Risk Factors and Predictors for Functional Outcome and Complication Rate in Total Hip Arthroplasty through Minimally Invasive and Conventional Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis of 41 Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:6
|
作者
Ramadanov, Nikolai [1 ]
Ostojic, Marko [2 ]
Lazaru, Philip [3 ]
Liu, Kuiliang [4 ]
Hable, Robert [5 ]
Marinova-Kichikova, Polina [6 ]
Dimitrov, Dobromir [7 ]
Becker, Roland [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Brandenburg An Der Havel, Ctr Orthopaed & Traumatol, Brandenburg Med Sch, D-14770 Brandenburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Mostar, Dept Orthoped Surg, Mostar 88000, Bosnia & Herceg
[3] St Marien Hosp, Dept Gen & Visceral Surg, Minimally Invas Surg & Coloproctol, D-12249 Berlin, Germany
[4] Siloah St Trudpert Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, D-75179 Pforzheim, Germany
[5] Deggendorf Inst Technol, Fac Appl Comp Sci, D-94469 Deggendorf, Germany
[6] Med Univ Pleven, Fac Med, Dept Surg Propaedeut, Pleven 5800, Bulgaria
[7] Med Univ Pleven, Fac Med, Dept Surg Dis, Pleven 5800, Bulgaria
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; meta-regression; minimally invasive; conventional approach; DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH; POSTEROLATERAL APPROACH; MUSCLE DAMAGE; FOLLOW-UP; POSTERIOR APPROACH; SURGICAL APPROACH; LATERAL APPROACH; CLINICAL-TRIAL; OSTEOARTHRITIS; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12185895
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate and identify risk factors and predictors for the difference in functional outcome and complications between total hip arthroplasty (THA) through minimally invasive and conventional approaches, using a meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: A systematic review of the literature up to 31 July 2022 was performed. A meta-regression was conducted based on a random effects meta-analysis using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method. Results: A total of 41 RCTs with 3607 patients were found. The following predictors of HHS >= 6 months postoperatively were identified: patient age (predictor estimate = 0.14; p < 0.01), avascular necrosis of the femoral head (predictor estimate = -0.03; p = 0.04); incision length (predictor estimate = -0.82; p < 0.01). The following predictors of complication rate were identified: osteoarthritis (predictor estimate = 0.02; p = 0.02); femoral neck fracture (predictor estimate = -0.02; p = 0.02); SuperPATH (predictor estimate = -1.72; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Patient age, avascular necrosis of the femoral head, and incision length were identified as predictors of the effect size of the HHS >= 6 months postoperatively; and osteoarthritis, femoral neck fracture, and SuperPATH as predictors of the effect size of the complication rate. Based on these findings, we recommend that more frequent use of minimally invasive THA in elderly patients should be considered. Level of evidence I: a systematic review of all relevant randomized controlled trials. Registered in PROSPERO on 10 August 2022 (CRD42022350287).
引用
收藏
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 47 Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ramadanov, Nikolai
    Marinova-Kichikova, Polina
    Hable, Robert
    Dimitrov, Dobromir
    PROSTHESIS, 2023, 5 (03): : 962 - 991
  • [2] Comparison of Postoperative Serum Biomarkers after Total Hip Arthroplasty through Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Approaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ramadanov, Nikolai
    Marinova-Kichikova, Polina
    Hable, Robert
    Dimitrov, Dobromir
    Becker, Roland
    PROSTHESIS, 2023, 5 (03): : 694 - 710
  • [3] Minimally Invasive Intermuscular Approaches Versus Conventional Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Clesham, Kevin
    Sheridan, Gerard A.
    Greidanus, Nelson, V
    Masri, Bassam A.
    Garbuz, Donald S.
    Duncan, Clive P.
    Howard, Lisa C.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (08): : 1658 - 1666
  • [4] Patient-related Predictors for the Functional Outcome of SuperPATH Hemiarthroplasty versus Conventional Approach Hemiarthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Ramadanov, Nikolai
    Voss, Maximilian
    Hable, Robert
    Prill, Robert
    Hakam, Hassan Tarek
    Salzmann, Mikhail
    Dimitrov, Dobromir
    Becker, Roland
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2024, 16 (04) : 791 - 801
  • [5] An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on Total Hip Arthroplasty through SuperPATH versus Conventional Approaches
    Ramadanov, Nikolai
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2022, 14 (05) : 807 - 823
  • [6] Metal-on-Metal vs Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Voleti, P. B.
    Baldwin, K. D.
    Lee, G-C
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (12) : 1050 - 1051
  • [7] Metal-on-Metal vs Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Voleti, Pramod B.
    Baldwin, Keith D.
    Lee, Gwo-Chin
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2012, 27 (10): : 1844 - 1849
  • [8] Clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of robotic assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Ruangsomboon, Pakpoom
    Ruangsomboon, Onlak
    Osman, Khabab
    Pincus, Daniel
    Mundi, Raman
    Tomescu, Sebastian
    Ravi, Bheeshma
    Chaudhry, Harman
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 18 (01)
  • [9] Comparison of minimally invasive approaches and standard median parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Li
    Li, Xian
    Ruewald, Julian M.
    Welle, Kristian
    Schildberg, Frank A.
    Kabir, Koroush
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2021, 29 (03) : 557 - 574
  • [10] Minimally invasive versus conventional exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes
    Toby O. Smith
    Vicky Blake
    Caroline B. Hing
    International Orthopaedics, 2011, 35 : 173 - 184