Business and human rights;
due diligence;
ethics;
equality;
harm;
public and private;
responsibility;
UN GUIDING PRINCIPLES;
DILIGENCE;
JUSTICE;
RESPONSIBILITY;
D O I:
10.1017/bhj.2023.10
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 ;
摘要:
The UN Guiding Principles (UNGPs) and their concept of human rights due diligence (HRDD) cannot succeed in their current form, because they reify neoliberalism's public/private divide. This article establishes this argument across historical, theoretical, and normative dimensions, and charts a new way forward. The UNGPs' separation of the 'state duty to protect' from the 'corporate responsibility to respect' reflects a contestable conception of companies as private actors: free to act/transact in any way that is not harmful. This is a problem because harm is often invisible, even when taking an active due-diligence approach. To resolve this, HRDD practices must also be based on the positive value of equality. However, businesses are more than mere agents; they also coordinate production and enable social connections. These structural features reveal a 'missing fourth pillar' of the UNGPs: a collective political responsibility to challenge and change our current world order.