Antenatal and intrapartum care for women with gestational diabetes: a best practice implementation project

被引:0
|
作者
Stan, Daniela [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mazilu, Doina C. [1 ,2 ]
Zazu, Mariana [1 ]
Nedelcu, Viorica [1 ]
Teodor, Monica [3 ]
Bratila, Elvira [2 ,3 ]
Vrbova, Tereza [4 ,5 ]
Klugar, Miloslav [4 ,5 ]
Klugarova, Jitka [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Romanian Ctr Nursing Res, Order Nurses Midwives & Med Assistants Romania Buc, JBI Ctr Excellence, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Carol Davila Univ Med & Pharm, Bucharest, Romania
[3] Clin Hosp Obstet & Gynecol Prof Dr Panait Sarbu, Bucharest, Romania
[4] Inst Hlth Informat & Stat Czech Republ, Czech GRADE Network, Czech Republic JBI Ctr Excellence, Cochrane Czech Republ, Prague, Czech Republic
[5] Masaryk Univ, Inst Biostat & Anal, Fac Med, Brno, Czech Republic
来源
关键词
evidence-based practice; gestational diabetes; implementation project; midwives; nurses; PREVALENCE; MELLITUS;
D O I
10.1097/XEB.0000000000000392
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives:This project aimed to improve the quality of antenatal and intrapartum care for women with gestational diabetes (GD) by increasing nursing and midwifery care compliance with best practice recommendations.Introduction:GD is one of the most common diseases that can lead to several important maternal and fetal complications.Methods:This project was based on JBI's evidence implementation approach and included a baseline audit, the implementation of strategies, and a follow-up audit. The project was conducted in an obstetrics-gynecology department of a hospital in Bucharest, and the sample included 30 pregnant women with GD from that ward.Results:Regarding antenatal care, the baseline audit revealed low compliance (63%-87%) for criterion 2 (specific education), criterion 3 (multidisciplinary team), criterion 4 (individualized care plan), criterion 5 (training on self-monitoring), criterion 8 (dietician consultation), and criterion 10 (physical exercise program). Compliance with criterion 9 (physiotherapist consultation) was nil. Higher compliance (90%-100%) was reported for criterion 1 (screening for GD), criterion 6 (self-monitoring), and criterion 7 (maintenance of glycemic values). The intrapartum care audit criteria regarding maintaining blood glucose levels had compliance rates of 97% (criteria 13 and 14), 73% (criterion 11), and 67% (criterion 12). As a result of implementing the most appropriate strategies, maximum improvement was observed for all 12 audit criteria found to be deficient in the baseline audit.Conclusions:Strategies were identified and applied to successfully implement the best practices (educational programs and improved procedures). However, specific actions, such as regular targeted audits and continuous monitoring, are needed to maintain long-term results.
引用
收藏
页码:S38 / S46
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Enhancing bladder management for intrapartum/postpartum women at a maternity hospital in Taiwan: a best practice implementation project
    Pan, Wan-Lin
    Chen, Li-Li
    Wang, Chia-Hui
    Mu, Pei-Fan
    Tsay, Shwu-Feng
    Gau, Meei-Ling
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION, 2023, 21 (03): : 197 - 207
  • [2] Translation of a gestational diabetes nutrition model of care into practice: results from an implementation project
    Shelley Wilkinson
    Sally McCray
    Michael Beckmann
    H David McIntyre
    [J]. BMC Health Services Research, 14 (Suppl 2)
  • [3] Compliance to antenatal psychosocial assessment practice among midwives: a best practice implementation project
    Tessema, Marta
    Birhanu, Dagmawit
    Mizana, Biru Abdissa
    Belay, Admasu
    Tura, Gurmesa
    Abera, Muluemebet
    Birhanu, Zewdie
    Feyissa, Garumma Tolu
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION, 2022, 20 (01): : 44 - 52
  • [4] Evaluation of the implementation of a best practice gestational diabetes model of care in two Australian metropolitan services
    Wilkinson, Shelley A.
    Palmer, Michelle
    Smith, Shelley
    Porteous, Helen
    McCray, Sally
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION, 2022, 20 (01): : 10 - 20
  • [5] Perioperative diabetes management of adult patients with diabetes: a best practice implementation project
    Chen, Tanghua
    Kumaran, Suji
    Vigh, Gia
    Astorga, Cecilia
    Beehan, Sean
    Burrell, Maria
    Deakin, Gail
    Kernahan, Carmen
    Lambrakis, Paul
    Loader, Joanne
    Ly, Nakim
    Nguyen, Mark
    Pasco, Kristofer
    Perry, Mary
    Richter, Matthew
    Russell, Hamish
    Smith, Frances
    Venzon, Raquel
    Vernon, Amanda
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE IMPLEMENTATION, 2022, 20 (01): : 72 - 86
  • [6] Intrapartum and perinatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes and mild gestational hyperglycemia
    Gajjar, F.
    Maitra, N. K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2005, 55 (02): : 135 - 137
  • [7] Evaluation of a process of implementation of a gestational diabetes nutrition model of care into practice
    Wilkinson, Shelley A.
    McCray, Sally
    Beckmann, Michael
    McIntyre, H. David
    [J]. NUTRITION & DIETETICS, 2016, 73 (04) : 329 - 335
  • [8] Antenatal models of care for women with gestational diabetes mellitus: Vignettes from an international meeting
    Sina, Maryam
    Cade, Thomas J.
    Flack, Jeff
    Nolan, Christopher J.
    Rajagopal, Rohit
    Wong, Vincent
    Burcher, Linda
    Barry, Alison
    Gianatti, Emily
    McCarthy, Ana
    McNamara, Catharine
    Mickelson, Marina
    Hughes, Ruth
    Jones, Tara
    Latino, Cathy
    McIntyre, David
    Price, Sarah
    Simmons, David
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 60 (05): : 720 - 728
  • [9] Assessment Of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus And Associated Factors Among Women Attending Antenatal Care
    Patil, Sanjay Kumar
    Patil, Yamini
    Pawar, Gauri Shinde
    Laddad, Manisha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL NEGATIVE RESULTS, 2022, 13 : 357 - 359
  • [10] Assessment Of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus And Associated Factors Among Women Attending Antenatal Care
    Patil, Sanjay Kumar
    Patil, Yamini
    Pawar, Gauri Shinde
    Laddad, Manisha
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL NEGATIVE RESULTS, 2022, 13 : 357 - 359