Overcoming Barriers to the Implementation of Integrated Musculoskeletal Pain Management Programs: A Multi-Stakeholder Qualitative Study

被引:3
|
作者
Lentz, Trevor A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
-Smith, Jonathan Gonzalez [3 ,4 ]
Huber, Katie [3 ,4 ]
Goertz, Christine [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bleser, William K. [3 ,4 ]
Saunders, Robert [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Durham, NC USA
[2] Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Ctr Hlth Policy, Durham, NC USA
[4] Duke Univ, Ctr Hlth Policy, Washington, DC USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 300 W Morgan St, Durham, NC 27701 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PAIN | 2023年 / 24卷 / 05期
关键词
Qualitative research; chronic pain; health care organizations and systems; integrated delivery systems; payment; CARE; OPIOIDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpain.2022.12.015
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Integrated pain management (IPM) programs can help to reduce the substantial population health burden of musculoskeletal pain, but are poorly implemented. Lessons learned from existing programs can inform efforts to expand IPM implementation. This qualitative study describes how health care systems, payers, providers, health policy researchers, and other stakeholders are overcoming barriers to developing and sustaining IPM programs in real-world settings. Primary data were collected February 2020 through September 2021 from a multi-sector expert panel of 25 stakeholders, 53 expert interviews representing 30 distinct IPM programs across the United States, and 4 original case studies of exemplar IPM programs. We use a consensual team-based approach to systematically analyze qualitative findings. We identified 4 major themes around challenges and potential solutions for implementing IPM programs: navigating coverage, payment, and reimbursement; enacting organizational change; making a business case to stakeholders; and overcoming regulatory hurdles. Strategies to address payment challenges included use of group visits, linked visits between billable and nonbillable providers, and development of value-based payment models. Organizational change strategies included engagement of clinical and administrative champions and co-location of services. Business case strategies involved demonstrating the ability to initially break even and potential to reduce downstream costs, while improving nonfinancial outcomes like patient satisfaction and provider burnout. Regulatory hurdles were overcome with innovative credentialing methods by leveraging available waivers and managed care contracting to expand access to IPM services. Lessons from existing programs provide direction on to grow and support such IPM delivery models across a variety of settings. Perspective: Integrated pain management (IPM) programs face numerous implementation challenges related to payment, organizational change, care coordination, and regulatory requirements. Drawing on real-world experiences of existing programs and from diverse IPM stakeholders, we outline actionable strategies that health care systems, providers, and payers can use to expand implementation of these programs. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of United States Association for the Study of Pain, Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
下载
收藏
页码:860 / 873
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated water management
    Lankford, Bruce
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 51 (02) : 321 - 322
  • [2] Multi-stakeholder platforms for integrated water management
    Rennie, Hamish
    AUSTRALIAN PLANNER, 2010, 47 (03) : 221 - 223
  • [3] Identifying barriers to Implementation of New Care Models, a Multi-Stakeholder Engagement Study
    Carroll, Aine
    Twomey, Valerie
    White, Barry
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2018, 18
  • [4] Overcoming barriers to the adoption of locating technologies in dementia care: A multi-stakeholder focus group study
    Freiesleben, S. D.
    Megges, H.
    Herrmann, C.
    Wessel, L.
    Peters, O.
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GERONTOLOGIE UND GERIATRIE, 2022, 55 (SUPPL 1): : 150 - 151
  • [5] Overcoming barriers to the adoption of locating technologies in dementia care: a multi-stakeholder focus group study
    Silka Dawn Freiesleben
    Herlind Megges
    Christina Herrmann
    Lauri Wessel
    Oliver Peters
    BMC Geriatrics, 21
  • [6] Overcoming barriers to the adoption of locating technologies in dementia care: a multi-stakeholder focus group study
    Freiesleben, Silka Dawn
    Megges, Herlind
    Herrmann, Christina
    Wessel, Lauri
    Peters, Oliver
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [7] WORK PARTICIPATION OF PEOPLE WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS IN IRELAND: A QUALITATIVE MULTI-STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS
    Robinson, K.
    O'Sullivan, K.
    Synnott, A.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2018, 77 : 1860 - 1861
  • [8] Barriers to medication adherence in a rural-urban dual economy: a multi-stakeholder qualitative study
    Jacqueline Xu
    Mengxi Zhao
    Athina Vrosgou
    Natalie Chin Wen Yu
    Chelsea Liu
    Han Zhang
    Chunxi Ding
    Noelle Wyman Roth
    Yuesong Pan
    Liping Liu
    Yilong Wang
    Yongjun Wang
    Janet Prvu Bettger
    BMC Health Services Research, 21
  • [9] Barriers to medication adherence in a rural-urban dual economy: a multi-stakeholder qualitative study
    Xu, Jacqueline
    Zhao, Mengxi
    Vrosgou, Athina
    Yu, Natalie Chin Wen
    Liu, Chelsea
    Zhang, Han
    Ding, Chunxi
    Roth, Noelle Wyman
    Pan, Yuesong
    Liu, Liping
    Wang, Yilong
    Wang, Yongjun
    Bettger, Janet Prvu
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [10] An Integrated and Multi-Stakeholder Approach for Sustainable Phosphorus Management in Agriculture
    Colombo, Federico
    Pesenti, Michele
    Araniti, Fabrizio
    Pilu, Salvatore Roberto
    Nocito, Fabio Francesco
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (04):