Estimation of 3T MR Images from 1.5T Images Regularized with Physics Based Constraint

被引:0
|
作者
Kaur, Prabhjot [1 ]
Minhas, Atul Singh [2 ]
Ahuja, Chirag Kamal [3 ]
Sao, Anil Kumar [4 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Mandi, Mandi, Himachal Prades, India
[2] Magnetica, Northgate, Australia
[3] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Chandigarh, India
[4] Indian Inst Technol Bhilai, Bhilai, India
关键词
Low field MRI; 0.25T; 1.5T; 3T; T1 relaxation times; Optimization;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-43999-5_13
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Limited accessibility to high field MRI scanners (such as 7T, 11T) has motivated the development of post-processing methods to improve low field images. Several existing post-processing methods have shown the feasibility to improve 3T images to produce 7T-like images [3,18]. It has been observed that improving lower field (LF, <= 1.5T) images comes with additional challenges due to poor image quality such as the function mapping 1.5T and higher field (HF, 3T) images is more complex than the function relating 3T and 7T images [10]. Except for [10], no method has been addressed to improve <= 1.5T MRI images. Further, most of the existing methods [3,18] including [10] require example images, and also often rely on pixel to pixel correspondences between LF and HF images which are usually inaccurate for <= 1.5T images. The focus of this paper is to address the unsupervised framework for quality improvement of 1.5T images and avoid the expensive requirements of example images and associated image registration. The LF and HF images are assumed to be related by a linear transformation (LT). The unknown HF image and unknown LT are estimated in alternate minimization framework. Further, a physics based constraint is proposed that provides an additional non-linear function relating LF and HF images in order to achieve the desired high contrast in estimated HF image. This constraint exploits the fact that the T1 relaxation time of tissues increases with increase in field strength, and if it is incorporated in the LF acquisition the HF contrast can be simulated. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach provides processed 1.5T images, i.e., estimated 3T-like images with improved image quality, and is comparably better than the existing methods addressing similar problems. The improvement in image quality is also shown to provide better tissue segmentation and volume quantification as compared to scanner acquired 1.5T images. The same set of experiments have also been conducted for 0.25T images to estimate 1.5T images, and demonstrate the advantages of proposed work.
引用
收藏
页码:132 / 141
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COMPARING BETWEEN MR SPECTROSCOPY DONE AT 1.5T AND 3T
    Tang, Phua Hwee
    Nisa, Sameema
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 : 77 - 77
  • [2] Metal artifacts from titanium and steel screws in CT, 1.5T and 3T MR images of the tibial Pilon: a quantitative assessment in 3D
    Radzi, Shairah
    Cowin, Gary
    Robinson, Mark
    Pratap, Jit
    Volp, Andrew
    Schuetz, Michael A.
    Schmutz, Beat
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2014, 4 (03) : 163 - 172
  • [3] Qualitative Comparison of 0.27T, 1.5T, and 3T Magnetic Resonance Images of the Normal Equine Foot
    Bolen, Geraldine
    Audigie, Fabrice
    Spriet, Mathieu
    Vandenberghe, Filip
    Busoni, Valeria
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2010, 30 (01) : 9 - 20
  • [4] What you Need to Know About MR Neuroimaging at 1.5T and 3T
    Tanenbaum, L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 194 (05)
  • [5] Quantitative DCEMRI of the Breast at 1.5T and 3T
    Pineda, F.
    Medved, M.
    Fan, X.
    Ivancevic, M.
    Newstead, G.
    Abe, H.
    Sennett, C.
    Karczmar, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [6] 7T MR of intracranial pathology: Preliminary observations and comparisons to 3T and 1.5T
    Obusez, Emmanuel C.
    Lowe, Mark
    Oh, Se-Hong
    Wang, Irene
    Bullen, Jennifer
    Ruggieri, Paul
    Hill, Virginia
    Lockwood, Daniel
    Emch, Todd
    Moon, Doksu
    Loy, Gareth
    Lee, Jonathan
    Kiczek, Matthew
    Massand, Manoj
    Statsevych, Volodymyr
    Stultz, Todd
    Jones, Stephen E.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 168 : 459 - 476
  • [7] Needle Artifact Localization in 3T MR Images
    DiMaio, S. P.
    Kacher, D. F.
    Ellis, R. E.
    Fichtinger, G.
    Hata, N.
    Zientara, G. P.
    Panych, L. P.
    Kikinis, R.
    Jolesz, F. A.
    MEDICINE MEETS VIRTUAL REALITY 14: ACCELERATING CHANGE IN HEALTHCARE: NEXT MEDICAL TOOLKIT, 2006, 119 : 120 - +
  • [8] MR Diagnosis of Bone Metastases at 1.5T and 3T: Can STIR Imaging Be Omitted?
    Ohlmann-Knafo, S.
    Tarnoki, A. D.
    Tarnoki, D. L.
    Pickuth, D.
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2015, 187 (10): : 924 - 932
  • [9] T1 at 1.5T and 3T compared with conventional T2*at 1.5T for cardiac siderosis
    Alam, Mohammed H.
    Auger, Dominique
    Smith, Gillian C.
    He, Taigang
    Vassiliou, Vassilis
    Baksi, A. John
    Wage, Rick
    Drivas, Peter
    Feng, Yanqiu
    Firmin, David N.
    Pennell, Dudley J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2015, 17
  • [10] T1 at 1.5T and 3T compared with conventional T2* at 1.5T for cardiac siderosis
    Mohammed H. Alam
    Dominique Auger
    Gillian C. Smith
    Taigang He
    Vassilis Vassiliou
    A. John Baksi
    Rick Wage
    Peter Drivas
    Yanqiu Feng
    David N. Firmin
    Dudley J. Pennell
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17