Routine screening of abnormal vaginal flora during pregnancy reduces the odds of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Hoffmann, Eszter [1 ,2 ]
Vancsa, Szilard [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Varadi, Alex [3 ]
Hegyi, Peter [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Nagy, Rita [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Hamar, Balazs [1 ,2 ]
Futacs, Vanda [1 ]
Kepkep, Beguem [1 ]
Nyirady, Peter [2 ,6 ]
Demendi, Csaba [1 ,2 ]
Acs, Nandor [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Semmelweis Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ulloi Ut 78-A, H-1082 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Semmelweis Univ, Ctr Translat Med, Budapest, Hungary
[3] Univ Pecs, Inst Translat Med, Med Sch, Pecs, Hungary
[4] Semmelweis Univ, Div Pancreat Dis, Heart & Vasc Ctr, Budapest, Hungary
[5] Heim Pal Natl Pediat Inst, Budapest, Hungary
[6] Semmelweis Univ, Dept Urol, Budapest, Hungary
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
BACTERIAL VAGINOSIS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; CERVICAL LENGTH; TREAT PROGRAM; DELIVERY; WOMEN; INFECTION; PH; METRONIDAZOLE; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-40993-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Prematurity is the leading cause of perinatal mortality and the morbidity among children under the age of 5. The prevalence of preterm birth is between 5 and 18% worldwide. Approximately 30% of preterm deliveries occur as a consequence of fetal or maternal infections. Bacterial vaginosis can increase the risk of ascending infections. However, there is no recommendation or protocol for screening of abnormal vaginal flora. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effectiveness of routine screening of abnormal vaginal flora during pregnancy care. We conducted our systematic search in the following databases: MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Studies reporting on pregnant women with no symptoms of bacterial vaginosis were included in our analysis if they provided data on the outcome of their pregnancy. The intervention group went through screening of abnormal vaginal flora in addition to routine pregnancy care. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was used as effect size measure. From each study the total number of patients and number of events was extracted in both the intervention and control arm to calculate OR. Altogether we included 13 trials with 143,534 patients. The screening methods were Gram stain, pH screening, pH self-screening and pH screening combined with Gram stain. Regular screening of vaginal flora compared to no screening significantly reduces the odds of preterm birth before 37 weeks (8.98% vs 9.42%; OR 0.71, CI 0.57-0.87), birthweight under 2500 g (6.53% vs 7.24%; OR 0.64, CI 0.50-0.81), preterm birth before 32 weeks (1.35% vs 2.03%; OR 0.51, CI 0.31-0.85) and birthweight under 1000 g (0.86% vs 2.2%; OR 0.33, CI 0.19-0.57). In conclusion, the routine screening of abnormal vaginal flora might prevent preterm birth, extreme preterm birth, low birthweight deliveries and very low birthweight deliveries. Further research is needed to assess the problem more accurately.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Routine screening of abnormal vaginal flora during pregnancy reduces the odds of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Eszter Hoffmann
    Szilárd Váncsa
    Alex Váradi
    Péter Hegyi
    Rita Nagy
    Balázs Hamar
    Vanda Futács
    Begüm Kepkep
    Péter Nyirády
    Csaba Demendi
    Nándor Ács
    Scientific Reports, 13 (1)
  • [2] Preterm Birth and Social Support during Pregnancy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hetherington, Erin
    Doktorchik, Chelsea
    Premji, Shahirose S.
    McDonald, Sheila W.
    Tough, Suzanne C.
    Sauve, Reg S.
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 29 (06) : 523 - 535
  • [3] Treatment of abnormal vaginal flora in early pregnancy with clindamycin for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth: a systematic review and metaanalysis
    Lamont, Ronald F.
    Nhan-Chang, Chia-Ling
    Sobel, Jack D.
    Workowski, Kimberly
    Conde-Agudelo, Agustin
    Romero, Roberto
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 205 (03) : 177 - 190
  • [4] Ozone exposure during early pregnancy and preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rappazzo, Kristen M.
    Nichols, Jennifer L.
    Rice, R. Byron
    Luben, Thomas J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 198
  • [5] Preterm Birth and Antidepressant Medication Use during Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Huybrechts, Krista F.
    Sanghani, Reesha Shah
    Avorn, Jerry
    Urato, Adam C.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):
  • [6] The vaginal microbiome and the risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Gudnadottir, Unnur
    Debelius, Justine W.
    Du, Juan
    Hugerth, Luisa W.
    Danielsson, Hanna
    Schuppe-Koistinen, Ina
    Fransson, Emma
    Brusselaers, Nele
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [7] Treatment of vaginal candidiasis for the prevention of preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Roberts C.L.
    Algert C.S.
    Rickard K.L.
    Morris J.M.
    Systematic Reviews, 4 (1)
  • [8] The vaginal microbiome and the risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Unnur Gudnadottir
    Justine W. Debelius
    Juan Du
    Luisa W. Hugerth
    Hanna Danielsson
    Ina Schuppe-Koistinen
    Emma Fransson
    Nele Brusselaers
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [9] The relationship between maternal anemia during pregnancy with preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rahmati, Shoboo
    Azami, Milad
    Badfar, Gholamreza
    Parizad, Naser
    Sayehmiri, Kourosh
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (15): : 2679 - 2689
  • [10] Supplementation of Omega 3 during Pregnancy and the Risk of Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Serra, Ramon
    Penailillo, Reyna
    Monteiro, Lara J.
    Monckeberg, Max
    Pena, Macarena
    Moyano, Lia
    Brunner, Camila
    Vega, Georgina
    Choolani, Mahesh
    Illanes, Sebastian E.
    NUTRIENTS, 2021, 13 (05)