People Think That Social Media Platforms Do (but Should Not) Amplify Divisive Content

被引:11
|
作者
Rathje, Steve [1 ,2 ]
Robertson, Claire [1 ,2 ]
Brady, William J. [3 ]
Van Bavel, Jay J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Psychol &, New York, NY 10012 USA
[2] NYU, Ctr Neural Sci, New York, NY 10012 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Evanston, IL USA
关键词
algorithms; social media; virality; misinformation; polarization; FAKE NEWS; POLARIZATION; PSYCHOLOGY; ALGORITHMS; TWITTER; SCIENCE; SHAPES;
D O I
10.1177/17456916231190392
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent studies have documented the type of content that is most likely to spread widely, or go "viral," on social media, yet little is known about people's perceptions of what goes viral or what should go viral. This is critical to understand because there is widespread debate about how to improve or regulate social media algorithms. We recruited a sample of participants that is nationally representative of the U.S. population (according to age, gender, and race/ethnicity) and surveyed them about their perceptions of social media virality (n = 511). In line with prior research, people believe that divisive content, moral outrage, negative content, high-arousal content, and misinformation are all likely to go viral online. However, they reported that this type of content should not go viral on social media. Instead, people reported that many forms of positive content-such as accurate content, nuanced content, and educational content-are not likely to go viral even though they think this content should go viral. These perceptions were shared among most participants and were only weakly related to political orientation, social media usage, and demographic variables. In sum, there is broad consensus around the type of content people think social media platforms should and should not amplify, which can help inform solutions for improving social media.
引用
收藏
页码:781 / 795
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Engagement, user satisfaction, and the amplification of divisive content on social media
    Milli, Smitha
    Carroll, Micah
    Wang, Yike
    Pandey, Sashrika
    Zhao, Sebastian
    Dragan, Anca D.
    PNAS NEXUS, 2025, 4 (03):
  • [2] Why do people think that others should earn this or that?
    Sznycer, Daniel
    Ermer, Elsa
    Tooby, John
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2018, 41
  • [3] Why Do People Choose Different Social Media Platforms? Linking Use Motives With Social Media Affordances and Personalities
    Chen, Meng
    Peng, Altman Yuzhu
    SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2023, 41 (02) : 330 - 352
  • [4] Should Social Media Censor Content?
    Loria, Keith
    ECONTENT, 2014, 37 (09) : 6 - 8
  • [5] Content moderation and advertising in social media platforms
    Madio, Leonardo
    Quinn, Martin
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2024,
  • [6] Reflection of people's professions on social media platforms
    Dagistanli, Omer
    Erbay, Hasan
    Kor, Hakan
    Yurttakal, Ahmet Hasim
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2023, 35 (07): : 5575 - 5586
  • [7] Reflection of people’s professions on social media platforms
    Ömer Dağıstanlı
    Hasan Erbay
    Hakan Kör
    Ahmet Haşim Yurttakal
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2023, 35 : 5575 - 5586
  • [8] Network Overlap and Content Sharing on Social Media Platforms
    Peng, Jing
    Agarwal, Ashish
    Hosanagar, Kartik
    Iyengar, Raghuram
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2018, 55 (04) : 571 - 585
  • [9] TO WHOM DO PEOPLE THINK REPRESENTATIVES SHOULD RESPOND: THEIR DISTRICT OR THE COUNTRY?
    Doherty, David
    PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2013, 77 (01) : 237 - 255
  • [10] Network Size and Content Generation on Social Media Platforms
    Wei, Zaiyan
    Xiao, Mo
    Rong, Rong
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2021, 30 (05) : 1406 - 1426