Performance of node reporting and data system (node-RADS): a preliminary study in cervical cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Wu, Qingxia [1 ]
Lou, Jianghua [1 ]
Liu, Jinjin [1 ]
Dong, Linxiao [1 ]
Wu, Qingxia [1 ]
Wu, Yaping [1 ]
Yu, Xuan [1 ]
Wang, Meiyun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ, Peoples Hosp Zhengzhou Univ, Henan Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Med Imaging,Peoples Hosp, 7 Weiwu Rd, Zhengzhou 450003, Henan, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Acad Sci, Biomed Res Inst, Lab Brain Sci & Brain Like Intelligence Technol, 266-38 Mingli Rd, Zhengzhou 450046, Henan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Cervical cancer; Lymph node; MRI; Metastasis; PELVIC LYMPH-NODES; RADIOMICS;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-024-01205-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) was proposed and can be applied to lymph nodes (LNs) across all anatomical sites. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of Node-RADS in cervical cancer patients. Methods A total of 81 cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy and LN dissection were retrospectively enrolled. Node-RADS evaluations were performed by two radiologists on preoperative MRI scans for all patients, both at the LN level and patient level. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were employed to evaluate the distribution differences in size and configuration between patients with and without LN metastasis (LNM) in various regions. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to explore the diagnostic performance of the Node-RADS score for LNM. Results The rates of LNM in the para-aortic, common iliac, internal iliac, external iliac, and inguinal regions were 7.4%, 9.3%, 19.8%, 21.0%, and 2.5%, respectively. At the patient level, as the NODE-RADS score increased, the rate of LNM also increased, with rates of 26.1%, 29.2%, 42.9%, 80.0%, and 90.9% for Node-RADS scores 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. At the patient level, the AUCs for Node-RADS scores > 1, >2, > 3, and > 4 were 0.632, 0.752, 0.763, and 0.726, respectively. Both at the patient level and LN level, a Node-RADS score > 3 could be considered the optimal cut-off value with the best AUC and accuracy. Conclusions Node-RADS is effective in predicting LNM for scores 4 to 5. However, the proportions of LNM were more than 25% at the patient level for scores 1 and 2, which does not align with the expected very low and low probability of LNM for these scores.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of node reporting and data system (node-RADS): a preliminary study in cervical cancer
    Qingxia Wu
    Jianghua Lou
    Jinjin Liu
    Linxiao Dong
    Qingxia Wu
    Yaping Wu
    Xuan Yu
    Meiyun Wang
    BMC Medical Imaging, 24
  • [2] Diagnostic performance of Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) for regional lymph node staging of gastric cancer by CT
    Loch, Florian N.
    Beyer, Katharina
    Kreis, Martin E.
    Kamphues, Carsten
    Rayya, Wael
    Schineis, Christian
    Jahn, Janosch
    Tronser, Moritz
    Elsholtz, Fabian H. J.
    Hamm, Bernd
    Reiter, Rolf
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (05) : 3183 - 3193
  • [3] Diagnostic performance of Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) for assessing mesorectal lymph node in rectal cancer by CT
    Niu, Yue
    Wen, Lu
    Yang, Yanhui
    Zhang, Yi
    Fu, Yi
    Lu, Qiang
    Wang, Yu
    Yu, Xiao
    Yu, Xiaoping
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [4] Introducing the Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS): a concept for standardized assessment of lymph nodes in cancer
    Fabian H. J. Elsholtz
    Patrick Asbach
    Matthias Haas
    Minerva Becker
    Regina G. H. Beets-Tan
    Harriet C. Thoeny
    Anwar R. Padhani
    Bernd Hamm
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 6116 - 6124
  • [5] Introducing the Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS): a concept for standardized assessment of lymph nodes in cancer
    Elsholtz, Fabian H. J.
    Asbach, Patrick
    Haas, Matthias
    Becker, Minerva
    Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Hamm, Bernd
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (08) : 6116 - 6124
  • [6] Correction to: Introducing the Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS): a concept for standardized assessment of lymph nodes in cancer
    Fabian H. J. Elsholtz
    Patrick Asbach
    Matthias Haas
    Minerva Becker
    Regina G. H. Beets-Tan
    Harriet C. Thoeny
    Anwar R. Padhani
    Bernd Hamm
    European Radiology, 2021, 31 : 7217 - 7217
  • [7] The performance of the node reporting and data system 1.0 (Node-RADS) and DWI-MRI in staging patients with cervical carcinoma according to the new FIGO classification (2018)
    Ninkova, Roberta Valerieva
    Calabrese, Alessandro
    Curti, Federica
    Riccardi, Sandrine
    Gennarini, Marco
    Miceli, Valentina
    Cupertino, Angelica
    Di Donato, Violante
    Pernazza, Angelina
    Rizzo, Stefania Maria
    Panebianco, Valeria
    Catalano, Carlo
    Manganaro, Lucia
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2024, 129 (07): : 1062 - 1075
  • [8] Node Reporting and Data System 1.0 (Node-RADS) for the Assessment of Oncological Patients' Lymph Nodes in Clinical Imaging
    Parillo, Marco
    Quattrocchi, Carlo Cosimo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (01)
  • [9] Diagnostic performance of Node-RADS score for mesorectal lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer
    Niu, Yue
    Yu, Sanqiang
    Chen, Peng
    Tang, Mengjie
    Wen, Lu
    Sun, Yan
    Yang, Yanhui
    Zhang, Yi
    Fu, Yi
    Lu, Qiang
    Luo, Tao
    Yu, Xiaoping
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2025, 50 (01) : 38 - 48
  • [10] Diagnostic performance of node-RADS classification for primary lymph node assessment in rectal cancer: a modality benchmarking study
    Li Jiang
    Zijian Zhuang
    Xi Tang
    Fugang Zhang
    Haitao Zhu
    Xuewen Xu
    Dongqing Wang
    Lirong Zhang
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 151 (4)