Advancing toward Personalized and Precise Phosphorus Prescription Models for Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) through Machine Learning

被引:0
|
作者
Chipatela, Floyd Muyembe [1 ]
Khiari, Lotfi [1 ,2 ]
Jouichat, Hamza [2 ]
Kouera, Ismail [1 ]
Ismail, Mahmoud [3 ]
机构
[1] Mohammed VI Polytech Univ, Coll Agr & Environm Sci, Ctr Excellence Soil & Fertilizer Res Afr, Benguerir 43150, Morocco
[2] Laval Univ, Dept Soil Sci & Agrifood Engn, Quebec City, PQ G1V 0A6, Canada
[3] Mohammed VI Polytech Univ, EMINES Sch Ind Management, Benguerir 43150, Morocco
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 03期
关键词
optimal field-specific rate; predicting response curves; prescription of P; unified phosphorus fertility classification system; JAMMU-AND-KASHMIR; BRADYRHIZOBIUM-JAPONICUM; SATURATION INDEX; FARMERS FIELDS; GUINEA SAVANNA; HILLY REGION; GRAIN-YIELD; SEED YIELD; NO-TILL; FERTILIZER;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy14030477
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The traditional approach of prescribing phosphate fertilizer solely based on soil test P (STP) has faced criticism from scientists and agriculturists pushing farmers to seek phosphate fertilization models that incorporate additional factors. By embracing integrated approaches, farmers can receive more precise recommendations that align with their specific conditions and fertilization techniques. This study aimed to utilize artificial intelligence prediction to replicate soybean response curves to fertilizer by integrating edaphic and climatic factors. Literature data on soybean response to P fertilization were collected, and the Random Forest (RF) algorithm was applied to predict response curves. The predictions utilized seven predictors: P dose, STP, soil pH, texture, % OM, precipitation, and P application methods. These predictions were compared to the traditional STP-based approach. The STP-based P prescription models exhibited extremely low robustness values (R-2) of 1.53% and 0.88% for the PBray-1 and P-Olsen diagnostic systems, respectively. In contrast, implementing the RF algorithm allowed for more accurate prediction of yield gains at various P doses, achieving robustness values of 87.4% for the training set and 60.9% for the testing set. The prediction errors remained below 10% throughout the analysis. Implementing artificial intelligence modeling enabled the study to achieve precise predictions of the optimal P dose and customized fertilization recommendations tailored to farmers' specific soil conditions, climate, and individual fertilization practices.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] QTL mapping of phosphorus deficiency tolerance in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)
    Li, YD
    Wang, YJ
    Tong, YP
    Gao, JG
    Zhang, JS
    Chen, SY
    EUPHYTICA, 2005, 142 (1-2) : 137 - 142
  • [2] QTL mapping of phosphorus deficiency tolerance in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.)
    Yi-Dan Li
    Yong-Jun Wang
    Yi-Ping Tong
    Ji-Guo Gao
    Jin-Song Zhang
    Shou-Yi Chen
    Euphytica, 2005, 142 : 137 - 142
  • [3] Recombination hotspots in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]
    McConaughy, Samantha
    Amundsen, Keenan
    Song, Qijian
    Pantalone, Vince
    Hyten, David
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [4] Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.):: utilization, genetics, biotechnology
    Zeller, FJ
    BODENKULTUR, 1999, 50 (03): : 191 - 202
  • [5] Androgenesis in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.): a critical revisit
    Ramlal, Ayyagari
    Mehta, Sahil
    Nautiyal, Aparna
    Baweja, Pooja
    Shivam
    Sharma, Deepshikha
    Lal, S. K.
    Vijayan, Roshni
    Raju, Dhandapani
    Subramaniam, Sreeramanan
    Rajendran, Ambika
    IN VITRO CELLULAR & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY-PLANT, 2024, 60 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [6] SSR diversity of vegetable soybean [Glycine max (L.) merr.]
    Mimura, Makiko
    Coyne, Clarice J.
    Bambuck, Marie W.
    Lumpkin, Thomas A.
    GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 2007, 54 (03) : 497 - 508
  • [7] Black soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.): paving the way toward new nutraceutical
    Kumar, Manoj
    Suhag, Rajat
    Hasan, Muzaffar
    Dhumal, Sangram
    Radha
    Pandiselvam, R.
    Senapathy, Marisennayya
    Sampathrajan, Vellaikumar
    Punia, Sneh
    Sayed, Ali A. S.
    Singh, Surinder
    Kennedy, John F.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2023, 63 (23) : 6208 - 6234
  • [8] SSR Diversity of Vegetable Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]
    Makiko Mimura
    Clarice J. Coyne
    Marie W. Bambuck
    Thomas A. Lumpkin
    Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2007, 54 : 497 - 508
  • [9] Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) cultivar tolerance to sulfentrazone
    Hulting, AG
    Wax, LM
    Nelson, RL
    Simmons, FW
    CROP PROTECTION, 2001, 20 (08) : 679 - 683
  • [10] Androgenesis in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.): a critical revisit
    Ayyagari Ramlal
    Sahil Mehta
    Aparna Nautiyal
    Pooja Baweja
    Deepshikha Shivam
    S. K. Sharma
    Roshni Lal
    Dhandapani Vijayan
    Sreeramanan Raju
    Ambika Subramaniam
    In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, 2024, 60 : 1 - 15