Quantifying vocabulary learning belief and strategy-A validation study of the Vietnamese version of Gu's (2018) vocabulary learning questionnaire

被引:0
|
作者
Trang, Nguyen Huynh [1 ]
Truong, Duy Vinh [1 ]
Ha, Hung Tan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, Sch Foreign Languages, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[2] Univ Econ Ho Chi Minh City, Sch Foreign Languages, 279 Nguyen Tri Phuong St, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
关键词
Vocabulary learning beliefs; Vocabulary learning strategies; Exploratory factor analyses; Confirmatory factor analyses; Structural equation modeling; COVERAGE; ENGLISH; SIZE; TEXT;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16009
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: The field of language teaching and learning has long recognized the role of vocabulary knowledge in all aspects of language proficiency and indicated that vocabulary beliefs and learning strategies play a pivotal role in learners' vocabulary development. As a result, understanding learners' beliefs and strategies in vocabulary learning is of paramount importance to language teachers. The Vocabulary Learning Questionnaire (VLQ) developed by Peter Gu in 2018 could be considered the most recent, validated instrument for the measurement of vocabulary learning beliefs and strategies. However, the VLQ contains too many items and is only available in English. The objectives of the study, therefore, are (1) to develop and validate a Vietnamese version of the VLQ which can exclude construct-irrelevant noises related to L2 comprehension, and (2) to reduce the number of items while retaining the key factors in the instruments. Methods: 722 Vietnamese university students took part in the study. Exploratory factor analyses (EFA) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were examined with the free software Jamovi 2.3.13. Both Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega were employed to evaluate the factors' internal consistency. Results: Separate EFAs confirmed the two dimensions of vocabulary beliefs, explaining 62.6% of the total variance, and seven factors of vocabulary strategies, predicting 72.1% of the total variance. CFAs confirmed the hypothesized 9-dimensional structures of different vocabulary learning beliefs and strategies and offer cross-validation evidence for the Vietnamese VLQ. Reliability metrics demonstrated acceptable internal reliability for vocabulary belief and strategy sub-scales. Conclusion: The Vietnamese VLQ provides a validated measure of vocabulary beliefs and strategies. The 30-item version of the Vietnamese VLQ serves as a starting point for future research in the field of vocabulary learning and teaching in Vietnam.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条