ANGELIC II: An Improved Methodology for Representing Legal Domain Knowledge

被引:5
|
作者
Atkinson, Katie [1 ]
Bench-Capon, Trevor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Comp Sci, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
Legal Knowledge Representation; Methodology; Design;
D O I
10.1145/3594536.3595137
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to provide a definitive, up-to-date account of a methodology has that been proven successful for representing and reasoning about legal domains. The ANGELIC (ADF for kNowledGe Encapsulation of Legal Information for Cases) methodology was originally developed to exploit then recent developments in knowledge representation techniques that lend themselves well to capturing factor-based reasoning about legal cases. The methodology is situated firmly within the tradition of research in AI and Law that aims to build systems that are knowledge rich in terms of the domain expertise that is emulated within the systems. When the methodology was first introduced, it was demonstrated on academic examples, but it was subsequently used in and evaluated on a variety of real world domains for external clients. This set of evaluation exercises yielded a variety of learning points as the methodology was applied to different legal domains with their own particular features. These learning points, and the extensions to the methodology that follow from them, urge a consolidation exercise to provide an updated version of the methodology that reflects how it has matured over time. This paper represents a milestone in the development of the methodology in that it presents the ANGELIC II Domain Model, along with a description of its constituent parts, and demonstrates its application through a case study in a key evaluation domain.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 21
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On methodology of representing knowledge in dynamic domains
    Gelfond, M
    Watson, R
    SCIENCE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, 2002, 42 (01) : 87 - 99
  • [2] A FORMAL METHODOLOGY FOR ACQUIRING AND REPRESENTING EXPERT KNOWLEDGE
    COOKE, NM
    MCDONALD, JE
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 1986, 74 (10) : 1422 - 1430
  • [3] Knowledge discovery in the legal domain
    Zeleznikow, J
    Stranieri, A
    NINTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TOOLS WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, : 574 - 577
  • [4] On Representing Knowledge in the Dependability Domain: a Panel Discussion
    Avizienis, Algirdas
    2008 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DEPENDABLE SYSTEMS & NETWORKS WITH FTCS & DCC, 2008, : 440 - 441
  • [5] THE CUMULATIVENESS OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE LEGAL SCIENCE DOMAIN
    Timsit, Gerard
    REVUE EUROPEENNE DES SCIENCES SOCIALES, 2005, 43 (131): : 81 - 86
  • [6] Practical knowledge management in the legal domain
    Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal
    International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Electronic Systems, Proceedings, KES, 2000, 1 : 133 - 136
  • [7] Practical knowledge management in the legal domain
    Costa, M
    Neves, J
    KES'2000: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE-BASED INTELLIGENT ENGINEERING SYSTEMS & ALLIED TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 133 - 136
  • [8] Legal-Onto: An Ontology-based Model for Representing the Knowledge of a Legal Document
    Nguyen, Thinh H.
    Nguyen, Hien D.
    Pham, Vuong T.
    Tran, Dung A.
    Selamat, Ali
    ENASE: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION OF NOVEL APPROACHES TO SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2022, : 426 - 434
  • [9] DEVELOPMENT OF SYSTEMIC LEGAL KNOWLEDGE IN CONTEMPORARY METHODOLOGY
    Voronin, M. V.
    VESTNIK PERMSKOGO UNIVERSITETA-JURIDICHESKIE NAUKI, 2015, (03): : 89 - 99
  • [10] Representing guidelines using domain-level knowledge components
    Boxwala, AA
    Mehta, P
    Peleg, M
    Lacson, R
    Ash, N
    Bury, J
    Shortliffe, EH
    Greenes, RA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2000, : 974 - 974