In-Person or Online? Exploring Student Pharmacists' Perceived Change in Interprofessional Skills between Two Delivery Formats

被引:2
|
作者
Van Hooser, Jared [1 ]
Olson, Anthony W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Coll Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice & Pharmaceut Sci, Duluth, MN 55812 USA
[2] Essentia Inst Rural Hlth, Duluth, MN 55805 USA
关键词
pharmacy education; interprofessional education (IPE); simulations; remote learning; experiential learning; COVID-19; simulation; standardized patients; VALIDATION;
D O I
10.3390/pharmacy11020055
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic drastically changed how education is delivered. Many academic programs quickly transformed their curriculum to online distance learning. This rapid transition may have compromised the rigor and fidelity of these activities. The Interprofessional Standardized Patient Experience (ISPE) is an interprofessional education activity (IPE) involving a team of students from six different healthcare professions that switched to an online delivery format. This manuscript compares pharmacy students' perceived change in interprofessional skills between the two formats. Following the ISPE, second-year pharmacy students completed the revised Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Survey (ICCAS-R). The ICCAS-R assesses the change in interprofessional collaboration-related competencies in healthcare students before and after IPE training using a retrospective pre-post approach. For each ICCAS-R item and each delivery format (44 in-person and 51 online), paired Student's t-test on pre- and post-ISPE scores, and Cohen's d were calculated. Every item of the ICCAS-R was significant (p < 0.001), regardless of delivery format. Nearly all ICCAS-R items had a large effect size, and the remaining items had a medium effect size. The amount of change pre- and post-ISPE for each ICCAS-R item was calculated. Student's t-test was used to compare the magnitude of change in interprofessional skills between the two delivery formats. Only one difference was noted between the two delivery formats-ICCAS-R item 16, which measured actively listening to interprofessional team members (p = 0.0321). When switching to an online format, the high-fidelity dimension of the ISPE was retained. The ISPE is an effective IPE activity at increasing pharmacy students' self-perceived interprofessional collaboration skills regardless of delivery format. Even though students reported the ISPE increased their ability to actively listen to the perspectives of interprofessional team members in both formats, the magnitude of the benefit was more profound in the in-person group.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Is Online Treatment as Effective as In-Person Treatment? Psychological Change in Two Relationship Skills Groups
    Church, Dawson
    Clond, Morgan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2019, 207 (05) : 315 - 319
  • [2] Exploring the difference in participants' factual knowledge between online and in-person survey modes
    Burnett, Craig M.
    [J]. RESEARCH & POLITICS, 2016, 3 (02):
  • [3] Interprofessional team-based education: A comparison of in-person and online learner experiences by method of delivery and health profession
    Shorten, Allison
    Shorten, Brett
    Bosworth, Peter
    Camp, Shelly
    House, David
    Somerall, William
    Watts, Penni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING, 2023, 44 : 26 - 32
  • [4] Exploring the Role of In-Person Components for Online Health Behavior Change Interventions: Can a Digital Person-to-Person Component Suffice?
    Santarossa, Sara
    Kane, Deborah
    Senn, Charlene Y.
    Woodruff, Sarah J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2018, 20 (04)
  • [5] Impact and Efficiency of Treatment Across Two PTSD Clinical Trials Comparing In-Person and Telehealth Service Delivery Formats
    McGeary, Cindy M. A.
    Morland, Leslie A. A.
    Resick, Patricia A. A.
    Straud, Casey L. L.
    Moring, John C. C.
    Sohn, Min Ji
    Mackintosh, Margaret-Anne
    Young-McCaughan, Stacey
    Acierno, Ron
    Rauch, Sheila A. M.
    Mintz, Jim
    McGeary, Donald D. D.
    Wells, Stephanie Y. Y.
    Grubbs, Kathleen
    Nabity, Paul S. S.
    McMahon, Chelsea J. J.
    Litz, Brett T. T.
    Velligan, Dawn I. I.
    Macdonald, Alexandra
    Mata-Galan, Emma
    Holliday, Stephen L. L.
    Dillon, Kirsten H. H.
    Roache, John D. D.
    Peterson, Alan L. L.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES, 2024, 21 (01) : 73 - 81
  • [6] The transition from in-person to online supervision: Does the interaction between doctoral advisors and candidates change?
    Torka, Marc
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 58 (06) : 659 - 671
  • [7] Shifting to the online environment: exploring virtual and in-person collaborations between community college libraries and writing centers
    Stone, Julia
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2024, 50 (05):
  • [8] Challenges in addressing student difficulties with basics and change of basis for two-state quantum systems using a multiple-choice question sequence in online and in-person classes
    Hu, Peter
    Li, Yangqiuting
    Singh, Chandralekha
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2023, 44 (06)
  • [9] What's different about digital? A qualitative interview study exploring experiences of adapting in-person behaviour change interventions for digital delivery
    Cooney, Eva
    Toomey, Elaine
    Ryan, Kathleen
    Meade, Oonagh
    McSharry, Jenny
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [10] Developing as health professionals through community volunteering: exploring the value of a partnership between medical students and primary schools online compared to in-person
    Alexandra M. Cardoso Pinto
    Sajan B. Patel
    Morwenna Stephens
    Payal Guha
    Ana Baptista
    Susan Smith
    [J]. BMC Medical Education, 23