Validation of Hindi version of the obstetric quality of recovery score-11 (ObsQoR-11 H) following elective caesarean section

被引:2
|
作者
Gupta, Sunanda [1 ]
Choudhary, Savita [1 ,5 ]
Choudhary, Vidhu [2 ]
Jain, Kajal [3 ]
Bhatia, Nidhi [3 ]
Gupta, Apoorva [4 ]
机构
[1] Geetanjali Med Coll & Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
[2] Rajiv Gandhi Canc Inst & Res Ctr, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, New Delhi, India
[3] PGIMER, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Chandigarh, India
[4] Oxford Med Coll Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Anaesthesia & Crit Care, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
[5] Geetanjali Med Coll, Dept Anaesthesiol & Crit Care, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
关键词
Caesarean section; Global Health Numeric Rating Scale; obstetric quality of recovery score; patient-reported outcome measures; psychometrics; recovery;
D O I
10.4103/ija.ija_69_23
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Obstetric quality of recovery score-11 (ObsQoR-11) was developed in English to evaluate the quality of recovery in the caesarean section. We aimed to validate the Hindi version of ObsQoR-11 (ObsQoR-11H) for Hindi-speaking patients to evaluate the quality of recovery following the elective caesarean section.Methods: The ObsQoR-11 was translated into Hindi and assessed for validity, acceptability and feasibility. The questionnaire was administered postoperatively at 24 and 48 hours, and the Global Health Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) was used to evaluate recovery.Results: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) (95% confidence interval [CI]) ObsQoR-11 H was 75.94 (4.09)(95% CI 75.1, 76.7) and 80.25 (4.08)(95% CI 79.5, 81) at 24 and 48 hours, respectively. The mean (SD) (95%CI) Global Health NRS scores were 71.22 (5.97)(95% CI 70, 72.4) and 77.37 (5.79)(95% CI 76.2, 78.5) at 24 and 48 hours, respectively. Convergent validity showed a strong correlation between ObsQoR-11H and Global Health NRS (Spearman's correlation coefficient [rs] >0.8 and 0.78) scores at 24 and 48 hours, respectively. Discriminant validity was significant in appreciating the difference between good and poor recovery (P < 0.001). Split-half coefficient of 0.69 and 0.65 and Cronbach's alpha (alpha) of 0.91 and 0.82 at 24 and 48 hours suggested good score reliability. The acceptability and feasibility of the score were also good.Conclusion: The ObsQoR-11H discriminated well between 'good' and 'poor' recovery and correlated strongly with Global Health NRS scores. It was found to be a valid, reliable, acceptable and feasible tool for psychometric recovery evaluation after elective caesarean section in Hindi-speaking women.
引用
收藏
页码:S251 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-11) following non-elective caesarean delivery
    Ciechanowicz, S.
    Howie, R.
    Heppolette, C.
    Nakhjavani, B.
    Carvalho, B.
    Sultan, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2019, 39 : 51 - 59
  • [2] Use of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-11) to measure the impact of an enhanced recovery programme for elective caesarean section
    Kielty, J.
    Borkowska, A.
    Lawlor, E.
    EL-Khuffash, A. F.
    Doherty, A.
    O'Flaherty, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2024, 57
  • [3] Development and evaluation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery score (ObsQoR-11) after elective Caesarean delivery
    Ciechanowicz, S.
    Setty, T.
    Robson, E.
    Sathasivam, C.
    Chazapis, M.
    Dick, J.
    Carvalho, B.
    Sultan, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2019, 122 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [4] Validation and Clinical Utility of the Korean Version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery Score (ObsQoR-11) Following Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study
    Kang, Ryung A.
    Lee, Seungwon
    Lee, Eunkyung
    Cho, Yoon Jee
    Jeong, Ji Seon
    Choi, Soo Joo
    Gwak, Mi Sook
    Sim, Woo Seog
    Kim, Duk Kyung
    Ko, Justin Sangwook
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (02)
  • [5] Validation of an obstetric quality-of-recovery scoring tool (ObsQoR-11) after emergency Caesarean delivery
    Howle, R.
    Ciechanowicz, S.
    Heppolette, C.
    Nakhjavani, B.
    Sultan, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 121 (02) : E19 - E20
  • [6] Validation of an obstetric quality of recovery scoring tool (ObsQoR-11) after elective caesarean delivery in a developing country: a prospective observational study
    Kumar, S.
    Ashok, V
    Jain, D.
    Arora, A.
    Singh, A.
    Sikka, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2022, 49
  • [7] Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean delivery
    Gökhan Ozkan
    Umut Kara
    Mehmet Emin Ince
    Ozhan Ozdemir
    Mustafa Ulubay
    Serkan Senkal
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20
  • [8] Validation of the Turkish version of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score 11 (ObsQoR-11T) after cesarean delivery
    Ozkan, Gokhan
    Kara, Umut
    Ince, Mehmet Emin
    Ozdemir, Ozhan
    Ulubay, Mustafa
    Senkal, Serkan
    HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [9] Validation of the Chinese Version of Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery ObsQoR-10 After Elective Caesarean Delivery
    Yang, Lu
    Tan, Chin Wen
    Sultana, Rehena
    Sen Tan, Hon
    Sng, Ban Leong
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2024, 139 (06): : 1265 - 1266
  • [10] Validation of Chinese version of a global anesthetic recovery questionnaire: A multicenter observational trial on ObsQoR-11
    Chou, Wei -Han
    Lee, Sing-Ong
    Sun, Min-Hsuan
    Tseng, Ying-Chih
    Chan, Kuang-Cheng
    Chen, Ying-Hsi
    Wu, Chun-Yu
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 122 (06) : 479 - 485