Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control for a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process

被引:0
|
作者
Hussain, S. Zahid [1 ]
Kausar, Zareena [1 ]
Koreshi, Zafar Ullah [1 ]
Shah, Muhammad Faizan [2 ]
Abdullah, Ahmd [1 ]
Farooq, Muhammad Umer [2 ]
机构
[1] Air Univ, Dept Mechatron & Biomed Engn, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
[2] Khwaja Fareed Univ Engn & Informat Technol, Inst Mech & Mfg Engn, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan
关键词
additive manufacturing; selective laser melting; process modeling; disturbance modeling; disturbance rejection; process control; PRECISION MOTION CONTROL; FEEDBACK-CONTROL; PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.3390/electronics12020471
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Functional metal parts with complicated geometry and internal features for the aerospace and automotive industries can be created using the laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing (AM) technique. However, the lack of uniform quality of the produced parts in terms of strength limits its enormous potential for general adoption in industries. Most of the defects in selective laser melting (SLM) parts are associated with a nonuniform melt pool size. The melt pool area may fluctuate in spite of constant SLM processing parameters, like laser power, laser speed, hatching distance, and layer thickness. This is due to heat accumulation in the current track from previously scanned tracks in the current layer. The feedback control strategy is a promising tool for maintaining the melt pool dimensions. In this study, a dynamic model of the melt pool cross-sectional area is considered. The model is based on the energy balance of lumped melt pool parameters. Energy coming from previously scanned tracks is considered a source of disturbance for the current melt pool cross-section area in the control algorithm. To track the reference melt pool area and manage the disturbances and uncertainties, a linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC) strategy is considered. The LADRC control technique is more successful in terms of rapid reference tracking and disturbance rejection when compared to the conventional PID controller. The simulation study shows that an LADRC control strategy presents a 65% faster time response than the PID, a 97% reduction in the steady state error, and a 98% reduction in overshoot. The integral time absolute error (ITAE) performance index shows 95% improvement for reference tracking of the melt pool area in SLM. In terms of reference tracking and robustness, LADRC outperforms the PID controller and ensures that the melt pool size remains constant.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] APPLICATION OF DIGITAL TWINS TO LASER POWDER BED FUSION ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING PROCESS CONTROL
    Yeung, Ho
    Kim, Felix
    Donmez, Alkan
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 18TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, MSEC2023, VOL 1, 2023,
  • [2] Additive manufacturing of glass with laser powder bed fusion
    Datsiou, Kyriaki Corinna
    Saleh, Ehab
    Spirrett, Fiona
    Goodridge, Ruth
    Ashcroft, Ian
    Eustice, Dave
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2019, 102 (08) : 4410 - 4414
  • [3] IN-PROCESS DATA INTEGRATION FOR LASER POWDER BED FUSION ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
    Perisic, Milica
    Lu, Yan
    Jones, Albert
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, IDETC-CIE2022, VOL 2, 2022,
  • [4] Defect structure process maps for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Gordon, Jerard, V
    Narra, Sneha P.
    Cunningham, Ross W.
    Liu, He
    Chen, Hangman
    Suter, Robert M.
    Beuth, Jack L.
    Rollett, Anthony D.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 36
  • [5] Powder bed fusion process in additive manufacturing: An overview
    Singh, Riya
    Gupta, Akash
    Tripathi, Ojestez
    Srivastava, Sashank
    Singh, Bharat
    Awasthi, Ankita
    Rajput, S. K.
    Sonia, Pankaj
    Singhal, Piyush
    Saxena, Kuldeep K.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 26 : 3058 - 3070
  • [6] A technical review of the challenges of powder recycling in the laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process
    Soundarapandiyan, Gowtham
    Johnston, Carol
    Khan, Raja H. U.
    Chen, Bo
    Fitzpatrick, Michael E.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING-JOE, 2021, 2021 (02): : 97 - 103
  • [7] Metal additive manufacturing by laser-powder bed fusion:Guidelines for process optimisation
    Obeidi, Muhannad Ahmed
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 15
  • [8] A cybermanufacturing and AI framework for laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) additive manufacturing process
    Amini, Mohammadhossein
    Chang, Shing, I
    Rao, Prahalada
    MANUFACTURING LETTERS, 2019, 21 : 41 - 44
  • [9] Process optimization of complex geometries using feed forward control for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Druzgalski, C. L.
    Ashby, A.
    Guss, G.
    King, W. E.
    Roehling, T. T.
    Matthews, M. J.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 34
  • [10] Model-based feedforward control of laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
    Wang, Qian
    Michaleris, Panagiotis
    Nassar, Abdalla R.
    Irwin, Jeffrey E.
    Ren, Yong
    Stutzman, Christopher B.
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2020, 31