Physician Preferences when Selecting Candidates for Lower-Quality Kidney Offers

被引:2
|
作者
Sepulveda, Juan M. Gonzalez [1 ,2 ,10 ]
Mehrotra, Sanjay [3 ]
Yang, Jui-Chen [2 ]
Schantz, Karolina J. [4 ]
Becker, Yolanda [5 ,9 ]
Formica, Richard [6 ]
Ladner, Daniela P. [7 ]
Kaufman, Dixon [8 ]
Friedewald, John [7 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, McCormick Sch Engn, Dept Ind Engn & Management Sci, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[4] Vector Psychometr Grp LLC, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Pritzker Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[6] Yale Univ, Yale Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[7] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[8] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[9] Texas Christian Univ, Sch Med, Ft Worth, TX USA
[10] Duke Univ, Populat Hlth Sci, 300 West Morgan St, Durham, NC 27701 USA
关键词
patient-centered care; transplantation; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; PATIENT PREFERENCES; TRANSPLANTATION; BENEFIT; HEALTH;
D O I
10.2215/CJN.0000000000000302
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background In the United States, more than 50% of kidneys in the lowest 15% quality range (those with Kidney Donor Profile Index >85) are discarded. Studies suggest that using more of these kidneys could benefit patients waiting for a transplant. This study assesses the trade-offs physicians make when selecting recipients for lower-quality kidneys.Methods A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was administered to surgeons and nephrologists in the United States who are involved in kidney acceptance decisions. The DCE presented kidneys that varied in terms of Kidney Donor Profile Index, expected cold ischemia time, donor age, pump parameters, serum creatinine levels, glomerulosclerosis, donor diabetes status, and whether donation was made after circulatory death. Candidate characteristics included recipients' age, diabetes history, time on dialysis, ejection fraction, HLA mismatch, calculated panel reactive antibody, and Karnofsky performance score. Regression analysis was used to estimate acceptability weights associated with kidney and recipient characteristics.Results A total of 108 physicians completed the DCE. The likelihood of acceptance was significantly lower with deterioration of kidney quality, expected cold ischemia time at transplantation, and missing biopsy and pump information. Acceptance was prioritized for patients who were higher on the waiting list, younger recipients, those who have spent less time on dialysis, and those without a history of diabetes. Performance status (Karnofsky score) and calculated panel reactive antibody also had a statistically significant but smaller association. Finally, ejection fraction had a marginally significant association, and HLA match had no significant association with the acceptance of marginal kidneys. A group of respondents were found to be primarily concerned about cold ischemia time.Conclusions In this DCE, physicians considered the recipient characteristics that inform expected post-transplant survival score when they decided whether to accept a marginal kidney for a given recipient.
引用
收藏
页码:1599 / 1609
页数:11
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Physician Preferences for Lower-Quality Kidney Offers
    Kelly, Diana
    [J]. CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 18 (12): : 1519 - 1520
  • [3] Patients' preferences for technical versus interpersonal quality when selecting a primary care physician
    Fung, CH
    Elliott, MN
    Hays, RD
    Kahn, KL
    Kanouse, DE
    McGlynn, EA
    Spranca, MD
    Shekelle, PG
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (04) : 957 - 977
  • [4] Patients' preferences for technical versus interpersonal quality when selecting a primary care physician.
    Fung, CH
    Elliott, MN
    Hays, RD
    Kahn, KL
    Kanouse, D
    McGlynn, EA
    Spranca, M
    Shekelle, PG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 : 188 - 188
  • [5] Predicting Waiting Time and Quality of Kidney Offers for Kidney Transplant Candidates
    Jalbert, Jonathan
    Cardinal, Heloise
    Lodi, Andrea
    Weller, Jean-Noel
    Tocco, Hugo-Maxime
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, AIME 2022, 2022, 13263 : 220 - 229
  • [6] Do teaching credentials matter? School leaders' preferences when screening and selecting teacher candidates
    Howard, John E., Jr.
    Mayes, Eric L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 103
  • [7] Female patients' preferences related to interpersonal communications, clinical competence, and gender when selecting a physician
    Mavis, B
    Vasilenko, P
    Schnuth, R
    Marshall, J
    Jeffs, MC
    [J]. ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2005, 80 (12) : 1159 - 1165
  • [8] Solving a Tower's Salt-Plugging Problem: Selecting a lower-quality distributor helped to get rid of the plugging
    Kister, Henry Z.
    Chen, Shihan
    [J]. Chemical Engineering (New York), 2000, 107 (08): : 129 - 133
  • [9] Evaluation of Sequential Urine Analysis when Selecting Candidates for Vesicoamniotic Shunting in Lower Urinary Tract Obstruction
    Koch, Antoine
    Favre, Romain
    Weingertner, Anne-Sophie
    Zaloszyc, Ariane
    Kohler, Monique
    Guerra, Fernando
    Rosenblatt, Jonathan
    Muller, Francoise
    Dreux, Sophie
    Sananes, Nicolas
    [J]. FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2021, 48 (04) : 265 - 271
  • [10] Predicting Time to and Average Quality of Future Offers for Kidney Transplant Candidates Declining a Current Deceased Donor Kidney Offer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Jalbert, Jonathan
    Weller, Jean-Noel
    Boivin, Pierre-Luc
    Lavigne, Sylvain
    Taobane, Mehdi
    Pieper, Mike
    Lodi, Andrea
    Cardinal, Heloise
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2023, 10