Gap between knowledge and action: understanding the consistency of farmers' ecological cognition and green production behavior in Hainan Province, China

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Weiqin [1 ]
Qiao, Dan [1 ]
Hao, Qinchuan [1 ]
Ji, Yifan [1 ]
Chen, Donghui [1 ]
Xu, Tao [1 ]
机构
[1] Hainan Univ, Int Business Sch, 58 Renmin Ave, Haikou 570228, Hainan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cognition; Behavior; Consistency; Farmers; Green production; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ADOPTION; DECISION;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-024-04464-1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The pivotal role of greening production methods is indispensable in facilitating the sustainable development of China's agricultural sector and its modernization process. Translating farmers' ecological cognition into environmentally conscious production behavior constitutes a fundamental strategy for advancing the green transformation within China's agriculture. However, a recurrent issue arises from an inconsistency between farmers' green production behavior and their ecological cognition. Meanwhile, the current research has fewer studies on the consistency of farmers' cognition and behavior, and more analysis of the logical hierarchical relationship between their influencing factors needs to be done. Based on a field survey of 399 farmers in Hainan Province, this paper first employs descriptive statistics to assess the consistency of farmers' ecological cognition with their green production behavior. Second, this study uses a Logistic model and Interpretative Structural Model (ISM) to empirically analyze the factors influencing such consistency and the internal logical relationships of these factors. The results reveal that merely 28% of farmers exhibit consistency between their ecological cognition and green production practices. Secondly, education level, health status, political capital, household expenditure, planting scales, risk preference, peer influences, policy cognition, social networks, and information acquisition significantly influence this "consistency." Thirdly, the logical hierarchical relationships established via the ISM indicate that peer influences and risk preference are the surface direct factors; policy cognition, information acquisition, social networks, and planting scales are middle indirect factors; education level, political capital, health status, and household expenditure are deep-rooted factors that underpin the entire framework. Given these insights, this study recommends that the government undertake initiatives to reinforce education and training programs, enhance accessibility to information and technical support, and tailor policies to accommodate small-scale farmers. This study endeavor contributes to an enhanced comprehension of the factors influencing the transformation of farmers' ecological cognition into green production behavior, also presenting pragmatic policy proposals to advance sustainable agriculture in China.
引用
收藏
页码:31251 / 31275
页数:25
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] Gap between Willingness and Behaviors: Understanding the Consistency of Farmers' Green Production in Hainan, China
    Qiao, Dan
    Xu, Shuting
    Xu, Tao
    Hao, Qinchuan
    Zhong, Zhen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (18)
  • [2] Livelihood Capital, Ecological Cognition, and Farmers' Green Production Behavior
    Ren, Jianhua
    Lei, Hongzhen
    Ren, Haiyun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (24)
  • [3] Gap between words and action: empirical study on the consistency of farmers supporting green vegetable production practices
    Li, Bo
    Liao, Mengjie
    Yuan, Junjing
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
  • [4] Understanding the differences in cultivated land protection behaviors between smallholders and professional farmers in Hainan Province, China
    Xu, Tao
    Chen, Haojie
    Ji, Yifan
    Qiao, Dan
    Wang, Fang
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
  • [5] The Impact of Digital Literacy on Farmers' Green Production Behavior: Mediating Effects Based on Ecological Cognition
    Liu, Xiao
    Wang, Zhenyu
    Han, Xiaoyan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (17)
  • [6] How Does Capital Endowment Impact Farmers' Green Production Behavior? Perspectives on Ecological Cognition and Environmental Regulation
    Xu, Xuezhen
    Wang, Fang
    Xu, Tao
    Khan, Sufyan Ullah
    LAND, 2023, 12 (08)
  • [7] Can government regulation weak the gap between green production intention and behavior? Based on the perspective of farmers' perceptions
    Yang, Chenyujing
    Liang, Xiaomeng
    Xue, Yanjin
    Zhang, Yuan yuan
    Xue, Yongji
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 434
  • [8] Can Internet Use Narrow the Gap between Farmers' Willingness and Behavior in Waste Classification? Empirical Evidence from Rural Areas in Jiangsu Province, China
    Cui, Wenchao
    Chen, Yanjun
    Zeng, Hengyuan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [9] Knowledge and Farmers' Adoption of Green Production Technologies: An Empirical Study on IPM Adoption Intention in Major Indica-Rice-Producing Areas in the Anhui Province of China
    Sun, Xiaolong
    Lyu, Jing
    Ge, Candi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)