Comparative optical performance investigation of Cross Compound Parabolic Concentrators designed with the elimination of multiple reflections principle

被引:2
|
作者
Khalid, Muhammad [1 ,2 ]
Wei, Jinjia [1 ,3 ]
Bakhsh, Sunila [2 ]
Qaisrani, Mumtaz A. [4 ]
Sohail, Muhammad [5 ]
Fang, Jiabin [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Chem Engn & Technol, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Balochistan Univ Informat Technol Engn & Managemen, Dept Phys, Quetta 87300, Pakistan
[3] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, State Key Lab Multiphase Flow Power Engn, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Khwaja Fareed Univ Engn & Informat Technol, Insitute Mech & Mfg Engn, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan
[5] Univ Balochistan, Dept Phys, Quetta 87300, Pakistan
关键词
CPC; Optical efficiency; Elimination of multiple reflections; Optical modelling; Non -uniform solar flux; Material consumption; NONUNIFORM ILLUMINATION; SOLAR CONCENTRATORS; TEMPERATURE; COLLECTORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.solener.2023.04.064
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates low-profile solar concentrators with low-material consumption that improve the optical performance of Crossed-Compound-Parabolic-Concentrators (CCPCs) by using Eliminating-Multiple-Reflections (EMR). Three CCPC designs, LEMR, HEMR, and hybrid, were analysed using Monte-Carlo ray tracing, with optical efficiency and light flux uniformity as primary metrics. The LEMR and HEMR CCPCs achieved almost 88% average optical efficiency at the outlet aperture within the half acceptance angle. At the BCP, the LEMR CCPC attained an average efficiency of 85.7%, while the HEMR CCPC achieved an average efficiency of 85%. The hybrid CCPC achieved an average optical efficiency of 80% and 86% when the incidence angle was varied in the XY and YZ planes. The results showed that the non-uniformity of the light flux at the BCP remained low compared to the outlet aperture with changes in the incidence angle. A material consumption analysis revealed that the LEMR CCPC has the lowest material consumption as compared to the HMR and hybrid CCPCs and has a more uniform irradiance flux at the BCP. The LEMR CCPC has a relatively lower acceptance angle than the HEMR CCPC, making it suitable for a tracking system with a higher concentration ratio. The HEMR CCPC, on the other hand, can be used as a stationary concentrator due to its larger acceptance angle with a lower concentration ratio and can be applied in rooftops and building-integrated photovoltaics. Similarly, the hybrid CCPC has two different ranges of acceptance angles, making it advantageous for use in rooftops and building-integrated photovoltaics with seasonal tracking.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 269
页数:17
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] INVESTIGATION ON THE PREDICTION OF THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF COMPOUND PARABOLIC CONCENTRATORS.
    Hariprasad, C.R.
    Natarajan, R.
    Gupta, M.C.
    Alternative Energy Sources: Proceedings of the Miami International Congress on Energy and the Environment, 1979, 1 : 225 - 238
  • [2] Design and Optical Performance of Compound Parabolic Solar Concentrators with Evacuated Tube as Receivers
    Wang, Qiang
    Wang, Jinfu
    Tang, Runsheng
    ENERGIES, 2016, 9 (10):
  • [3] Optical performance analysis and design optimisation of multisectioned compound parabolic concentrators for photovoltaics application
    Paul, Damasen Ikwaba
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2019, 43 (01) : 358 - 378
  • [4] THERMAL AND OPTICAL-PERFORMANCE TEST-RESULTS FOR COMPOUND PARABOLIC CONCENTRATORS (CPCS)
    SURESH, D
    OGALLAGHER, J
    WINSTON, R
    SOLAR ENERGY, 1990, 44 (05) : 257 - 270
  • [5] Design research and performance analysis of compound parabolic concentrators as optical antennas in visible light communication
    Wang Yun
    Lan Tian
    Li Xiang
    Shen Zhen-Min
    Ni Guo-Qiang
    ACTA PHYSICA SINICA, 2015, 64 (12)
  • [6] Model building and optical performance analysis on a novel designed compound parabolic concentrator
    Gao, Chong
    Chen, Fei
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 209 (209)
  • [7] Design and Optical Performance Evaluation of the Three-Dimensional Solar Concentrators with Multiple Compound Parabolic Profiles and Elliptical and Rectangular Receiver Shapes
    Mboup, Aissatou
    Akisawa, Atsushi
    Pujol-Nadal, Ramon
    Martinez-Moll, Victor
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (03)
  • [8] Optical performance of quasi-stationary, low-concentration, and low-profile compound parabolic concentrators
    Khalid, Muhammad
    Wei, Jinjia
    Zhang, Gaoming
    Xie, Huling
    Fang, Jiabin
    Qaisrani, Mumtaz A.
    Wang, Zexin
    Mujib-Ur-Rehman
    JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2019, 11 (05)
  • [9] Performance investigation of truncated low concentrating photovoltaic-thermal systems with V-trough, compound hyperbolic and compound parabolic concentrators
    Ustaoglu, Abid
    Akgul, Volkan
    Okajima, Junnosuke
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 232
  • [10] Optical, electrical, and thermal performance enhancement for a concentrating photovoltaic/thermal system using optimized polynomial compound parabolic concentrators
    Liu, Huawei
    Zhang, Jiazhen
    Pei, Maoqing
    Ju, Xinyu
    Ju, Xing
    Xu, Chao
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 358