Article COVID-19 test-to-stay program for K-12 schools: Opt-in versus opt-out consent model

被引:0
|
作者
Ivanov, Anton [1 ]
Mukherjee, Ujjal Kumar [1 ,6 ]
Bose, Subhonmesh [2 ]
Seshadri, Sridhar [1 ,6 ]
Watkins, Ronald [3 ]
England, Albert Charles [4 ]
Suriano, Jacqueline [3 ]
Ahsen, Mehmet Eren [1 ,6 ]
Souyris, Sebastian [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Business Adm, Champaign, IL 61821 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Elect & Comp Engn, Champaign, IL 61821 USA
[3] Univ Illinois Syst, Shield Illinois, Champaign, IL 61821 USA
[4] OSF HealthCare Heart Mary Med Ctr, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[5] Rensselaer Polytech Inst, Lally Sch Management, Troy, NY 12180 USA
[6] Univ Illinois, Hlth Innovat Prof Carle Illinois Coll Med, Champaign, IL USA
关键词
STATUS-QUO BIAS; DISPARITIES; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.isci.2023.108770
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention promoted the Test -to -Stay (TTS) program to facilitate inperson instruction in K-12 schools during COVID-19. This program delineates guidelines for schools to regularly test students and staff to minimize risks of infection transmission. TTS enrollment can be implemented via two different consent models: opt -in, in which students do not test regularly by default, and the opposite, opt -out model. We study the impacts of the two enrollment approaches on testing and positivity rates with data from 259 schools in Illinois. Our results indicate that after controlling for other covariates, schools following the opt -out model are associated with 84% higher testing rate and 30% lower positivity rate. If all schools adopted the opt -out model, 20% of the total lost school days could have been saved. The lower positivity rate among the opt -out group is largely explained by the higher testing rate in these schools, a manifestation of status quo bias.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Effect of Opt-In vs Opt-Out Framing on Enrollment in a COVID-19 Surveillance Testing Program The COVID SAFE Randomized Clinical Trial
    Oakes, Allison H.
    Epstein, Jonathan A.
    Ganguly, Arupa
    Park, Sae-Hwan
    Evans, Chalanda N.
    Patel, Mitesh S.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (06)
  • [2] Vaccination of pregnant women against COVID-19 in India and Indonesia: Moving beyond the opt-in to the opt-out option
    Sarwal, Yamini
    Sarwal, Tanvi
    Sarwal, Rakesh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2021, 155 (03) : 549 - 550
  • [3] A Test-to-Stay Modified Quarantine Program for COVID-19 in Schools
    Schechter-Perkins, Elissa M.
    Doron, Shira
    Johnston, Russell
    Hay, Jeremiah
    Berlin, David
    Ciaranello, Andrea
    Nelson, Sandra B.
    Gormley, Jenny M.
    Smole, Sandra C.
    Brown, Catherine M.
    Madoff, Lawrence C.
    Branch-Elliman, Westyn
    PEDIATRICS, 2022, 149 (05)
  • [4] Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on an Emergency Department-Based Universal Opt-Out HIV Screening Program in Atlanta, GA, 2020
    Yaffee, A. Q.
    Belay, Z.
    Shah, B.
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 76 (04) : S70 - S70
  • [5] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on an emergency department-based opt-out HIV screening program in a South Florida hospital: An interrupted time series analysis, July 2018-March 2021
    Niu, Jianli
    Sareli, Candice
    Eckardt, Paula A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2022, 50 (09) : 994 - 998