Improved predictive diagnosis of diabetic macular edema based on hybrid models: An observational study

被引:1
|
作者
Hughes-Cano, J. A. [1 ]
Quiroz-Mercado, H. [2 ]
Hernandez-Zimbron, L. F. [2 ]
Garcia-Franco, R. [3 ]
Mijangos, J. F. Rubio [3 ]
Lopez-Star, E. [3 ]
Garcia-Roa, M. [3 ]
Lansingh, V. C. [3 ,4 ]
Olivares-Pinto, U. [5 ]
Thebault, S. C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Lab Invest Traslac Salud Visual, Inst Neurobiol, Campus Juriquilla, Queretaro, Mexico
[2] Asociac Evitar Ceguera, Res Dept, Mexico City, Mexico
[3] Inst Mexicano Oftalmol IMO IAP, Circuito Exterior Estadio Corregidora S-N, Santiago De Queretaro 76090, Queretaro, Mexico
[4] HelpMeSee Inc, 20 West 36th St,Floor 4, New York, NY 10018 USA
[5] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Escuela Nacl Estudios Super Unidad Juriquilla, Campus Juriquilla, Queretaro, Mexico
关键词
Machine learning; Classifier; Hybrid model;
D O I
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.107979
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) is the most common sight-threatening complication of type 2 diabetes. Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is the most useful imaging technique to diagnose, follow up, and evaluate treatments for DME. However, OCT exam and devices are expensive and unavailable in all clinics in low- and middle-income countries. Our primary goal was therefore to develop an alternative method to OCT for DME diagnosis by introducing spectral information derived from spontaneous electroretinogram (ERG) signals as a single input or combined with fundus that is much more widespread. Baseline ERGs were recorded in 233 patients and transformed into scalograms and spectrograms via Wavelet and Fourier transforms, respectively. Using transfer learning, distinct Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) were trained as classifiers for DME using OCT, scalogram, spectrogram, and eye fundus images. Input data were randomly split into training and test sets with a proportion of 80 %-20 %, respectively. The top performers for each input type were selected, OpticNet-71 for OCT, DenseNet-201 for eye fundus, and non-evoked ERG-derived scalograms, to generate a combined model by assigning different weights for each of the selected models. Model validation was performed using a dataset alien to the training phase of the models. None of the models powered by mock ERG-derived input performed well. In contrast, hybrid models showed better results, in particular, the model powered by eye fundus combined with mock ERG-derived information with a 91 % AUC and 86 % F1-score, and the model powered by OCT and mock ERG-derived scalogram images with a 93 % AUC and 89 % F1-score. These data show that the spontaneous ERGderived input adds predictive value to the fundus- and OCT-based models to diagnose DME, except for the sensitivity of the OCT model which remains the same. The inclusion of mock ERG signals, which have recently been shown to take only 5 min to record in daylight conditions, therefore represents a potential improvement over existing OCT-based models, as well as a reliable and cost-effective alternative when combined with the fundus, especially in underserved areas, to predict DME.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Observational study of subclinical diabetic macular edema
    Bressler, N. M.
    Miller, K. M.
    Beck, R. W.
    Bressler, S. B.
    Glassman, A. R.
    Kitchens, J. W.
    Melia, M.
    Schlossman, D. K.
    EYE, 2012, 26 (06) : 833 - 840
  • [2] Observational study of subclinical diabetic macular edema
    N M Bressler
    K M Miller
    R W Beck
    S B Bressler
    A R Glassman
    J W Kitchens
    M Melia
    D K Schlossman
    Eye, 2012, 26 : 833 - 840
  • [3] Observational Study of Subclinical Diabetic Macular Edema
    Kitchens, J. W.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [4] Erratum: Observational study of subclinical diabetic macular edema
    N M Bressler
    K M Miller
    R W Beck
    S B Bressler
    A R Glassman
    J W Kitchens
    M Melia
    D K Schlossman
    Eye, 2012, 26 (6) : 900 - 901
  • [5] Costs and Quality of Life in Diabetic Macular Edema: Canadian Burden of Diabetic Macular Edema Observational Study (C-REALITY)
    Gonder, John R.
    Walker, Valery M.
    Barbeau, Martin
    Zaour, Nancy
    Zachau, Bryan H.
    Hartje, James R.
    Li, Ruihong
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 2014
  • [6] Recent aspects on diagnosis of diabetic macular edema
    dos Santos Motta, Mario Martins
    Coblentz, Jacqueline
    Nunes de Melo, Laura Gomes
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE OFTALMOLOGIA, 2009, 68 (01) : 59 - 63
  • [7] Severity distribution of diabetic macular edema at diagnosis
    Lima-Gomez, Virgilio
    Razo Blanco-Hernandez, Dulce Milagros
    Munoz-Ibarra, Patricia
    Lucia Hernandez-Rojas, Myriam
    CIRUGIA Y CIRUJANOS, 2011, 79 (06): : 453 - 458
  • [8] Predictive factors of selective retina therapy for diabetic macular edema
    Hirayama, Kumiko
    Yamamoto, Manabu
    Kohno, Takeya
    Theissen-Kunde, Dirk
    Miura, Yoko
    Brinkmann, Ralf
    Shiraki, Kunihiko
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [9] Hybrid deep learning models for the screening of Diabetic Macular Edema in optical coherence tomography volumes
    Rodriguez-Miguel, Antonio
    Arruabarrena, Carolina
    Allendes, German
    Olivera, Maximiliano
    Zarranz-Ventura, Javier
    Teus, Miguel A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [10] A controlled study of vitrectomy for diabetic macular edema
    Otani, T
    Kishi, S
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2002, 134 (02) : 214 - 219