Capacity development for knowledge mobilization: a scoping review of the concepts and practices

被引:6
|
作者
Golhasany, Hamid [1 ]
Harvey, Blane [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
基金
加拿大魁北克医学研究基金会;
关键词
EVIDENCE-INFORMED PRACTICE; BUILDING CAPACITY; DECISION-MAKING; HEALTH RESEARCH; POLICY-MAKING; TRANSLATION; EDUCATION; EXCHANGE; CARE; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1057/s41599-023-01733-8
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
There is a growing emphasis worldwide on the use of knowledge mobilization (KMb) to improve policies and practices with the latest research evidence. This emphasis calls upon knowledge producers (e.g., university researchers) to produce more relevant evidence, and knowledge users (e.g., practitioners) to access and apply evidence. However, doing KMb can be challenging for these groups without effective support and training. Therefore, individuals and organizations are undertaking capacity development interventions to facilitate the KMb process with more effective support structures, skills, and incentives. Despite its recognized importance, theoretical evidence and practical guidance on capacity development for KMb are scattered across disciplines and practices. To address this, we conducted a scoping review study to review the current practices and concepts and identify significant gaps. One-thousand six-hundred thirty records were gathered, and 105 peer-reviewed and gray literature documents from 2010 to 2020 were reviewed. Two reviewers worked independently in screening the records, and one researcher analyzed the retained documents. The analysis reveals that capacity development for KMb is a multidimensional and multiscalar concept and practice with a diverse range of initiators, initiatives, and beneficiaries. This study also reports on three thematic areas of significance emerging from the literature, namely: (a) individuals' and organizations' challenges in doing and supporting KMb, (b) the capacities and supports deemed needed for effective KMb, and (c) the strategies being used for delivering capacity development. Furthermore, this study identifies evidence gaps related to the process aspects of capacity development for KMb (i.e., planning), capacity development initiatives being undertaken in developing country contexts, and results from more formal evaluations of KMb capacity-building effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Capacity development for knowledge mobilization: a scoping review of the concepts and practices
    Hamid Golhasany
    Blane Harvey
    Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10
  • [2] Capacity Development of Research Ethics Administrators: Scoping Review
    Mulondo, Mutshidzi A.
    Tsoka-Gwegweni, Joyce M.
    LenkaBula, Puleng
    Chikobvu, Perpetual
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS, 2022, 17 (04) : 515 - 524
  • [3] Parents' knowledge and practices of child eye health care: A scoping review
    Ghani, Nor Diyana Hani
    Fadzil, Norliza Mohamad
    Mohammed, Zainora
    Rahman, Mohd Harimi Abd
    Din, Normah Che
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (11):
  • [4] A scoping review of theories, models and frameworks used or proposed to evaluate knowledge mobilization strategies
    Ziam, Saliha
    Lanoue, Severine
    McSween-Cadieux, Esther
    Gervais, Mathieu-Joel
    Lane, Julie
    Gaid, Dina
    Chouinard, Laura Justine
    Dagenais, Christian
    Ridde, Valery
    Jean, Emmanuelle
    Fleury, France Charles
    Hong, Quan Nha
    Prigent, Ollivier
    HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [5] A scoping review of theories, models and frameworks used or proposed to evaluate knowledge mobilization strategies
    Saliha Ziam
    Sèverine Lanoue
    Esther McSween-Cadieux
    Mathieu-Joël Gervais
    Julie Lane
    Dina Gaid
    Laura Justine Chouinard
    Christian Dagenais
    Valéry Ridde
    Emmanuelle Jean
    France Charles Fleury
    Quan Nha Hong
    Ollivier Prigent
    Health Research Policy and Systems, 22
  • [6] Office concepts: A scoping review
    Gjerland, A.
    Soiland, E.
    Thuen, F.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 163
  • [7] Bridging knowledge, policies and practices across the ageing and disability fields: a protocol for a scoping review to inform the development of a taxonomy
    Nalder, Emily Joan
    Putnam, Michelle
    Salvador-Carulla, Luis
    Spindel, Andria
    Batliwalla, Zinnia
    Lenton, Erica
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (10):
  • [8] Practices of patient engagement in drug development: a systematic scoping review
    Zvonareva O.
    Craveț C.
    Richards D.P.
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 8 (1)
  • [9] Concepts and practices for the democratisation of knowledge generation in research partnerships for sustainable development
    Ott, Cordula
    Kiteme, Boniface
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2016, 12 (03): : 405 - 430
  • [10] Scoping review search practices in the social sciences: A scoping review
    Logan, Judith
    Webb, Jenaya
    Singh, Nalini K.
    Tanner, Nailisa
    Barrett, Kathryn
    Wall, Margaret
    Walsh, Benjamin
    Ayala, Ana Patricia
    RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2024, 15 (06) : 950 - 963