Pretreatment with a long-acting GnRH agonist for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: how to improve live birth?

被引:2
|
作者
Xu, Bin [1 ,2 ]
Hou, Zhaojuan [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Nenghui [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Li, Yanping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp, Reprod Med Ctr, 87 Xiangya Rd, Changsha 410008, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Clin Res Ctr Womans Reprod Hlth Hunan Prov, Changsha, Peoples R China
关键词
GnRH agonist; Follicular phase; Frozen-thawed embryo transfer; Hormone replacement treatment; Assisted reproductive technique; HORMONE AGONIST; ENDOMETRIAL PREPARATION; PITUITARY SUPPRESSION; ARTIFICIAL CYCLE; NATURAL CYCLE; GONADOTROPIN; REPLACEMENT; IMPLANTATION; INFERTILITY; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1186/s13048-023-01277-0
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Whether pretreatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) can improve the pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles is controversial. The inconsistencies in the results of different studies would be related to the characteristics of the included patients and the protocol of GnRHa use. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of pretreatment with a long-acting GnRH agonist in the early follicular phase of FET cycles and determined which population was suitable for the protocol. Results We retrospectively included 630 and 1141 patients in the GnRHa FET and hormone replacement treatment (HRT) FET without GnRHa groups respectively, between October 2017 and March 2019 at a university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center. On the second or third day of menstruation, 3.75 mg of leuprorelin was administered. After 14 days, HRT was initiated for endometrial preparation. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of patient characteristics. However, the GnRHa FET group showed a higher percentage of endometrium with a triple line pattern (94.8% vs 89.6%, p < 0.001) on the day of progesterone administration, with increased implantation (35.6% vs 29.8%, p = 0.005), clinical pregnancy (49.8% vs 43.3%, p = 0.008), and live birth rate (39.4% vs 33.7%, p = 0.016), than the HRT FET cycles with similar endometrial thickness, ectopic pregnancy and early miscarriage rates. Binary logistic regression analysis showed the GnRHa FET group to be associated with an increased chance of clinical pregnancy (P=0.028, odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.70) and live birth (P=0.013, odds ratio [OR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.70) compared to the HRT FET without GnRHa group. After subgroup analysis, we found that the GnRHa FET group showed a significantly higher live birth rate in the subgroups of age < 40 years, primary infertility, with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and irregular menstruation. Conclusions Pretreatment with a long-acting GnRHa during the early follicular phase improved the live birth rate in FET cycles. Age < 40 years, primary infertility, PCOS, and irregular menstruation are effective indications for endometrial preparation with GnRHa pretreatment in FET cycles. However, further randomized controlled trials are required to verify these results.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pretreatment with a long-acting GnRH agonist for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: how to improve live birth?
    Bin Xu
    Zhaojuan Hou
    Nenghui Liu
    Jing Zhao
    Yanping Li
    Journal of Ovarian Research, 16
  • [2] Pretreatment with a GnRH agonist and hormone replacement treatment protocol could not improve live birth rate for PCOS women undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles
    Xitong Liu
    Juanzi Shi
    Haiyan Bai
    Wen Wen
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [3] Pretreatment with a GnRH agonist and hormone replacement treatment protocol could not improve live birth rate for PCOS women undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles
    Liu, Xitong
    Shi, Juanzi
    Bai, Haiyan
    Wen, Wen
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [4] GnRH agonist trigger in GnRH antagonist protocol affects endometrial receptivity in fresh embryo transfer cycles but not in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles
    Yang, X. H.
    Chen, S. L.
    Chen, X.
    Ye, D. S.
    Zheng, H. Y.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27
  • [5] Administration of a GnRH agonist during the luteal phase frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a meta-analysis
    Li, Shuyi
    Li, Yanping
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 34 (11) : 920 - 924
  • [6] Frozen-thawed cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles after previous GnRH agonist or antagonist stimulation
    Bahceci, Mustafa
    Ulug, Ulun
    Erden, Halit Firat
    Tosun, Suleyman
    Ciray, Nadir
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2009, 18 (01) : 67 - 72
  • [7] Endometrial compaction is associated with the increased live birth rate in artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles
    Yaprak, Esra
    Sukur, Yavuz Emre
    Ozmen, Batuhan
    Sonmezer, Murat
    Berker, Bulent
    Atabekoglu, Cem
    Aytac, Rusen
    HUMAN FERTILITY, 2023, 26 (03) : 550 - 556
  • [8] Endometrial Preparation for Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer With or Without Pretreatment With GnRH Agonist: A Randomized Controlled Trial at Two Centers
    Xu, Jian
    Li, Shu-Zhen
    Yin, Min-Na
    Liang, Pei-Ling
    Li, Ping
    Sun, Ling
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [9] Effects of single dose GnRH agonist as luteal support on pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: an RCT
    Davar, Robab
    Mojtahedi, Maryam Farid
    Miraj, Sepideh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE, 2015, 13 (08) : 483 - 488
  • [10] Oral dydrogesterone in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles
    Gomes Mattos de Macedo, Luma Caroline
    Cavagna Neto, Mario
    Dzik, Artur
    Rocha, Andressa do Rosario
    Rosa Lima, Sonia Maria Rolim
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2022, 68 (01): : 100 - 105