The unintended consequences of exemptions in conservation and management measures for fisheries management

被引:0
|
作者
Haas, Bianca [1 ,2 ]
Azmi, Kamal [1 ]
Hanich, Quentin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Australian Natl Ctr Ocean Resources & Secur ANCORS, Ocean Nexus, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Australian Natl Ctr Ocean Resources & Secur ANCORS, Wollongong, NSW 2500, Australia
关键词
Ocean governance; Pacific ocean; Resource management; Tuna fishery; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106544
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
The duty to recognize the special requirements of developing states, and ensure that conservation and man-agement measures avoid placing a disproportionate burden on them, has been firmly anchored in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the United Nations Fish Stocks Agreement. Coastal developing states, particularly small island developing states (SIDS), are often economically and socially dependent on marine resources, and their development aspirations have been recognized by the international community. Ideally, members of regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) will meet their duty to avoid placing a disproportionate conservation burden on SIDS by designing and agreeing upon conservation and management measures that are equitable in terms of both their ease of implementation and their substantive impact on each participating state, such as through the equitable allocation of fishing opportunities. Where RFMOs are unable to adopt equitable measures, they may rely on the use of exemptions from conservation and management measures for developing states as a second-best alternative. However, exemptions have the potential to threaten the sustainability of the respective target stocks by creating loopholes in catch and effort limits. They can also un-dermine the scarcity value created by strong catch and effort limits, which can generate higher access fees for SIDS. In this paper, we analysed the conservation and management measures of RFMOs that include exemptions from catch, effort and capacity limits and found that they are used most commonly in the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission. We argue that the use of exemptions due to the failure of RFMOs to adopt equitable allocation frameworks has the potential to negatively impact marine resources and their development oppor-tunities. Instead, alternatives, such as equitable allocations of science-based catch and effort limits, trans-ferability and phased adjustments, should be developed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transparency in fisheries conservation and management measures
    Davis, Ruth A.
    Hanich, Quentin
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2022, 136
  • [2] Unintended consequences of climate-adaptive fisheries management targets
    Szuwalski, Cody S.
    Hollowed, Anne B.
    Holsman, Kirstin K.
    Ianelli, James N.
    Legault, Christopher M.
    Melnychuk, Michael C.
    Ovando, Dan
    Punt, Andre E.
    [J]. FISH AND FISHERIES, 2023, 24 (03) : 439 - 453
  • [3] DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF MALAYSIAN MARINE FISHERIES - TECHNICAL CONSERVATION MEASURES
    SAHARUDDIN, AH
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 1995, 19 (02) : 115 - 126
  • [4] Conservation practice effectiveness and adoption: unintended consequences and implications for sustainable phosphorus management
    Dodd, R. J.
    Sharpley, A. N.
    [J]. NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2016, 104 (03) : 373 - 392
  • [5] Evaluating unintended consequences of intentional species introductions and eradications for improved conservation management
    Pearson, Dean E.
    Clark, Tyler J.
    Hahn, Philip G.
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2022, 36 (01)
  • [6] Conservation practice effectiveness and adoption: unintended consequences and implications for sustainable phosphorus management
    R. J. Dodd
    A. N. Sharpley
    [J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2016, 104 : 373 - 392
  • [7] Fisheries management and conservation overview
    Cowan, James H., Jr.
    [J]. RED SNAPPER ECOLOGY AND FISHERIES IN THE U.S. GULF OF MEXICO, 2007, 60 : 263 - 265
  • [8] Species management leads to unintended consequences
    Gewin, Virginia
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 9 (08) : 427 - 427
  • [9] Evidence of rebound effect in New Zealand MPAs: Unintended consequences of spatial management measures
    Lohrer, Tai
    Hewitt, Judi E.
    Lohrer, Andrew M.
    Parsons, Darren M.
    Ellis, Joanne I.
    Stephenson, Fabrice
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 239
  • [10] Unintended effects of single-species fisheries management
    Tolotti, Mariana
    Guillotreau, Patrice
    Forget, Fabien
    Capello, Manuela
    Dagorn, Laurent
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (09) : 9227 - 9250