Geriatric Assessment in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review

被引:1
|
作者
Cauley, Christy E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,10 ]
Samost-Williams, Aubrey [3 ,4 ]
Philpotts, Lisa [5 ]
Brindle, Mary [1 ,3 ]
Cooper, Zara [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Ritchie, Christine S. [2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Boston, MA USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Mongan Inst Ctr Aging & Serious Illness, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia Crit Care & Pain Med, Boston, MA USA
[5] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Treadwell Lib, Boston, MA USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[7] Marcus Inst Aging Res, Boston, MA USA
[8] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Surg, Boston, MA USA
[9] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Div Palliat Care & Geriatr, Boston, MA USA
[10] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, 15 Parkman St WACC 460, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
Colorectal; Geriatric assessment; Geriatric conditions; Surgery; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; CLINICAL-PRACTICE GUIDELINES; OLDER-ADULTS; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; AMERICAN SOCIETY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FOLLOW-UP; CANCER; FRAILTY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2023.12.055
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The prevalence of colorectal surgery among older adults is expected to rise due to the aging population. Geriatric conditions (e.g., frailty) are risk factors for poor surgical outcomes. The goal of this systematic review is to examine how current literature describes geriatric assessment interventions in colorectal surgery and associated outcomes. Methods: Systematic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were completed. Review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta -Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and prospectively registered in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews in health and social care. All cohort studies and randomized trials of adult colorectal surgery patients where geriatric assessment was performed were included. Geriatric assessment with/without management interventions were identified and described. Results: Seven-hundred ninety-three studies were identified. Duplicates (197) were removed. An additional 525 were excluded after title/abstract review. After full-text review, 20 studies met the criteria. Reference list review increased final total to 25 studies. All 25 studies were cohort studies. No randomized clinical trials were identified. Heterogeneous assessments were organized into geriatrics domains (mind, mobility, medications, matters most, and multicomplexity). Incomplete evaluations across geriatric domains were performed with few studies describing the use of assessments to impact management decisions. Conclusions: There are no randomized trials assessing the impact of geriatric assessment to tailor management strategies and improve outcomes in colorectal surgery. Few studies performed assessments to evaluate the geriatric domain matters most. These findings represent a gap in evidence for the efficacy of geriatric assessment and management strategies in colorectal surgical care. 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 734
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendectomy- a systematic review
    Hertz, Peter
    Rattenborg, Soren
    Haug, Tora R.
    Houlind, Kim
    Konge, Lars
    Bjerrum, Flemming
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2024, 26 (04) : 597 - 608
  • [2] Assessment methods in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review of available instruments
    van Zwieten, Tom
    Okkema, Sietske
    van Det, Marc
    Pereboom, Ilona
    Veeger, Nic
    Pierie, Jean-Pierre
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [3] Assessment methods in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review of available instruments
    Tom van Zwieten
    Sietske Okkema
    Marc van Det
    Ilona Pereboom
    Nic Veeger
    Jean-Pierre Pierie
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [4] Geriatric assessment among elderly patients undergoing urological surgery: A systematic literature review
    Michalik, Cyprian
    Juszczak, Kajetan
    Maciukiewicz, Piotr
    Drewa, Tomasz
    Kenig, Jakub
    ADVANCES IN CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2020, 29 (03): : 399 - 407
  • [5] Geriatric assessment in surgical oncology: A systematic review
    Feng, Megan A.
    McMillan, Daniel T.
    Crowell, Karen
    Muss, Hyman
    Nielsen, Matthew E.
    Smith, Angela B.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 193 (01) : 265 - 272
  • [6] Re: Geriatric Assessment among Elderly Patients Undergoing Urological Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review
    不详
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (04): : 1203 - 1203
  • [7] A systematic review of the implementation of geriatric assessment in cancer care
    Raesima, Mmakgomo
    Rasekaba, Tshepo
    Steer, Christopher
    Blackberry, Irene
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 20 : 226 - 227
  • [8] Re: Geriatric Assessment in Surgical Oncology: A Systematic Review
    Griebling, Tomas L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : 1079 - +
  • [9] Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review
    James W. Garrard
    Natalie J. Cox
    Richard M. Dodds
    Helen C. Roberts
    Avan A. Sayer
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2020, 32 : 197 - 205
  • [10] Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review
    Garrard, James W.
    Cox, Natalie J.
    Dodds, Richard M.
    Roberts, Helen C.
    Sayer, Avan A.
    AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2020, 32 (02) : 197 - 205