A comparison of web-browser perimetry Melbourne Rapid Fields to Humphrey Field Analyzer in rural Australia

被引：0
|
作者：
Lin, Sarah [1 ]
Trang, Edward
Bank, Allan [2 ]
Kong, George Y. X. [3 ]
Agar, Ashish [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
[2] Prince Wales Hosp, Sydney, Australia
[3] Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hosp, Glaucoma Unit, Melbourne, Australia
来源：
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2023年 / 51卷 / 09期
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号：
100212 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：949 / 950
页数：2
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Home monitoring of glaucoma with a device-independent web-browser version of the Melbourne Rapid Fields (MRF-web) perimetry software
    Vingrys, Algis J.
    Prea, Selwyn M.
    Tiang, Joyce
    Kong, George Y. X.
    Vingrys, Algis J.
    Prea, Selwyn M.
    Tiang, Joyce
    Kong, George Y. X.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2024, 65 (07)
  • [2] Multi-centre comparison between device-independent web-browser perimetry (Melbourne Rapid Fields-web) and SITA-Faster for glaucoma
    Tiang, Joyce
    Vingrys, Algis J.
    Lin, Sarah
    Prea, Selwyn M.
    Moktar, Adam Ahmed
    Bank, Allan
    Agar, Ashish
    Kong, Yu Xiang George
    FRONTIERS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 5
  • [3] Comparison of portable perimetry tests with the Humphrey Field Analyzer
    Lin, Michael
    Zhao, Yan
    Freeman, Sandra
    Kang, Joyce
    De Arrigunaga, Sofia
    Friedman, David S.
    Liebman, Daniel Lee
    Roldan, Ana M.
    Chang, Dolly
    Elze, Tobias
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [4] Comparison of Perimetric Outcomes from Melbourne Rapid Fields Tablet Perimeter Software and Humphrey Field Analyzer in Glaucoma Patients
    Kumar, Harsh
    Thulasidas, Mithun
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 2020
  • [5] Comparison between New Perimetry Device (IMOvifa ®) and Humphrey Field Analyzer
    Eslani, Medi
    Nishida, Takashi
    Moghimi, Sasan
    Arias, Juan M.
    Vasile, Cristiana
    Mohammadzadeh, Vahid
    Weinreb, Robert N.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2022, 63 (07)
  • [6] Comparison between Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer: Performance and usability of the Fundus Automated Perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer in healthy, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous patients
    Morbio, Roberta
    Longo, Chiara
    De Vitto, Antonia Maria Luce
    Comacchio, Francesco
    Della Porta, Lucia Barbara
    Marchini, Giorgio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 31 (04) : 1850 - 1856
  • [7] A Comparison of Standard Automated Perimetry on the Heidelberg Edge Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer
    Goren, A.
    Ho, Y. -H.
    Schuelein, E.
    Flanagan, J. G.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2010, 51 (13)
  • [8] Comparison of Humphrey Matrix 24-2 standard perimetry and Humphrey Field Analyzer 24-2 SITA standard perimetry
    Bartlett, JD
    Shaikh, A
    Semes, L
    Xie, A
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2005, 46
  • [9] Comparison of the threshold value of SITA with that of conventional perimetry by Humphrey field analyzer in glaucoma patients.
    Iwase, A
    Kitazawa, Y
    Ohno, Y
    Ansari, I
    Chauhan, B
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S89 - S89
  • [10] MULTICENTER LONGITUDINAL COMPARISON OF PERIMETRY RESULTS BETWEEN IPAD PERIMETER AND HUMPHREY FIELD ANALYZER FOR GLAUCOMA
    Kong, Yu Xiang George
    Prea, Selwyn Marc
    Mehta, Aditi
    He, Mingguang
    Crowston, Jonathan
    Gupta, Viney
    Martin, Keith
    Vingrys, Algis
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 45 : 23 - 23
12