High-flow oxygen therapy versus facemask preoxygenation in anticipated difficult airway management (PREOPTI-DAM): an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled phase 3 trial

Background Difficult airway management remains a critical procedure with life-threatening adverse events. Current guidelines suggest high-flow therapy by nasal cannulae (HFNC) as a preoxygenation device in this setting. However, there is an evidence gap to support this recommendation.Methods The PREOPTI-DAM study is an open-label, single-centre, randomised controlled phase 3 trial done at Nantes University Hospital, France. Patients were aged 18-90 years with one major or two minor criteria of anticipated difficult airway management, and requiring intubation for scheduled surgery, were eligible. Patients with body mass index >35 kg/m2 were excluded. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive 4-min preoxygenation by HFNC or facemask. Randomisation was stratified according to the intubation strategy (laryngoscopic versus fiberoptic intubation). The primary outcome was the incidence of oxygen desaturation & LE;94% or of bag-mask ventilation during intubation. The primary and safety analyses included the intention to treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03604120) and EudraCT (2018-A00434-51).Findings From September 4 2018 to March 31 2021, 186 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. One participant withdrew consent and 185 (99.5%) were included in the primary analysis (HFNC, N = 95; Facemask, N = 90). The incidence of the primary outcome was not significantly different between the HFNC and the facemask groups, respectively 2 (2%) versus 7 (8%); adjusted difference, -5.6 [95% confidence interval (CI), -11.8 to 0.6], P = 0.10. In the HFNC group, 76 patients (80%) versus 53 (59%) in the facemask group, reported good or excellent intubation experiences; adjusted difference 20.5 [95% CI, 8.3-32.8], P = 0.016. Comparing HFNC with facemask, severe complication occurred in 22 (23%) versus 27 (30%) patients (P = 0.29), and moderate complication in 14 (15%) versus 18 (20%) patients (P = 0.35). No death or cardiac arrest occurred during the study.Interpretation Compared with facemask, HFNC did not significantly reduce the incidence of desaturation & LE;94% or bag-mask ventilation during anticipated difficult intubation but the trial was underpowered to rule out a clinically significant benefit. Patient satisfaction was improved with HFNC.