Riparian forest response to extreme drought is influenced by climatic context and canopy structure

被引:8
|
作者
Portela, Ana Paula [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Goncalves, Joao F. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Durance, Isabelle [5 ,6 ]
Vieira, Cristiana [7 ]
Honrado, Joao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Ctr Invest Biodiversidade & Recursos Genet, InBIO Lab Associado, CIBIO, Campus Vairao, P-4485661 Vairao, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Ciencias, Dept Biol, P-4099002 Porto, Portugal
[3] CIBIO, BIOPOLIS Program Genom Biodivers & Land Planning, Campus Vairao, P-4485661 Vairao, Portugal
[4] Inst Politecn Viana Castelo IPVC, proMetheus Res Unit Mat Energy & Environm Sustaina, Ave Atlant, 644, P-4900348 Viana Do Castelo, Portugal
[5] Cardiff Univ, Water Res Inst, Sir Martin Evans Bldg, Museum Ave, Cardiff CF10 3AX, Wales
[6] Cardiff Univ, Sch Biosci, Sir Martin Evans Bldg, Museum Ave, Cardiff CF10 3AX, Wales
[7] Univ Porto, Museu Hist Nat & Ciencia, MHNC UP, UPorto,PRISC, Praca Gomes Teixeira, P-4099002 Porto, Portugal
关键词
Resilience; Resistance; Recovery; Climate change; Canopy water content; Primary productivity; FUNCTIONAL DIVERSITY; WATER; TRAIT; ECOSYSTEMS; RESISTANCE; VEGETATION; DYNAMICS; PATTERNS; DATABASE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163128
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Droughts significantly impact forest ecosystems, reducing forest health and productivity, compromising ecosystem functioning, and nature-based solutions for climate change. The response and resilience of riparian forests to drought are poorly understood despite their key role in the functioning of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Here we investi-gate riparian forest drought responses and resilience to an extreme drought event at a regional scale. We also examine how drought event characteristics, average climate conditions, topography, soil, vegetation structure, and functional diversity shape the resilience of riparian forests to drought. We used a time series of the Normalized Difference Vege-tation Index (NDVI) and Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) to calculate the resistance to and recovery after an extreme drought (2017-2018) in 49 sites across an Atlantic-Mediterranean climate gradient in North Portugal. We used generalized additive models and multi-model inference to understand which factors best explained drought re-sponses. We found a trade-off between drought resistance and recovery (maximum r = -0.5) and contrasting strate-gies across the climatic gradient of the study area. Riparian forests in the Atlantic regions showed comparatively higher resistance, while Mediterranean forests recovered more. Canopy structure and climate context were the most relevant predictors of resistance and recovery. However, median NDVI and NDWI had not returned to pre-drought levels (RcNDWI mean = 1.21, RcNDVI mean = 1.01) three years after the event. Our study shows that riparian forests have contrasting drought response strategies and may be susceptible to extended legacy effects associated with extreme and/or recurring droughts, similarly to upland forests. This work highlights the drought vulnerability of riparian eco-systems and emphasises the need for further studies on long-term resilience to droughts.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Amazon drought and forest response: Largely reduced forest photosynthesis but slightly increased canopy greenness during the extreme drought of 2015/2016
    Yang, Jia
    Tian, Hanqin
    Pan, Shufen
    Chen, Guangsheng
    Zhang, Bowen
    Dangal, Shree
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (05) : 1919 - 1934
  • [2] Local groundwater decline exacerbates response of dryland riparian woodlands to climatic drought
    Williams, Jared
    Stella, John C.
    Voelker, Steven L.
    Lambert, Adam M.
    Pelletier, Lissa M.
    Drake, John E.
    Friedman, Jonathan M.
    Roberts, Dar A.
    Singer, Michael Bliss
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (22) : 6771 - 6788
  • [3] Adaptation strategies of desert riparian forest vegetation in response to drought stress
    Chen, Yaning
    Zhou, Honghua
    Chen, Yapeng
    ECOHYDROLOGY, 2013, 6 (06) : 956 - 973
  • [4] Climatic response and impacts of drought on oaks at urban and forest sites
    Gillner, Sten
    Vogt, Juliane
    Roloff, Andreas
    URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2013, 12 (04) : 597 - 605
  • [5] Light environment in the understory of an Andean cloud forest: canopy structure and climatic seasonality
    Quevedo, Ana
    Schwarzkopf, Teresa
    Garcia, Carlos
    Jerez, Mauricio
    REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA TROPICAL, 2016, 64 (04) : 1699 - 1707
  • [6] Sudden forest canopy collapse corresponding with extreme drought and heat in a mediterranean-type eucalypt forest in southwestern Australia
    George Matusick
    Katinka X. Ruthrof
    Niels C. Brouwers
    Bernard Dell
    Giles St. J. Hardy
    European Journal of Forest Research, 2013, 132 : 497 - 510
  • [7] Sudden forest canopy collapse corresponding with extreme drought and heat in a mediterranean-type eucalypt forest in southwestern Australia
    Matusick, George
    Ruthrof, Katinka X.
    Brouwers, Niels C.
    Dell, Bernard
    Hardy, Giles St J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2013, 132 (03) : 497 - 510
  • [8] Measuring canopy loss and climatic thresholds from an extreme drought along a fivefold precipitation gradient across Texas
    Schwantes, Amanda M.
    Swenson, Jennifer J.
    Gonzalez-Roglich, Mariano
    Johnson, Daniel M.
    Domec, Jean-Christophe
    Jackson, Robert B.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2017, 23 (12) : 5120 - 5135
  • [9] Canopy Composition and Forest Structure Provide Restoration Targets for Low-Order Riparian Ecosystems
    Rheinhardt, Richard D.
    McKenney-Easterling, M.
    Brinson, Mark M.
    Masina-Rubbo, Jennifer
    Brooks, Robert P.
    Whigham, Dennis F.
    O'Brien, David
    Hite, Jeremy T.
    Armstrong, Brian K.
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2009, 17 (01) : 51 - 59
  • [10] Bryophyte response to forest canopy treatments within the riparian zone of high-elevation small streams
    Baldwin, L. K.
    Petersen, C. L.
    Bradfield, G. E.
    Jones, W. M.
    Black, S. T.
    Karakatsoulis, J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2012, 42 (01) : 141 - 156