After the Split: Market Efficiency of Bitcoin Cash

被引:1
|
作者
Kim, Hyeonoh [1 ]
Yi, Eojin [2 ]
Jeon, Jooyoung [3 ]
Park, Taeyoung [4 ]
Ahn, Kwangwon [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst S&T Evaluat & Planning, Eumseong Gun, South Korea
[2] ASSIST Univ, Seoul Business Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Future Strategy, Daejeon, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Dept Stat & Data Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Ctr Finance & Technol, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Market efficiency; Quantum harmonic oscillator; Bitcoin Cash; Hard fork; QUANTUM MODEL; PRICE DISCOVERY; OIL PRICE; STOCK; INEFFICIENCY; VOLUME; CRYPTOCURRENCY; FLUCTUATIONS; LIQUIDITY; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1007/s10614-023-10427-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates the weak-form efficient market hypothesis for Bitcoin Cash compared with Bitcoin by applying the concept of quantum harmonic oscillator. Our findings indicate that the Bitcoin Cash market is comparable to, or even more efficient than, the Bitcoin market despite its short history and high market uncertainty. The two most notable conclusions are (i) both Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash markets tend to be bounded mostly at the smallest uncertainty level, indicating that all past prices are reflected in today's price and (ii) the adjustment speed of the log return series to the long-term equilibrium occurs three times faster in the Bitcoin Cash market than in the Bitcoin market. Furthermore, the degree of market integration between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash markets explains why the latter can be considered a fair value on cryptocurrency exchanges. The findings suggest that policymakers must fully consider market synchronization between the original and split markets as well as other key factors, such as supporting technology and market frictions, to prevent regulatory arbitrage.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 427
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bitcoin vs. Bitcoin Cash: Coexistence or Downfall of Bitcoin Cash?
    Kwon, Yujin
    Kim, Hyoungshick
    Shin, Jinwoo
    Kim, Yongdae
    [J]. 2019 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (SP 2019), 2019, : 935 - 951
  • [2] Impact of bitcoin futures on the informational efficiency of bitcoin spot market
    Shynkevich, Andrei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2021, 41 (01) : 115 - 134
  • [3] Some comments on Bitcoin market (in)efficiency
    Dimitrova, V.
    Fernandez-Martinez, M.
    Sanchez-Granero, M. A.
    Trinidad Segovia, J. E.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (07):
  • [4] Market efficiency of cryptocurrency: evidence from the Bitcoin market
    Eojin Yi
    Biao Yang
    Minhyuk Jeong
    Sungbin Sohn
    Kwangwon Ahn
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 13
  • [5] Market efficiency of cryptocurrency: evidence from the Bitcoin market
    Yi, Eojin
    Yang, Biao
    Jeong, Minhyuk
    Sohn, Sungbin
    Ahn, Kwangwon
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [6] Pricing efficiency and market efficiency of two bitcoin funds
    Shynkevich, Andrei
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 27 (20) : 1623 - 1628
  • [7] Efficiency or speculation? A dynamic analysis of the Bitcoin market
    Selmi, Refk
    Tiwari, Aviral Kumar
    Hammoudeh, Shawkat
    [J]. ECONOMICS BULLETIN, 2018, 38 (04): : 2037 - +
  • [8] Effect of introducing Bitcoin futures on the underlying Bitcoin market efficiency: A multifractal analysis
    Ruan, Qingsong
    Meng, Lu
    Lv, Dayong
    [J]. CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2021, 153
  • [9] Contribution of Nonlinear Dynamics to the Informational Efficiency of the Bitcoin Market
    Alvarez-Ramirez, J.
    Castro, L.
    Rodriguez, E.
    [J]. FLUCTUATION AND NOISE LETTERS, 2023, 22 (02):
  • [10] All the frequencies matter in the Bitcoin market: an efficiency analysis
    Vidal-Tomas, David
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2022, 29 (03) : 212 - 218