm3, respectively (p = 0.09). BlandAltman agreement analysis between AutoBMD lung and cardiac scans resulted in 1.37 g/cm3 mean differences. Pearson correlation coefficient between lung and cardiac AutoBMD was R2 = 0.95 (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Opportunistic BMD measurement using AutoBMD in CAC and lung cancer screening scans is promising and yields similar results. No extra radiation plus the high prevalence of asymptomatic osteoporosis makes AutoBMD an ideal screening tool for osteopenia and osteoporosis in CT scans done for other reasons.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] AI-Enabled Automated Cardiac Chambers Volumetry in ECGGated Coronary Calcium Scans vs. Non-Gated Lung Cancer Screening Scans
    Naghavi, Morteza
    Yankelevitz, David
    Reeves, Anthony
    Budoff, Matthew J.
    Zhang, Chenyu
    Atlas, Kyle
    Atlas, Thomas
    Henschke, Claudia
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [2] Opportunistic CT AI Screening for Low Bone Mineral Density
    Fahrenholtz, S.
    Banerjee, I.
    Tariq, A.
    Patel, B.
    Sensakovic, W.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E441 - E442
  • [3] Opportunistic Screening of Bone Mineral Density With CT Scans in Chronic Pancreatitis
    Manickavasagan, Hanisha
    Shah, Zarine
    Hart, Phil
    Lara, Luis
    Hinton, Alice
    Lu, Andrew
    Yadav, Dhiraj
    Conwell, Darwin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 114 : S70 - S70
  • [4] Opportunistic Screening of Bone Mineral Density With CT Scans in Chronic Pancreatitis
    Manickavasagan, H.
    Shah, Z. K.
    Lu, A.
    Lara, L.
    Hart, P. A.
    Yadav, D.
    Hinton, A.
    Conwell, D. L.
    [J]. PANCREAS, 2019, 48 (10) : 1485 - 1485
  • [5] Validation of Opportunistic Artificial Intelligence-Based Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Coronary Artery Calcium Scans
    Naghavi, Morteza
    Atlas, Kyle
    Jaberzadeh, Amirhossein
    Zhang, Chenyu
    Manubolu, Venkat
    Li, Dong
    Budoff, Matthew
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 21 (04) : 624 - 632
  • [6] Bone mineral density derived from cardiac CT scans: Using contrast enhanced scans for opportunistic screening
    Cheneymann, Andia
    Therkildsen, Josephine
    Winther, Simon
    Nissen, Louise
    Thygesen, Jesper
    Langdahl, Bente L.
    Hauge, Ellen-Margrethe
    Bottcher, Morten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2024, 27 (01)
  • [7] The Dubious Value of Coronary Calcium Scoring on Lung Cancer Screening CT
    Bernheim, Adam
    Auffermann, William F.
    Stillman, Arthur E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 14 (03) : 343 - 344
  • [8] Impact of 2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncardiac chest CT scans on lung cancer screening CT reporting
    Velangi, Pratik S.
    Kenny, Barrett
    Hooks, Matthew
    Kanda, Adinan
    Schertz, Kelsey
    Kharoud, Harmeet
    Sandhu, Gurmandeep S.
    Kalra, Rajat
    Allen, Tadashi
    Begnaud, Abbie
    Nijjar, Prabhjot Singh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2021, 37 (09): : 2777 - 2784
  • [9] Impact of 2016 SCCT/STR guidelines for coronary artery calcium scoring of noncardiac chest CT scans on lung cancer screening CT reporting
    Pratik S. Velangi
    Barrett Kenny
    Matthew Hooks
    Adinan Kanda
    Kelsey Schertz
    Harmeet Kharoud
    Gurmandeep S. Sandhu
    Rajat Kalra
    Tadashi Allen
    Abbie Begnaud
    Prabhjot Singh Nijjar
    [J]. The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2021, 37 : 2777 - 2784
  • [10] Deep-learning for Automated Volumetric Bone Mineral Density Measurement from Low-Dose Lung Cancer Screening CT scans: Comparison with DEXA
    Hatt, Charles
    Dyer, Debra
    Regan, Elizabeth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2023, 38 : 322 - 322