Climate change and government policy: Fresh insights from complexity theory

被引:12
|
作者
Carmona, Pedro [1 ]
Stef, Nicolae [2 ]
Ben Jabeur, Sami [3 ]
Ben Zaied, Younes [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Valencia, Dept Accounting, Ave Tarongers S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
[2] Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, Burgundy Sch Business, Dept Accounting Finance & Law, CEREN EA 7477, Dijon, France
[3] UCLY, Inst Sustainable Business & Org, Sci & Humanities Confluence Res Ctr, ESDES, Lyon, France
[4] EDC Paris Business Sch, OCRE, Paris, France
关键词
Climate change; Government policy; Complexity theory; REGRESSION-ANALYSIS; FSQCA; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117831
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Governments worldwide are increasingly concerned about ensuring a balance between economic and environ-mental well being. Global economies, particularly developing ones, emphasize the importance of achieving escofriendly growth to maintain the levels of the ecological footprint while achieving higher economic growth. The ecological footprint is a comprehensive indicator of environmental degradation. It is used to assess the state of the environment because it reflects the impact of all human activities on nature. This study contributes to the literature by offering a novel analytical approach for solving complex interactions of ecological footprint ante-cedents, advancing the theoretical reasoning behind how government policy combines to explain the ecological footprint from some G7 countries (France, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, and Germany) from 1996 to 2020. To establish a composite score of environmental footprint, we used complexity theory as well as fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) and necessary condition analysis (NCA). Our analysis revealed that low expen-ditures on environmental protection and waste management, low taxes on transport, and high energy use are sufficient conditions to be included in the causal configurations for a high ecological footprint. Additionally, the sufficient solution, which has the highest coverage score that produces a low ecological footprint relies on high expenditure on environmental protection and high taxes on transportation. In this framework, Japan, Italy, and France have more effective government policies in terms of reducing the ecological footprint.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Role of Financial Development in Climate Change Mitigation: Fresh Policy Insights from South Africa
    Maxwell Chukwudi Udeagha
    Marthinus Christoffel Breitenbach
    Biophysical Economics and Sustainability, 2023, 8 (1)
  • [2] Government climate policy change
    Keates, Steven
    Harris, Dan
    WEATHER, 2023, 78 (11) : 303 - 303
  • [3] Frame divergence in climate change adaptation policy: insights from Australian local government planning
    Fuenfgeld, Hartmut
    McEvoy, Darryn
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY, 2014, 32 (04): : 603 - 622
  • [4] Studies call for climate change policy from government
    Dittrick, Paula
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2008, 106 (20) : 30 - 31
  • [5] Climate change, complexity, and policy design
    Braunerhjelm, Pontus
    Hepburn, Cameron
    OXFORD REVIEW OF ECONOMIC POLICY, 2023, 39 (04) : 667 - 679
  • [6] The Policy and Regulatory Engagement with Corruption: Insights from Complexity Theory
    Minto, Andrea
    Trincanato, Edoardo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION, 2022, 13 (01) : 21 - 44
  • [7] Sustainability and climate change: From theory to pragmatic policy
    Bretschger, Lucas
    Smulders, Sjak
    EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 69 : 1 - 3
  • [8] Unveiling asymmetry impacts of economic policy uncertainty on climate change: fresh insights into African Countries
    Brini R.
    Toumi H.
    Chaouech O.
    Toumi S.
    Alfalih A.A.
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (23) : 34647 - 34660
  • [9] Making educational development and change sustainable: Insights from complexity theory
    Mason, Mark
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 29 (02) : 117 - 124
  • [10] Economic theory and climate change policy
    Peters, I
    Ackerman, F
    Bernow, S
    ENERGY POLICY, 1999, 27 (09) : 501 - 504