Attention allocation in OCD: A systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking-based research

被引:7
|
作者
Basel, Dana [1 ]
Hallel, Hadar [1 ]
Dar, Reuven [1 ]
Lazarov, Amit [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Psychol Sci, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
Attention allocation; Eye-tracking; Free-viewing; Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Systematic review; meta-analysis; OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER; SOCIAL ANXIETY DISORDER; TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY; EMOTIONAL STROOP TASK; PANIC DISORDER; BIAS; THREAT; SYMPTOMS; RESPONSIBILITY; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.141
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Cognitive models of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) implicate heightened attention allocation to stimuli related to one's obsessions in the disorder. Recently, to overcome several limitations of reaction time -based measures, eye-tracking methodology has been increasingly used in attentional research. Methods: A meta-analysis of studies examining attention allocation towards OCD-related vs. neutral stimuli, using eye-tracking methodology and a group-comparison design, was conducted conforming to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Separate meta-analyses were performed for attentional vigilance (both latency and location of first fixations) and maintenance (total dwell time and total fixation count, conjointly). Each meta-analysis was conducted twice - once including all studies (main analysis) and once only including studies using the free-viewing paradigm (secondary analysis).Results: The systematic search yielded a total of nine studies. Of those, eight provided the needed data to be included in the meta-analysis. No evidence emerged for vigilance via latency to first fixation. Vigilance reflected via first fixation location emerged in the main analysis, but not in the secondary one. Evidence for attentional maintenance was found only when analyzing free-viewing studies exclusively (the secondary analysis). Limitations: To increase the accuracy of the research question, correlational studies were excluded, resulting in a small number of available studies. Conclusions: OCD may be characterized by vigilance, but mainly in tasks entailing specific demands and/or goals. Conversely, attentional maintenance may be evident only when using tasks that pose no requirements or de-mands for participants.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 550
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A systematic review of eye-tracking-based research on animated multimedia learning
    Coskun, Atakan
    Cagiltay, Kursat
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2022, 38 (02) : 581 - 598
  • [2] Attention Allocation in ASD: a Review and Meta-analysis of Eye-Tracking Studies
    Meia Chita-Tegmark
    [J]. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2016, 3 : 209 - 223
  • [3] Attention Allocation in ASD: a Review and Meta-analysis of Eye-Tracking Studies
    Chita-Tegmark, Meia
    [J]. REVIEW JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2016, 3 (03) : 209 - 223
  • [4] Erratum to: Attention Allocation in ASD: a Review and Meta-analysis of Eye-Tracking Studies
    Meia Chita-Tegmark
    [J]. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2016, 3 : 400 - 400
  • [5] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Eye-Tracking of Attention to Threat in Child and Adolescent Anxiety
    Lisk, Stephen
    Vaswani, Ayesha
    Linetzky, Marian
    Bar-Haim, Yair
    Lau, Jennifer Y. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 59 (01): : 88 - +
  • [6] A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Eye-Tracking Studies for Consumers' Visual Attention in Online Shopping
    Li, Xin
    Luh, Ding-Bang
    Chen, Zihao
    [J]. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND CONTROL, 2024, 53 (01): : 187 - 205
  • [7] Social attention in ASD: A review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies
    Chita-Tegmark, Meia
    [J]. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2016, 48 : 79 - 93
  • [8] Attention Allocation in ASD: a Review and Meta-analysis of Eye-Tracking Studies (vol 3, pg 209, 2016)
    Chita-Tegmark, Meia
    [J]. REVIEW JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2016, 3 (04) : 400 - 400
  • [9] Eye-tracking in adult depression: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Noyes, Blake
    Biorac, Aleks
    Vazquez, Gustavo
    Khalid-Khan, Sarosh
    Munoz, Douglas
    Booij, Linda
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [10] The effectiveness of eye tracking in the diagnosis of cognitive disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Zicai
    Yang, Zhen
    Gu, Yueming
    Liu, Huiyu
    Wang, Pu
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07):