How virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality facilitate teacher education: A systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Qin [1 ]
Li, Yanping [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Educ Psychol & Special Educ, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Humanities, 211 Huimin Rd, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
augmented reality; mixed reality; teacher education; virtual reality; SELF-EFFICACY; IMPACT; STUDENTS; DISPLAYS;
D O I
10.1111/jcal.12949
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundVirtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR) have sparked recently in improving the effectiveness of teacher education. However, there is a lack of review regarding the utilisation of these technologies in this field. These three technologies, namely VR, AR and MR, can be collectively referred to as extended reality (XR) (as mentioned in reference Tang et al., 2022).ObjectivesRemarkably, the utilisation of XR-based technologies in teacher education needs to be explored. Moreover, research questions related to the training objectives, methodological features, and the effects of XR-based teacher education remain unanswered.MethodsTo this end, the present study conducted a systematic review to analyse 52 articles from six databases (including Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ERIC, ScienceDirect, and ACM Digital Library).ResultsThe results indicate that XR technologies have been primarily used to train teachers' procedural knowledge, for instance, classroom management. Furthermore, most studies have primarily focused on pre-service teachers (PSTs) rather than in-service teachers and utilised small sample sizes, with VR emerging as the most frequently employed tool. Finally, the majority of the studies reported that XR-based training affected teachers positively.ConclusionsIt urges researchers and developers to consider theory-driven training design, which increases the potential to better understand what features of XR promote in-service teachers' and PSTs' learning and how they do so. This article additionally conducts a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis of XR-based teacher education to offer more insightful recommendations and foster further discussion. What is already known about this topicImplications for practice and/or policy Numerous empirical studies have shown the great potential of virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR) technologies utilised in teacher education. This rapidly growing field calls upon a synthesis of the use of extended reality (XR) technologies in teacher education.What this paper adds Presents a systematic review of XR-based teacher education, which provides a thorough overview of how previous research utilised XR technologies to promote teacher education. Conducted a SWOT analysis and pointed out the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of XR-based teacher education.A depth of understanding of previous research on this topic may enable educators to better plan and promote teacher education programs. It can guide researchers to optimise the multisensory immersion and interactivity of the virtual systems and platforms and develop suitable materials and tasks to be used in such learning environments.
引用
收藏
页码:1276 / 1294
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Hotspots and Trends of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality and Mixed Reality in Education Field
    Zhang, Hai
    Cui, Yulu
    Shan, Huaming
    Qu, Zhili
    Zhang, Wanxiong
    Tu, Lujie
    Wang, Yining
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IMMERSIVE LEARNING RESEARCH NETWORK (ILRN 2020), 2020, : 215 - 219
  • [2] A Systematic Review of the Design of Serious Games for Innovative Learning: Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, or Mixed Reality?
    Lee, Lap-Kei
    Wei, Xiaodong
    Chui, Kwok Tai
    Cheung, Simon K. S.
    Wang, Fu Lee
    Fung, Yin-Chun
    Lu, Angel
    Hui, Yan Keung
    Hao, Tianyong
    Hou, Leong U.
    Wu, Nga-In
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (05)
  • [3] APPLICATION OF VIRTUAL REALITY, AUGMENTED REALITY, AND MIXED REALITY IN MUSCULOSKELETAL UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL EDUCATION: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Chae, T.
    D'Amici, D.
    Leveille, L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 71 (01) : NP520 - NP520
  • [4] Augmented and Virtual Reality in Anatomical Education - A Systematic Review
    Uruthiralingam, Umaiyalini
    Rea, Paul M.
    [J]. BIOMEDICAL VISUALISATION, VOL 6, 2020, 1235 : 89 - 101
  • [5] Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Education
    Bazavan, Lidia-Cristina
    Roibu, Horatiu
    Besnea, Florina
    Cismaru, Stefan Irinel
    George, Bizdoaca Nicu
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 30TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR EDUCATION IN ELECTRICAL AND INFORMATION ENGINEERING (EAEEIE), 2021, : 82 - 85
  • [6] A literature review of augmented reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality in language learning
    Li, Kam Cheong
    Wong, Billy Tak-Ming
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOBILE LEARNING AND ORGANISATION, 2021, 15 (02) : 164 - 178
  • [7] Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) in Construction Education: A Systematic Literature Review
    Kline, Andrew R.
    Ayer, Steven K.
    [J]. COMPUTING IN CIVIL ENGINEERING 2023-VISUALIZATION, INFORMATION MODELING, AND SIMULATION, 2024, : 655 - 662
  • [8] Virtual reality and augmented reality in medical education: an umbrella review
    Tene, Talia
    Lopez, Diego Fabian Vique
    Aguirre, Paulina Elizabeth Valverde
    Puente, Luz Maria Orna
    Gomez, Cristian Vacacela
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN DIGITAL HEALTH, 2024, 6
  • [9] Material Attribute Estimation as Part of Telecommunication Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Mixed Reality System: Systematic Review
    Christoff, Nicole
    Tonchev, Krasimir
    [J]. ELECTRONICS, 2024, 13 (13)
  • [10] Enhancing Reality: A Systematic Review of Augmented Reality in Neuronavigation and Education
    Cho, James
    Rahimpour, Shervin
    Cutler, Andrew
    Goodwin, C. Rory
    Lad, Shivanand P.
    Codd, Patrick
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 139 : 186 - 195