Integrating argumentation in physics inquiry: A design and evaluation study

被引:3
|
作者
Pols, C. F. J. [1 ]
Dekkers, P. J. J. M. [1 ]
de Vries, M. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Sci Educ & Commun, Lorentzweg 1, NL-2628 CJ Delft, Netherlands
来源
关键词
PRACTICAL WORK; SCIENCE-EDUCATION; IDEAS; PERCEPTIONS; TEACHERS; POINT;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020170
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This small-scale, qualitative study uses educational design research to explore how focusing on argumentation may contribute to students' learning to engage in inquiry independently. Understanding inquiry as the construction of a scientifically cogent argument in support of a claim may encourage students to develop personal reasons for adhering to scientific criteria and to use these with understanding rather than by rote. An understanding of the characteristics of scientific evidence may clarify why doing inquiry in specific ways is important, in addition to the how. On the basis of five design principles-derived from literature-that integrate argumentation in inquiry and enhance learning through practical activities, we developed a teaching-learning sequence of five activities aimed at developing inquiry knowledge in lower secondary school students. By means of observations of a grade 9 physics class (N 1/4 23, aged 14-15), students' answers to worksheets, and self-reflection questions, we explored whether the design principles resulted in the intended students' actions and attitudes. We studied whether the activities stimulated students to engage in argumentation and to develop the targeted inquiry knowledge. The focus on argumentation, specifically through critical evaluation of the quality of evidence, persuaded students to evaluate whether what they thought, said, or claimed was "scientifically" justifiable and convincing. They gradually uncovered key characteristics of scientific evidence, understandings of what counts as convincing in science, and why. Rather than adopting and practicing the traditional inquiry skills, students in these activities developed a cognitive need and readiness for learning such skills. Of their own accord, they used their gained insights to make deliberate decisions about collecting reliable and valid data and substantiating the reliability of their claims. This study contributes to our understanding of how to enable students to successfully engage in inquiry by extending the theoretical framework for argumentation toward teaching inquiry and by developing a tested educational approach derived from it.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Defining and assessing understandings of evidence with the assessment rubric for physics inquiry: Towards integration of argumentation and inquiry
    Pols, C. F. J.
    Dekkers, P. J. J. M.
    de Vries, M. J.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2022, 18 (01):
  • [2] Argumentation and knowledge inquiry
    Horng, Ruey-Yun
    Lin, Tzu-Jung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 100 - 100
  • [3] CLINICAL INNOVATION AND EVALUATION - INTEGRATING PRACTICE WITH INQUIRY
    DAVISON, GC
    LAZARUS, AA
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY-SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 1994, 1 (02) : 157 - 168
  • [4] The Effects of Inquiry and Argumentation-Based Training on Argumentation, Inquiry and Science Process Skills
    Higde, Emrah
    Aktamis, Hilal
    PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI EGITIM FAKULTESI DERGISI-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2023, (59):
  • [5] Mechanism Design for Argumentation-Based Information-Seeking and Inquiry
    Fan, Xiuyi
    Toni, Francesca
    PRIMA 2015: PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2015, 9387 : 519 - 527
  • [6] Expertise, Argumentation, and the End of Inquiry
    Axel Gelfert
    Argumentation, 2011, 25 : 297 - 312
  • [7] A rating scale development study for the evaluation of lesson plans and teaching practices on argumentation-based inquiry
    Hasancebi, Funda Yesildag
    Yuksel, Busra Tuncay
    Mesci, Gunkut
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION, 2022, 9 (04): : 964 - 997
  • [8] Expertise, Argumentation, and the End of Inquiry
    Gelfert, Axel
    ARGUMENTATION, 2011, 25 (03) : 297 - 312
  • [9] Empirical Argumentation: Integrating Induction and Argumentation in MAS
    Ontanon, Santiago
    Plaza, Enric
    ARGUMENTATION IN MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS (ARGMAS), 2011, 6614 : 49 - 67
  • [10] Design research on inquiry-based multivariable calculus: focusing on students’ argumentation and instructional design
    Kwon O.N.
    Bae Y.
    Oh K.H.
    ZDM, 2015, 47 (6): : 997 - 1011