Assessing business process orientation using multi-criteria decision-making

被引:2
|
作者
Viegas, Renan Alves [1 ]
Costa, Ana Paula Cabral Seixas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Management Engn Dept, Res Grp Informat & Decis Syst GPSID, Recife, Brazil
关键词
Business process management; Business process maturity evaluation; Multi-criteria decision-making; Intuitionistic fuzzy sets; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; MATURITY MODELS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1108/BPMJ-07-2022-0357
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeOver the years, several business process management maturity models (BPM-MMs) have been proposed. Despite great advances, some issues concerning the effectiveness of their practical functionality still need to be addressed. These are related to three important aspects of BPM maturity assessment and improvement: their mechanisms for evaluating maturity (clarity, availability and accuracy), their flexibility (compliance) and their structure (path to maturity). The main goal with this article is to address such issues by introducing a new concept to evaluate and improve BPM maturity.Design/methodology/approachThe authors proceed in accordance with a design science research (DSR) integrating multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) with intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs).FindingsThe authors' proposal provides a practical BPM maturity framework and its assessment procedure to support organizations to determine and improve their initiatives appropriately, which means that it fully or partially addresses all the issues raised. To demonstrate the applicability of this framework, a real application was conducted, and a parallel between existing BPM-MMs is presented to emphasize its advances.Originality/valueIt is the first time that the MCDM approach has been used to support BPM maturity assessment. This approach not only takes into account the uncertainties and subjectivities inherent to this type of decision problem but also allows it to be treated quantitatively, thus making it possible to obtain more accurate results even with less experienced teams.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 368
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria decision-making process for buildings
    Barcomb, JD
    Curtner, A
    [J]. 35TH INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE & EXHIBIT (IECEC), VOLS 1 AND 2, TECHNICAL PAPERS, 2000, : 528 - 535
  • [2] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Encheva, Sylvia
    [J]. MICBE '09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 2009, : 192 - +
  • [3] Decision-making for multi-criteria optimization of process planning
    Arquis, Eric
    Delolme, Laurent
    Antomarchi, Anne-Lise
    Durieux, Séverine
    Duc, Emmanuel
    [J]. Mechanics and Industry, 2019, 20
  • [4] Structure of multi-criteria decision-making
    Brugha, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (11) : 1156 - 1168
  • [5] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141
  • [6] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Cansu Dağsuyu
    Ulviye Polat
    Ali Kokangül
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2021, 25 : 7169 - 7180
  • [7] Integrated process capability and multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Dagsuyu, Cansu
    Polat, Ulviye
    Kokangul, Ali
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (10) : 7169 - 7180
  • [8] A Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Ideal Business Location Identification
    Shaikh, Salman Ahmed
    Memon, Mohsin
    Kim, Kyoung-Sook
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (11):
  • [9] Assessing Complexity of Carbon Capture and Storage using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Sara, J.
    Stikkelman, R. M.
    Herder, P. M.
    [J]. 2015 9TH ANNUAL IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (SYSCON), 2015, : 145 - 152
  • [10] An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Evaluating Business Process Information Systems
    Kang, He-Yau
    Lee, Amy H., I
    Chan, Yao-Chuan
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2019, 7 (10)