Deep Learning Prediction for Distal Aortic Remodeling After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection

被引:1
|
作者
Zhou, Min [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luo, Xiaoyuan [4 ,5 ]
Wang, Xia [6 ]
Xie, Tianchen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Yonggang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shi, Zhenyu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Manning [4 ,5 ]
Fu, Weiguo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, 180 Fenglin Rd, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Inst Vasc Surg, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Natl Clin Res Ctr Intervent Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Fudan Univ, Digital Med Res Ctr, Sch Basic Med Sci, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Key Lab Med Imaging Comp & Comp Assisted, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ Affiliated Peoples Hosp 6, Dept Ultrasound Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
aortic dissection; aortic remodeling; deep learning; computed tomography angiography; ENLARGEMENT;
D O I
10.1177/15266028231160101
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This study aimed to develop a deep learning model for predicting distal aortic remodeling after proximal thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) using computed tomography angiography (CTA). Methods: A total of 147 patients with acute or subacute TBAD who underwent proximal TEVAR at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. The boundary of aorta was manually segmented, and the point clouds of each aorta were obtained. Prediction of negative aortic remodeling or reintervention was accomplished by a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a point cloud neural network (PC-NN), respectively. The discriminatory value of the established models was mainly evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the test set. Results: The mean follow-up time was 34.0 months (range: 12-108 months). During follow-up, a total of 25 (17.0%) patients were identified as having negative aortic remodeling, and 16 (10.9%) patients received reintervention. The AUC (0.876) by PC-NN for predicting negative aortic remodeling was superior to that obtained by CNN (0.612, p=0.034) and similar to the AUC by PC-NN combined with clinical features (0.884, p=0.92). As to reintervention, the AUC by PC-NN was significantly higher than that by CNN (0.805 vs 0.579; p=0.042), and AUCs by PC-NN combined with clinical features and PC-NN alone were comparable (0.836 vs 0.805; p=0.81). Conclusion: The CTA-based deep learning algorithms may assist clinicians in automated prediction of distal aortic remodeling after TEVAR for acute or subacute TBAD. Clinical Impact: Negative aortic remodeling is the leading cause of late reintervention after proximal thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD), and possesses great challenge to endovascular repair. Early recognizing high-risk patients is of supreme importance for optimizing the follow-up interval and therapy strategy. Currently, clinicians predict the prognosis of these patients based on several imaging signs, which is subjective. The computed tomography angiography-based deep learning algorithms may incorporate abundant morphological information of aorta, provide with a definite and objective output value, and finally assist clinicians in automated prediction of distal aortic remodeling after TEVAR for acute or subacute TBAD.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk factors associated with aortic remodeling in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair
    Wang, X. L.
    Huang, H. Y.
    Li, Z.
    Yu, Y. S.
    Hu, Y. Q.
    Ye, W. X.
    Hua, F.
    Chen, Y. H.
    Ni, H.
    Ding, Q. W.
    Shen, Z. Y.
    [J]. GENETICS AND MOLECULAR RESEARCH, 2015, 14 (04) : 11692 - 11699
  • [2] Predicting Aortic Remodeling After Thoracic Aortic Endovascular Repair for Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection Using Aortic Wall Thickness Ratios
    Vasquez, Jesus F.
    Mousavi, Idine
    McKinsey, James F.
    Marin, Michael L.
    Faries, Peter L.
    Han, Daniel K.
    Ravin, Reid
    Tadros, Rami O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 69 (06) : E131 - E131
  • [3] Aortic Remodeling After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Nonacute Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissection
    Nomura, Yoshikatsu
    Kawasaki, Ryota
    Koide, Yutaka
    Okada, Tasuku
    Yasumori, Ken
    Sakamoto, Toshihito
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Murakami, Hirohisa
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2024, 99 : 209 - 216
  • [4] Retrospective analysis of factors associated with aortic remodeling in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair
    Yu, Biao
    Li, Tangzhiming
    Liu, Huadong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [5] Retrospective analysis of factors associated with aortic remodeling in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair
    Biao Yu
    Tangzhiming Li
    Huadong Liu
    [J]. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 16
  • [6] Aortic remodeling in Type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair with an aortic extender cuff implantation
    Zhang, Honggang
    Qiao, Tong
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2018, 13 : 2359 - 2366
  • [7] Aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular repair of acute uncomplicated type B aortic dissection
    Mohamed, Hany A.
    Tawfik, Ahmed R.
    Ali, Mohammed
    Ali, Rana K.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 38 (02): : 239 - 244
  • [8] Favorable aortic remodeling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for complicated acute type B aortic dissection
    Ray, Hunter M.
    Tjaden, Bruce L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 71 (01) : 255 - 256
  • [9] Abdominal Aortic Remodeling After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B (DeBakey IIIb) Aortic Dissection
    Ray, Hunter M.
    Ocazionez, Daniel
    Miller, Charles C., III
    Sandhu, Harleen K.
    Saqib, Naveed U.
    Charlton-Ouw, Kristofer M.
    Safi, Hazim J.
    Azizzadeh, Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 69 (06) : E238 - E239
  • [10] Predicting reintervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair of Stanford type B aortic dissection using machine learning
    Dong, Yuhao
    Que, Lifeng
    Jia, Qianjun
    Xi, Yue
    Zhuang, Jian
    Li, Jinglei
    Liu, Hui
    Chen, Weiqi
    Huang, Meiping
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2022, 32 (01) : 355 - 367