Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules That Are Not Classifiable by the American Thyroid Association Ultrasound Risk Stratification System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Kwon, Daniel [1 ]
Kulich, Marta [1 ]
Mack, Wendy J. [2 ]
Monedero, Rodrigo Martinez [1 ]
Joyo, Eri [3 ]
Angell, Trevor E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Keck Med, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Populat & Publ Hlth Sci, Keck Med, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Div Endocrinol & Diabet, Keck Med, 2020 Zonal Ave,IRD620, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
thyroid neoplasms; papillary thyroid cancer; ultrasound; thyroid nodule; risk stratification; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; TI-RADS; GUIDELINES; TIRADS;
D O I
10.1089/thy.2022.0672
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Sonographic evaluation is fundamental to thyroid nodule assessment. The American Thyroid Association (ATA) ultrasound risk stratification system (USRSS) is widely used, but the appearance of some nodules has been considered nonclassifiable (NC-ATA). The risk of malignancy (RoM) of NC-ATA nodules varies widely between studies, leading to uncertainty in clinical management. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the prevalence and malignancy risk of NC-ATA nodules.Methods: A systematic review was performed searching PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify original studies of thyroid nodules classified using the ATA USRSS from 2016 to 2022 and reporting the outcome of NC-ATA nodules. Meta-analysis was conducted to obtain pooled RoM estimates and meta-regression sensitivity analyses were used to explore sources of between-study heterogeneity.Results: Of 6377 screened studies, 135 underwent full-text review, and 16 studies reporting 21,271 nodules were included. Within these, the pooled prevalence of NC-ATA nodules was 7.8% (1872 nodules; [confidence interval; CI 5.1-11.1]). The pooled RoM estimate for NC-ATA nodules was 20.3% [CI 13.0-28.7] and there was significant heterogeneity between studies (I-2 = 92.8%, p < 0.001). NC-ATA nodule RoM estimates were significantly different by study type: single-center versus multicenter studies (24.8% vs. 12.3%, respectively, p = 0.031) and study design: retrospective versus prospective studies (25.1% vs. 8.5%, respectively, p = 0.003). No significant difference was observed in RoM based on inclusion of Conclusion: In this first meta-analysis comprehensively assessing the RoM of NC-ATA nodules, the malignancy risk was found to be comparable with the current ATA USRSS intermediate suspicion category. Significant heterogeneity was observed between studies and limits the interpretation of these results. In future iterations of the ATA USRSS that seek into incorporate categorization of NC-ATA nodules, these meta-analysis data may help to inform proper malignancy risk stratification. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42020182498), on July 14, 2020.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 602
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic performance of C-TIRADS in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hu, Yan
    Xu, Shangyan
    Zhan, Weiwei
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [2] Systems of RISK Stratification of Malignancy by Ultrasound of Thyroid Nodules
    Rodriguez Arrieta, Luis Antonio
    Roman-Gonzalez, Alejandro
    Builes Barrera, Carlos A.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (11)
  • [3] Diagnostic Performance of Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Joo, Leehi
    Lee, Min Kyoung
    Lee, Ji Ye
    Ha, Eun Ju
    Na, Dong Gyu
    ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2023, 38 (01) : 117 - 128
  • [4] Diagnostic Performance of Six Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Do Hyun
    Kim, Sung Won
    Basurrah, Mohammed Abdullah
    Lee, Jueun
    Hwang, Se Hwan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2023, 220 (06) : 791 - 803
  • [5] Comparison of diagnostic performance of two ultrasound risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kang, Yun Jin
    Ahn, Hee Sun
    Stybayeva, Gulnaz
    Lee, Ju Eun
    Hwang, Se Hwan
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2023, 128 (11): : 1407 - 1414
  • [6] Comparison of diagnostic performance of two ultrasound risk stratification systems for thyroid nodules: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yun Jin Kang
    Hee Sun Ahn
    Gulnaz Stybayeva
    Ju Eun Lee
    Se Hwan Hwang
    La radiologia medica, 2023, 128 : 1407 - 1414
  • [7] Ultrasound risk stratification for malignancy using the 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Children with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
    Jennifer E. Lim-Dunham
    Iclal Erdem Toslak
    Khalid Alsabban
    Amany Aziz
    Brendan Martin
    Gokcan Okur
    Katherine C. Longo
    Pediatric Radiology, 2017, 47 : 429 - 436
  • [8] Ultrasound risk stratification for malignancy using the 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Children with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
    Lim-Dunham, Jennifer E.
    Toslak, Iclal Erdem
    Alsabban, Khalid
    Aziz, Amany
    Martin, Brendan
    Okur, Gokcan
    Longo, Katherine C.
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2017, 47 (04) : 429 - 436
  • [9] Performance of EU-TIRADS in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis
    Castellana, Marco
    Grani, Giorgio
    Radzina, Maija
    Guerra, Vito
    Giovanella, Luca
    Deandrea, Maurilio
    Ngu, Rose
    Durante, Cosimo
    Trimboli, Pierpaolo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2020, 183 (03) : 255 - 264
  • [10] Thyroid nodules: risk stratification for malignancy with ultrasound and guided biopsy
    Anil, Gopinathan
    Hegde, Amogh
    Chong, F. H. Vincent
    CANCER IMAGING, 2011, 11 (01): : 209 - 223