Flipped Classroom Case Learning vs Traditional Lecture-Based Learning in Medical School Ophthalmology Education: A Randomized Trial

被引:7
|
作者
Chan, Poemen P. [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Vivian W. Y. [2 ]
Yam, Jason C. S. [1 ]
Brelen, Marten E. [1 ]
Chu, Wai Kit [1 ]
Wan, Kelvin H. [1 ]
Chen, Li J. [1 ]
Tham, Clement C. [1 ]
Pang, Chi P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Ctr Learning Enhancement & Res, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Kowloon, 4-F Hong Kong Eye Hosp,147K Argyle St, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
IMPLEMENTATION; PERCEPTIONS; STUDENTS; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000005238
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose To address the problem of teaching noncore specialties, for which there is often limited teaching time and low student engagement, a flipped classroom case learning (FCCL) module was designed and implemented in a compulsory 5-day ophthalmology rotation for undergraduate medical students. The module consisted of a flipped classroom, online gamified clinical cases, and case-based learning. Method Final-year medical students in a 5-day ophthalmology rotation were randomized to the FCCL or a traditional lecture-based (TLB) module. The outcomes of subjective assessments (student-rated anonymous Likert scale questionnaire, scale 1 to 5, and course and teaching evaluation, scale 1 to 6) and objective assessments (end-of-rotation and post-MBChB multiple-choice questions, scale 0 to 60) were compared between the 2 groups. Results Between May 2021 and June 2022, 216 students (108 in each group) completed the study. Compared with the TLB students, the students in the FCCL group rated various aspects of the course statistically significantly higher, including feeling more enthusiastic and engaged by the course and more encouraged to ask questions and participate in discussions (all P <.001). They also gave higher ratings for the instructional methods, course assignments, course outcomes, and course workload (P <.001). They gave higher course and teaching evaluation scores to the tutors (5.7 +/- 0.6 vs 5.0 +/- 1.0, P <.001). The FCCL group scored higher than the TLB group on the end-of- rotation multiple-choice questions ( 53.6 +/- 3.1 vs 51.8 +/- 2.8, P <.001). When 32 FCCL students and 36 TLB students were reassessed approximately 20 weeks after the rotation, the FCCL group scored higher (40.3 +/- 9.1) than the TLB group (34.3 +/- 10.9, P =.018). Conclusions Applying the FCCL module in ophthalmology teaching enhanced medical students' satisfaction, examination performance, and knowledge retention. A similar model may be suitable for other specialties.
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1061
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Video-based learning versus traditional lecture-based learning for osteoporosis education: a randomized controlled trial
    Chotiyarnwong, Pojchong
    Boonnasa, Wararat
    Chotiyarnwong, Chayaporn
    Unnanuntana, Aasis
    [J]. AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2021, 33 (01) : 125 - 131
  • [2] Comparison between flipped classroom and lecture-based classroom in ophthalmology clerkship
    Tang, Fen
    Chen, Chuan
    Zhu, Yi
    Zuo, Chengguo
    Zhong, Yimin
    Wang, Nan
    Zhou, Lijun
    Zou, Yuxian
    Liang, Dan
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2017, 22
  • [3] Video-based learning versus traditional lecture-based learning for osteoporosis education: a randomized controlled trial
    Pojchong Chotiyarnwong
    Wararat Boonnasa
    Chayaporn Chotiyarnwong
    Aasis Unnanuntana
    [J]. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2021, 33 : 125 - 131
  • [4] Student Perceptions of Team-based Learning vs Traditional Lecture-based Learning
    Frame, Tracy R.
    Cailor, Stephanie M.
    Gryka, Rebecca J.
    Chen, Aleda M.
    Kiersma, Mary E.
    Sheppard, Lorin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2015, 79 (04)
  • [5] Comparative Analysis of Effectiveness Between Flipped Classroom and Lecture-Based Classroom in Undergraduate Medical Education at Alfaisal University
    Sajid, Muhammad
    Shaikh, Abdul Ahad
    Ikram, Muhammad Faisal
    Cahusac, Peter
    Yaqinuddin, Ahmed
    AlKattan, Wael
    Rohra, Dileep
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (11)
  • [6] Problem-based learning versus lecture-based learning in postgraduate medical education
    Smits, PB
    de Buisonjé, CD
    Verbeek, JH
    van Dijk, FJ
    Metz, JC
    ten Cate, OJ
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2003, 29 (04) : 280 - 287
  • [7] Integrating a flipped classroom and problem-based learning into ophthalmology education
    Jingyi Luo
    Tao Lin
    Nan Wang
    Yuxian Zou
    Xing Liu
    Chengguo Zuo
    Yimin Zhong
    [J]. 眼科学报, 2017, 32 (01) : 25 - 32
  • [8] Comparison between flipped classroom and lecture-based classroom in ophthalmology clerkship (vol 22, 1395679, 2017)
    Tang, F.
    Chen, C.
    Zhu, Y.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION ONLINE, 2017, 22
  • [9] A comparison of team-based learning and lecture-based learning on clinical reasoning and classroom engagement: a cluster randomized controlled trial
    Ulfa, Yunefit
    Igarashi, Yukari
    Takahata, Kaori
    Shishido, Eri
    Horiuchi, Shigeko
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [10] Comparison of Lecture-Based Learning vs Discussion-Based Learning in Undergraduate Medical Students
    Zhao, Beiqun
    Potter, Donald D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2016, 73 (02) : 250 - 257