Analysis of machine learning approaches to packing detection

被引:2
|
作者
Van Ouytsel, Charles-Henry Bertrand [1 ]
Dam, Khanh Huu The [1 ]
Legay, Axel [1 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, INGI, ICTEAM, Pl Sainte Barbe 2,LG05 02,01, B-1348 Louvain La Neuve, Belgium
关键词
Malware; Machine learning; Packing; Features analysis; SHAP values; Experimental comparison; Adversarial attack; ANOMALY DETECTION; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cose.2023.103536
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Packing is a widely used obfuscation technique by which malware hides content and behavior. Much research explores how to detect a packed program via such varied approaches as entropy analysis, syntactic signatures, and, more recently, machine learning classifiers using various features. Yet no robust results indicate which algorithms perform best or which features are most significant. Reviews of these results highlight how accuracy, cost, generalization of capabilities, and other measures complicate evaluations. Our work addresses deficiencies by assessing nine different machine-learning approaches using 119 features to identify which features are most significant for packing detection, which algorithms offer the best performance, and which algorithms are most economical.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of Human Activity Detection Using Machine Learning Approaches
    Gowda S.G.
    Shetty S.M.
    Darshini M.S.
    Rajani D.
    [J]. SN Computer Science, 4 (2)
  • [2] Machine learning approaches for the optimization of packing densities in granular matter
    Baule, Adrian
    Kurban, Esma
    Liu, Kuang
    Makse, Hernan A.
    [J]. SOFT MATTER, 2023, 19 (36) : 6875 - 6884
  • [3] Machine learning approaches in medical image analysis: From detection to diagnosis
    de Bruijne, Marleen
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2016, 33 : 94 - 97
  • [4] Comparison of Multiple Machine Learning Approaches and Sentiment Analysis in Detection of Spam
    Alam, A. N. M. Sajedul
    Zaman, Shifat
    Dey, Arnob Kumar
    Bin Kibria, Junaid
    Alam, Zawad
    Mahbub, Mohammed Julfikar Ali
    Mahtab, Md. Motahar
    Rasel, Annajiat Alim
    [J]. ADVANCES IN COMPUTING AND DATA SCIENCES (ICACDS 2022), PT I, 2022, 1613 : 37 - 50
  • [5] Comparative Analysis of Features Based Machine Learning Approaches for Phishing Detection
    Jain, Ankit Kumar
    Gupta, B. B.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INDIACOM - 2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING FOR SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, : 2125 - 2130
  • [6] Experimental Comparison of Machine Learning Models in Malware Packing Detection
    Kim, Jong-Wouk
    Namgung, Juhong
    Moon, Yang-Sae
    Choi, Mi-Jung
    [J]. APNOMS 2020: 2020 21ST ASIA-PACIFIC NETWORK OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM (APNOMS), 2020, : 377 - 380
  • [7] Detection of trachoma using machine learning approaches
    Socia, Damien
    Brady, Christopher J.
    West, Sheila K.
    Cockrell, R. Chase
    [J]. PLOS NEGLECTED TROPICAL DISEASES, 2022, 16 (12):
  • [8] Covert Channel Detection: Machine Learning Approaches
    Elsadig, Muawia A.
    Gafar, Ahmed
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 38391 - 38405
  • [9] Machine Learning Approaches to Maritime Anomaly Detection
    Obradovic, Ines
    Milicevic, Mario
    Zubrinic, Krunoslav
    [J]. NASE MORE, 2014, 61 (5-6): : 96 - 101
  • [10] An Analysis on Machine Learning Approaches for Sentiment Analysis
    Shrivash, Brajesh Kumar
    Verma, Dinesh Kumar
    Pandey, Prateek
    [J]. SMART SYSTEMS: INNOVATIONS IN COMPUTING (SSIC 2021), 2022, 235 : 499 - 513