The role of multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Jung, Nathan [1 ]
DiNatale, Renzo G. [1 ]
Frankel, Jason [2 ]
Koenig, Hannah [1 ]
Ho, On [1 ]
Flores, John Paul [3 ]
Porter, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol & Renal Transplantat Serv, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] SLU Care Urol, Urol, 6400 Clayton Rd, Clayton, MO 63177 USA
[3] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Dept Med, Hematol & Oncol Serv, 1100 Ninth Ave, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
关键词
Imaging-guided biopsy; Multiparametric MRI; Prostate cancer; Sensitivity and specificity; Ultrasonography; SHEAR-WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; TARGETED BIOPSY; LESIONS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-022-04122-z
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose Transrectal ultrasound (US) imaging is paramount to the successful completion of prostate biopsies. Certain US features have been associated with prostate cancer (PCa), but their utility remains controversial. We explored the role of multiparametric US (mpUS) in the detection of clinically significant PCa. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study to contrast the findings of prostate MRI and mpUS. Patients who underwent MRI, US and biopsy between 2015 and 2021 were included. Biopsies were performed using a systematic approach (12 cores), as well as with MRI (4 cores/lesion) and US (1 core/lesion) targeting. The US features analyzed consisted of: calcifications, hypoechoic lesions and power or color Doppler positivity. Gleason 3 + 4 or higher was used as to define true positives. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated for the different imaging modalities. Results The final cohort included 74 patients, of which 24 (32.4%) had clinically significant PCa. The concordance between MRI and US was 63.5%. Seven individuals with discordant results had clinically significant PCa. MRI alone was more sensitive (87.5% vs 75%) but less specific (28% vs 32%) than US alone. An all-inclusive approach considering any suspicious US or MRI finding had a sensitivity of 95.8%. A more restrictive approach, targeting lesions noted in both US and MRI, yielded the highest specificity (50.0%) and accuracy (55.4%). Conclusion Biopsy targeting based on US findings can provide additional diagnostic information that may increase sensitivity or specificity. Additional research into this topic could open the door to a more personalized approach to prostate biopsy.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 671
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The role of multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Nathan Jung
    Renzo G. DiNatale
    Jason Frankel
    Hannah Koenig
    On Ho
    John Paul Flores
    Christopher Porter
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 663 - 671
  • [2] THE ROLE OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI IN DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Fiori, Cristian
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Grande, Susanna
    Poggio, Massimiliano
    Cattaneo, Giovanni
    Bollito, Enrico
    Papotti, Mauro
    Russo, Filippo
    Regge, Daniele
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E906 - E907
  • [3] Multiparametric MRI in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2017, 18 (04) : 597 - 606
  • [4] Can transrectal prostate ultrasound compete with multiparametric MRI in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer?
    Grey, Alistair D. R.
    Connor, Martin J.
    Tam, Joseph
    Loch, Tillmann
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (03) : 1492 - 1500
  • [5] DETECTION OF CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCER: A COMPARISON OF MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI AND PROSTATE BIOPSY
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Fiori, Cristian
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Grande, Susanna
    Cossu, Marco
    Cattaneo, Giovanni
    Bollito, Enrico
    Papotti, Mauro
    Russo, Filippo
    Regge, Daniele
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (05) : 2324 - 2325
  • [6] The role of artificial intelligence for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
    Quarta, L.
    Scuderi, S.
    Gandaglia, G.
    Stabile, A.
    Marzorati, C.
    Russo, T.
    Brembilla, G.
    Camisassa, E.
    Leni, R.
    Cucchiara, V.
    Bianchi, M.
    Cannoletta, D.
    Zaurito, P.
    Barletta, F.
    Cosenza, M.
    Robesti, D.
    Mazzone, E.
    De Cobelli, F.
    Montorsi, F.
    Briganti, A.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S61 - S61
  • [7] Precision of multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of clinically significant Prostate Cancer
    Krafft, U.
    Borkowetz, A.
    UROLOGE, 2020, 59 (01): : 72 - 77
  • [8] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Transperineal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy in Smaller Prostate
    Wu, Shulin
    Dahl, Douglas
    Kim, Michelle
    Lin, Sharron
    Crotty, Rory
    Cornejo, Kristine
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    Feldman, Adam
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2022, 102 (SUPPL 1) : 697 - 698
  • [9] Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer by Transperineal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy in Smaller Prostate
    Wu, Shulin
    Dahl, Douglas
    Kim, Michelle
    Lin, Sharron
    Crotty, Rory
    Cornejo, Kristine
    Harisinghani, Mukesh
    Feldman, Adam
    Wu, Chin-Lee
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2022, 35 (SUPPL 2) : 697 - 698
  • [10] Optimizing multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsies and detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: The role of perilesional sampling
    Noujeim, J- P.
    Belahsen, Y.
    Martin, R.
    Lefebvre, Y.
    Lemort, M.
    Deforche, M.
    Sirtaine, N.
    Roumeguere, T.
    Peltier, A.
    Diamand, R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 : S249 - S250