Clinical efficacy of styloid incision truncation via percutaneous punching in treating styloid process syndrome

被引:0
|
作者
Zheng, Yuebin [1 ]
Yan, Bincheng [1 ]
Zhong, Huacai [1 ]
Yi, Wang [1 ]
Yang, Yirong [1 ]
Wang, Qian [1 ]
机构
[1] Zigong First Peoples Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Head & Neck Surg, 42, Shangyi Haozhi Rd, Zigong 643000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Styloid process; Percutaneous punching; Styloid incision truncation; Clinical efficacy; EAGLE SYNDROME; PAIN;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-022-03486-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To clarify the clinical efficacy of styloid incision truncation via percutaneous punching in treating styloid process (styloid) syndrome. Methods The clinical data of 40 styloid syndrome patients treated in our hospital from July 2018 to August 2021 were chosen and divided into an observation group and a control group in a random manner, with 20 cases in each. The control group received treatment with styloid truncation via an external cervical approach, and the observation group received treatment with styloid incision truncation via percutaneous punching. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, length of truncated styloid, clinical efficacy, pain scores, postoperative complications and inflammatory cytokine levels were assessed in the both groups. Results The intraoperative blood loss, operation time, length of truncated styloid and hospital stay in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). VAS pain scores were higher in both groups after the operation compared to before the operation. However, the observation group showed a statistically significant reduction in comparison with the control group (P < 0.05). The treatment effectiveness and complication rates of the two groups exhibited significant differences (P < 0.05). After the operation, TNF-alpha, CRP, and IL-6 levels in both groups were elevated compared to those before the operation. The observation group, however, showed significant depletion compared to the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Styloid incision truncation via percutaneous punching was not only effective in treating styloid syndrome, but also caused less trauma and fewer complications. It promotes patient recovery and requires a simple operation, making it worthy of promotion in hospitals.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical efficacy of styloid incision truncation via percutaneous punching in treating styloid process syndrome
    Yuebin Zheng
    Bincheng Yan
    Huacai Zhong
    Wang Yi
    Yirong Yang
    Qian Wang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 18
  • [2] A CONTRIBUTION TO STUDY OF VARIATIONS OF STYLOID PROCESS IN CONNECTION WITH STYLOID SYNDROME
    BUDISAVL.R
    ACTA ANATOMICA, 1965, 61 (03): : 456 - &
  • [3] STYLOID PROCESS AND EAGLES SYNDROME
    PIETTE, E
    HARKEMANNE, JM
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGIE, 1986, 35 (10): : 483 - 494
  • [4] ELONGATED STYLOID PROCESS SYNDROME - INTRAORAL VERSUS EXTERNAL APPROACH FOR STYLOID SURGERY
    STRAUSS, M
    ZOHAR, Y
    LAURIAN, N
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 1985, 95 (08): : 976 - 979
  • [5] Eagle syndrome: elongation of the styloid process
    Zanfardini, Andres
    Manuel Duarte, Juan
    MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES, 2018, 78 (05) : 381 - 381
  • [6] ELONGATED STYLOID PROCESS AND EAGLES SYNDROME
    MONTALBETTI, L
    FERRANDI, D
    PERGAMI, P
    SAVOLDI, F
    CEPHALALGIA, 1995, 15 (02) : 80 - 93
  • [7] Elongated styloid process (Eagle's syndrome): A clinical study
    Prasad, KC
    Kamath, MP
    Reddy, KJM
    Raju, K
    Agarwal, S
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2002, 60 (02) : 171 - 175
  • [8] PATHOGENESIS AND CLINICAL MANIFESTATION OF THE STYLOID SYNDROME
    RIEDIGER, D
    EHRENFELD, M
    DEUTSCHE ZAHNARZTLICHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 1989, 44 (12): : 968 - 970
  • [9] Eagle's Syndrome: A Novel Surgical Approach to the Styloid Process Using a Preauricular Incision
    Williams, John V.
    McKearney, Richard M.
    Revington, Peter J.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2011, 69 (06) : 1617 - 1622