Uncertainty and Triple Access Planning in European Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: a long way to go yet?

被引:3
|
作者
Rye, Tom [1 ]
Lyons, Glenn [2 ]
Svensson, Tony [3 ]
Lenferink, Sander [4 ]
Mladenovic, Luka [5 ,7 ]
Piras, Francesco [6 ]
Witzell, Jacob [3 ]
机构
[1] Urban Planning Inst Republ Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Univ West England, Fac Environm & Technol, Ctr Transport & Soc, Bristol, England
[3] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Div Urban & Reg Studies, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Management Res, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Urban Planning Inst Republ Slovenia, Dept Mobil, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[6] Univ Cagliari, Dept Civil Environm Engn & Architecture, Cagliari, Italy
[7] Urban Planning Inst Republ Slovenia, Trnovski Pristan 2, Ljubljana SI-1000, Slovenia
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
SUMP; mobility planning; transport planning; digital accessibility; decarbonisation; GOVERNANCE; STRATEGY; FACE;
D O I
10.1080/03081060.2024.2311804
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Triple Access Planning (TAP) is the idea that accessibility can be delivered through physical mobility, digital connectivity, and spatial proximity. There is great uncertainty as to how far one of these three elements will substitute for or complement the others in delivering the accessibility we need in future. Sustainable Urban Mobility (SUM) Planning is touted as a relatively new paradigm in local transport planning oriented to the achievement of a wide range of societal objectives. The paper presents a review of how well SUM Plans from eight European countries, and national guidelines from four currently account for TAP and uncertainty in their approach. Our findings suggest that while the concept of physical proximity is well-understood, other aspects of the TAP and uncertainty approach are not. Digital connectivity is largely ignored. The planning future is treated as largely certain, with no consideration of disruptive factors that might alter this future.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Uncertainty and Triple Access Planning in European Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans: a long way to go yet? (FEB, 10.1080/03081060.2024.2311804, 2024)
    Rye, Tom
    Lyons, Glenn
    Svensson, Tony
    Lenferink, Sander
    Mladenovic, Luka
    Piras, Francesco
    Witzell, Jacob
    TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 47 (04) : 622 - 622
  • [2] Health in mobility planning: An assessment of how health is considered in Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans
    Kasraian, Dena
    Murdock, Hannah E.
    Imani, Ahmadreza Faghih
    Yu, Yurong
    de Nazelle, Audrey
    Stead, Dominic
    Kahlmeier, Sonja
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT & HEALTH, 2024, 39
  • [3] Analysis of urban development plans using the sustainable urban accessibility paradigm and mobility planning
    Cavalcante, Camila Bandeira
    Lopes, Andre Soares
    Capasso, Marcelo Mota
    Grangeiro Loureiro, Carlos Felipe
    URBE-REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GESTAO URBANA, 2020, 12
  • [4] Prioritising health in mobility planning: unlocking the health protential of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMPs)
    Kahlmeier, Sonja
    Kasraina, Dena
    Murdock, Hannah E.
    Imani, Ahmadreza Faghih
    Yu, Yurong
    de Nazelle, Audrey
    Stead, Dominic
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 34
  • [5] Land use models and sustainable urban mobility plans: An integrative approach for strategic planning
    Pozoukidou G.
    Gavanas N.
    Verani E.
    1600, WITPress (12): : 867 - 882
  • [6] Urban planning historical review of master plans and the way towards a sustainable city:Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
    Linda Lazaro Peter
    Yuzhen Yang
    Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2019, 8 (03) : 359 - 377
  • [7] Urban planning historical review of master plans and the way towards a sustainable city: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
    Peter, Linda Lazaro
    Yang, Yuzhen
    FRONTIERS OF ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (03) : 359 - 377