Integration of golf practise and strength and conditioning in golf: Insights from professional golf coaches

被引:0
|
作者
Bliss, Alex [1 ,3 ]
Langdown, Ben [2 ]
机构
[1] St Marys Univ, Ctr Appl Performance Sci, London, England
[2] Open Univ, Sch Educ Childhood Youth & Sport, Milton Keynes, England
[3] St Marys Univ, Sch Allied Hlth & Performance Sci, Waldegrave Rd, London TW1 4SX, England
关键词
Coach-athlete relationship; multi-disciplinary team; periodisation; INJURY PREVENTION STRATEGIES; PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE; TRAINING LOAD; PERCEPTIONS; ATHLETE; TECHNOLOGY; RECOVERY; SCIENCE; DEVICES; SPORTS;
D O I
10.1177/17479541231199657
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Strength and conditioning (S&C) interventions for golfers consistently demonstrate improvements in performance metrics such as clubhead speed. Golfers typically employ Professional Golfers' Association (PGA) coaches to support technical and tactical development. These coaches need to ensure golfers balance S&C training alongside competitions and technical golf practise, although no empirical data exist that demonstrates how this integration occurs practically. This study aimed to investigate the perceptions and practises of PGA Professional golf coaches and how S&C is integrated into the golf year. Forty-three (male = 35; female = 8) PGA coaches completed a mixed-methods survey with questions on themes such as coaching approach, perceptions of S&C, annual planning and goal setting. Results show that formal planning processes are highly variable or absent. The majority (n = 29; 70.7%) of PGA coaches stated they worked with an S&C coach and see the role of the S&C coach to support golfers with their input. However, when planning the season, 63.4% (n = 26) of coaches do so without input from the S&C coach. These and other related disconnects between desire for S&C intervention and inclusion of the S&C coach in planning processes were evident throughout survey responses. There may be subsequent risks of conflict or misunderstanding between PGA coach, S&C coach and golfer. It is recommended golf coaches, golfers and S&C coaches work collaboratively as a multidisciplinary support team to ensure coordinated golfer support is obtained.
引用
收藏
页码:1469 / 1478
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Professional golf coaches' perceptions of the key technical parameters in the golf swing
    Smith, Aimee
    Roberts, Jonathan
    Wallace, Eric
    Forrester, Stephanie
    ENGINEERING OF SPORT CONFERENCE 2012, 2012, 34 : 224 - 229
  • [2] Strength and Conditioning Considerations for Golf
    Read, Paul J.
    Lloyd, Rhodri S.
    STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING JOURNAL, 2014, 36 (05) : 24 - 33
  • [3] Perceptions and approaches of golf coaches towards strength and conditioning activities for youth golfers
    Shaw, James
    Gould, Zachariah, I
    Oliver, Jon L.
    Lloyd, Rhodri S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE & COACHING, 2023, 18 (05) : 1629 - 1638
  • [5] Legitimising and Delegitimising Women Coaches in the Golf Industry: Women Golf Professionals' Experiences of Advocacy
    Mollin, Alex
    Allen, Justine
    Henning, April
    SOCIAL SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 12 (11):
  • [6] Coaches' perceptions of golf swing kinematics
    Sherman, CA
    Sparrow, WA
    Jolley, D
    Eldering, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 32 (03) : 257 - 270
  • [7] Integrating strength and conditioning training and golf practice during the golf season: Approaches and perceptions of highly skilled golfers
    Bliss, Alex
    Langdown, Ben
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE & COACHING, 2023, 18 (05) : 1605 - 1614
  • [8] Loss Aversion in Professional Golf
    Elmore, Ryan
    Urbaczewski, Andrew
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS ECONOMICS, 2021, 22 (02) : 202 - 217
  • [9] Golf Coaches' Mindsets About Recreational Golfers: Gendered Golf Experiences Start on the Practice Tee
    Shapcott, Susan
    Carr, Sam
    MOTIVATION SCIENCE, 2020, 6 (03) : 275 - 284
  • [10] Professional golf-an occupational health review Part 2: Golf caddie
    Wanke, E. M.
    Melander, A. C.
    Groneberg, D. A.
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR ARBEITSMEDIZIN ARBEITSSCHUTZ UND ERGONOMIE, 2020, 70 (03): : 130 - 135