Whole biomass material envelope system for nearly-zero energy houses: Carbon footprint and construction cost assessment

被引:4
|
作者
Yan, Shurui [1 ,4 ]
Shi, Feng [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zheng, Chenyuan [2 ,4 ]
Ma, Yongchao [2 ]
Huang, Jingjing [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Sch Sci Human Habitat, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[2] Xiamen Univ, Sch Architecture & Civil Engn, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
[3] South China Univ Technol, State Key Lab Subtrop Bldg & Urban Sci, Guangzhou 510641, Peoples R China
[4] Xiamen Univ, Fujian Prov Univ Key Lab Intelligent & Low Carbon, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China
来源
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Whole biomass material; Straw bale; Building envelope; Nearly -zero energy house; Carbon footprint; Construction cost; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; STRAW BALE WALL; EMISSIONS ASSESSMENT; RESIDENTIAL SECTOR; PERFORMANCE; BUILDINGS; DESIGN; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108757
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Building envelopes have the potential to achieve energy savings of between 28% and 66%, and a reliable building envelope system can effectively reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions. This study proposed a whole biomass material envelope system (WBMES) for nearly -zero energy (NZE) houses. The construction materials of the WBMES are primarily biomass materials such as straw bale, wood, and bamboo. An NZE house was selected as a case study. According to the calculation results, the carbon footprint of the case was 326.54 kgCO2/m2, 14.24 kgCO2/m2, and 35.55 kgCO2/m2 center dot a in the material production, transportation, and operational stages, respectively. Compared with other cases found in other studies (including NZE and nonNZE buildings), the case house ranked well in reducing carbon emissions in the material production stage. However, it could only maintain the carbon emissions of the operational stages at an average level. According to the detailed simulation results from EnergyPlus, the airtightness and roof were the weakest parts of the heat balance and required strengthening. Meanwhile, the case study house had a low cost of $535.7/m2, similar to that of a typical building. Hence, the WBMES has good carbon reduction potential and low construction costs. It is suitable for construction in agricultural or undeveloped districts to reduce carbon emissions while maintaining construction costs at a low level.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Nearly-Zero Energy Buildings: Cost-Optimal Analysis of Building Envelope Characteristics
    Loukaidou, K.
    Michopoulos, A.
    Zachariadis, Th.
    SUSTAINABLE SYNERGIES FROM BUILDINGS TO THE URBAN SCALE, 2017, 38 : 20 - 27
  • [2] Straw bale construction towards nearly-zero energy building design with low carbon emission in northern China
    Bo, Rui
    Zhang, Hongrui
    Ma, Zixuan
    Yin, Riyong
    Li, An
    Yin, Xunzhi
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2023, 298
  • [3] Assessment of construction cost reduction of nearly zero energy dwellings in a life cycle perspective
    Zinzi, Michele
    Mattoni, Benedetta
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 251
  • [4] Optimal dispatch of nearly-zero carbon integrated energy system considering waste incineration plant-carbon capture system and market mechanisms
    Zheng, Wendi
    Xu, Zhihong
    Shao, Zhenguo
    Li, Jihui
    Lei, Kebo
    Li, Jiurong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2023, 48 (69) : 27013 - 27031
  • [5] Whole life carbon assessment of representative building typologies for nearly zero energy building definitions
    Kayacetin, N. Cihan
    Hozatli, Burak
    JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING, 2024, 95
  • [6] Collaborative optimization method and energy-saving, carbon-abatement potential evaluation for nearly-zero energy community supply system with different scenarios
    Wu, Di
    Fan, Guangyao
    Duan, Yuxuan
    Liu, Ao
    Zhang, Peiwen
    Guo, Jiacheng
    Lin, Chengkai
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2023, 91
  • [7] Energy and Material Flows and Carbon Footprint Assessment Concerning the Production of HMF and Furfural from a Cellulosic Biomass
    Schoeppe, Hannes
    Kleine-Moellhoff, Peter
    Epple, Rolf
    PROCESSES, 2020, 8 (01)
  • [8] Carbon footprint assessment of a whole dairy farming system with a biogas plant and the use of solid fraction of digestate as a recycled bedding material
    Setoguchi, Akira
    Oishi, Kazato
    Kimura, Yoshiaki
    Ogino, Akifumi
    Kumagai, Hajime
    Hirooka, Hiroyuki
    Resources, Conservation and Recycling Advances, 2022, 15
  • [9] Carbon footprint assessment of a whole dairy farming system with a biogas plant and the use of solid fraction of digestate as a recycled bedding material
    Setoguchi, Akira
    Oishi, Kazato
    Kimura, Yoshiaki
    Ogino, Akifumi
    Kumagai, Hajime
    Hirooka, Hiroyuki
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION & RECYCLING ADVANCES, 2022, 15
  • [10] Carbon Footprint and Life Cycle Cost Assessment of a Hydrogen-Based Energy Storage System for Ships with a Case Study
    Seddiek, Ibrahim S.
    Ammar, Nader R.
    NAVAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL, 2023, 135 (03) : 107 - 120