Relationship between the inferiority and superiority complex and the Big Five and Dark Triad traits

被引:4
|
作者
Cekrlija, Dorde [1 ]
Rokvic, Nikola Milos [2 ]
Dinic, Bojana M. [3 ]
Schermer, Julie Aitken [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Banja Luka, Fac Philosophy, Dept Psychol, Banja Luka, Bosnia & Herceg
[2] Dr Lazar Vrkat Fac Law & Business Study, Novi Sad, Serbia
[3] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Philosophy, Dept Psychol, Novi Sad, Serbia
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Management & Org Studies, London, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Western Ontario, Psychol Dept, London, ON, Canada
关键词
Inferiority complex; Superiority complex; Big five model; Dark triad; Hierarchical multiple regression analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2023.112123
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research aimed in exploring inferiority and superiority complexes' relationship with dark personality traits. In order to provide a more comprehensive overview personality measures from the Big Five model were included in the study as well. Sample with 1046 respondents completed online versions of the short Inferiority and Superiority Complex scales, Dark Triad Dirty Dozen and BFI-10. Data were analyzed using hierarchical multiple regression. It was found that personality measures from the BFI-10 explain more variance in inferiority and superiority complexes than dark personality traits. Both inferiority and superiority complexes were found associated with Narcissism suggesting a person's focus on own self, psychopathy was positively related only with superiority, while Machiavellianism was not related to any complex. In general, the contribution of the dark traits in explaining inferiority and superiority complex is relatively weak. Obtained relations with personality measure from the BFI were expected; neuroticism showed the greatest predictive power for inferiority and, cconscientiousness and extraversion for superiority complex. Obtained results just partly confirmed presumptions on the role of dark traits on the inferiority and superiority complexes. In the following studies longer versions of the personality traits scales should be used in order to provide more robust findings.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Relationship between Personality Traits and Aggressive Driving: The Big Five and the Dark Triad
    Hidalgo-Fuentes, Sergio
    ACTA COLOMBIANA DE PSICOLOGIA, 2023, 26 (01): : 188 - 199
  • [2] Personality and the perception of situations: The Big Five and Dark Triad traits
    Jonason, Peter K.
    Sherman, Ryne A.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2020, 163
  • [3] All the Dark Triad and some of the Big Five traits are visible in the face
    Alper, Sinan
    Bayrak, Fatih
    Yilmaz, Onurcan
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2021, 168
  • [4] The Big Five and dark triad personality traits as predictors of emotional labour
    Ozsoy, Emrah
    Griffiths, Mark D.
    Sahinoglu, Zeynep Ak
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 76 (01)
  • [5] The relationship between risk, the dark triad traits, and empathy
    Kornilova, T.
    Pavlova, E.
    Krasavtseva, Y.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 64 : S440 - S441
  • [6] Big Five and Dark Triad personality traits as predictors of multicultural attitude and efficacy
    Kayis, Ahmet Rifat
    Akcaoglu, Mustafa Ozturk
    CURRENT ISSUES IN PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 9 (03) : 215 - 228
  • [8] The relationship between insomnia symptoms and the dark triad personality traits
    Akram, Umair
    Allen, Sarah
    McCarty, Kristofor
    Gardani, Maria
    Tan, Alice
    Villarreal, Daniel
    Bilsborough, Emily
    Dooher, Grace
    Gibbs, Grace
    Hudson, Jess L.
    Mills, Rachel
    Subramaniam, Viknesh
    Akram, Asha
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 131 : 212 - 215
  • [9] Dark Triad traits and relationship dissolution
    Brewer, Gayle
    Parkinson, Madison
    Pickles, Alice
    Anson, Joshua
    Mulinder, Georgia
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2023, 204
  • [10] The Dark Triad, the Big Five, and the HEXACO model
    Lee, Kibeom
    Ashton, Michael C.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2014, 67 : 2 - 5