共 50 条
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System is a valid, reliable, and responsive tool to assess symptom burden in decompensated cirrhosis
被引:0
|作者:
Donlan, John
[1
]
Zeng, Chengbo
[2
]
Indriolo, Teresa
[3
]
Li, Lucinda
[3
]
Zhu, Enya
[3
]
Zhou, Joyce
[4
]
Pintro, Kedie
[5
]
Horick, Nora
[5
]
Edelen, Maria
[2
]
Chung, Raymond T.
[3
]
El-Jawahri, Areej
[6
]
Ufere, Nneka N.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Patient Reported Outcomes Value & Experience PROV, Boston, MA USA
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Liver Ctr, Gastrointestinal Div, Boston, MA USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, MGH Biostat, Boston, MA USA
[6] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Med, Div Hematol & Oncol, Boston, MA USA
关键词:
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
LIVER-DISEASE;
CANCER;
OUTCOMES;
D O I:
暂无
中图分类号:
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: While there is a growing need for interventions addressing symptom burden in patients with decompensated cirrhosis (DC), the lack of validated symptom assessment tools is a critical barrier. We investigated the psychometric properties of the revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS-r) in a longitudinal cohort of patients with DC. Methods: Adult outpatients with DC were prospectively recruited from a liver transplant center and completed ESAS-r at baseline and week 12. We examined reliability, floor/ceiling effects, structural validity, and known-groups validity. We examined the convergent and predictive validity of ESAS-r with health-related quality of life using the Short Form Liver Disease Quality of Life (SF-LDQOL) and responsiveness to changes in anxiety and depression using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 from baseline to week 12. Results: From August 2018 to September 2022, 218 patients (9% Child-Pugh A, 59% Child-Pugh B, and 32% Child-Pugh C) were prospectively recruited and completed the ESAS-r, SF-LDQOL, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at baseline and week 12 (n = 135). ESAS-r had strong reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.86), structural validity (comparative fit index 0.95), known-groups validity (Child-Pugh A: 25.1 vs. B: 37.5 vs. C: 41.4, p = 0.006), and convergent validity (r = -0.67 with SF-LDQOL). Floor effects were 9% and ceiling effects were 0.5%. Changes in ESAS-r scores from baseline to week 12 significantly predicted changes in SF-LDQOL (beta = -0.36, p < 0.001), accounting for 30% of the variation. ESAS-r was strongly responsive to clinically meaningful changes in SF-LDQOL, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Conclusions: ESAS-r is a reliable, valid, and responsive tool for assessing symptom burden in patients with DC and can predict changes in health-related quality of life. Future directions include its implementation as a key outcome measure in cirrhosis care and clinical trials.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文