The patient acceptable symptom state for the knee society score, oxford knee score and short form-36 following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

被引:13
|
作者
Goh, Graham S. [1 ]
Liow, Ming Han Lincoln [1 ]
Chen, Jerry Yongqiang [1 ]
Tay, Darren Keng-Jin [1 ]
Lo, Ngai-Nung [1 ]
Yeo, Seng-Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 20 Coll Rd,Level 4, Singapore 169865, Singapore
关键词
Unicompartmental; Knee arthroplasty; Patient-reported outcome measures; Patient acceptable symptom state; Minimal clinically important difference; Satisfaction;
D O I
10.1007/s00167-021-06592-x
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a target value on a patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) scale beyond which patients deem themselves to have attained an acceptable outcome. This study aimed to define the PASS thresholds for generic and knee-specific PROMs at 2 years after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Methods Prospectively collected data of 955 patients who underwent UKA for medial osteoarthritis at a single institution was reviewed. Patients were assessed preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively using the Knee Society Knee Score (KSKS), Function Score (KSFS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS) and Mental Component Score (MCS). Responses to an anchor question assessing patients' overall rating of treatment results were dichotomized and used to determine if PASS was achieved. PASS thresholds for each PROM were selected based on the Youden index on a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Sensitivity analyses were performed for different subgroups (by age, gender, BMI), baseline score tertiles and an alternate definition of PASS. Results In total, 92.7% reported their current state as acceptable. The areas under the curve (AUC) for ROCs were 0.72-0.83, except for the SF-36 PCS (AUC 0.64), indicating good discriminative accuracy of the other PROMs. PASS thresholds were 85.5 for KSKS, 77.5 for KSFS, 41.5 for OKS, 49.9 for SF-36 PCS and 54.6 for SF-36 MCS. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the thresholds were robust. Patients who attained a PASS were at least 4-5 times more likely to be satisfied and have expectations fulfilled. Conclusion PASS thresholds can be used to define treatment success in future outcome studies. At the individual level, they provide clinically relevant benchmarks for surgeons when assessing postoperative recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:1113 / 1122
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The patient acceptable symptom state for the knee society score, oxford knee score and short form-36 following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Graham S. Goh
    Ming Han Lincoln Liow
    Jerry Yongqiang Chen
    Darren Keng-Jin Tay
    Ngai-Nung Lo
    Seng-Jin Yeo
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2023, 31 : 1113 - 1122
  • [2] Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, and 36-Item Short Form Survey Ten Years Following Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
    Tan, Y. C. Jeremy
    Chen, Jerry Y. Q.
    Tay, Darren K. J.
    Lo, Ngai-Nung
    Yeo, Seng-jin
    Liow, M. H. Lincoln
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2024, 39 (06): : 1480 - 1486
  • [3] Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Minimal Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    De Salvatore, Sergio
    Candela, Vincenzo
    Berton, Alessandra
    Casciaro, Carlo
    Sciotti, Gaia
    Cirimele, Giada
    Marchetti, Anna
    Piergentili, Ilaria
    De Marinis, Maria Grazia
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2021, 57 (04):
  • [4] Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the Forgotten Joint Score in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Singh, Vivek
    Fiedler, Benjamin
    Huang, Shengnan
    Oh, Cheongeun
    Karia, Raj J.
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2022, 37 (08): : 1557 - 1561
  • [5] Interpretation threshold values for the Oxford Knee Score in patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
    Harris, Lasse K.
    Troelsen, Anders
    Terluin, Berend
    Gromov, Kirill
    Price, Andrew
    Ingelsrud, Lina H.
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2022, 93 : 634 - 642
  • [6] The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty
    N. D. Clement
    D. MacDonald
    A. H. R. W. Simpson
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2014, 22 : 1933 - 1939
  • [7] The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty
    Clement, N. D.
    MacDonald, D.
    Simpson, A. H. R. W.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2014, 22 (08) : 1933 - 1939
  • [8] Socioeconomic status affects the Oxford knee score and Short-Form 12 score following total knee replacement
    Clement, N. D.
    Jenkins, P. J.
    MacDonald, D.
    Nie, Y. X.
    Patton, J. T.
    Breusch, S. J.
    Howie, C. R.
    Biant, L. C.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2013, 95B (01): : 52 - 58
  • [9] Erratum to: The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty
    N. D. Clement
    D. MacDonald
    A. H. R. W. Simpson
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 3696 - 3696
  • [10] Cost-Benefit Comparison of the Oxford Knee Score and the American Knee Society Score in Measuring Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Medalla, Greg Anthony
    Moonot, Pradeep
    Peel, Tamlyn
    Kalairajah, Yegappan
    Field, Richard E.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2009, 24 (04): : 652 - 656