Treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization and outcomes for early stage triple-negative breast cancer in Japan

Aim: There is limited information regarding the treatment and outcomes of early stage triple-negative breast cancer (esTNBC) in real-world settings in Japan. Materials & methods: Retrospective analyses of the Medical Data Vision database assessed treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), patient characteristics, outcomes and prognostic factors among four groups (neoadjuvant therapy+surgery+adjuvant therapy; neoadjuvant therapy+surgery; surgery+adjuvant therapy; surgery only) of esTNBC patients. Results: Treatment patterns, HCRU, and demographics varied among the four groups. HCRU was greater and prognosis tended to be worse in the neoadjuvant+surgery+adjuvant therapy group. Conclusion: Our results provide insights into the treatment practices, HCRU and prognosis of esTNBC in Japan. The treatment practices were heterogeneous, reflecting the decision-making process in Japan during the study period. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a cancer type that does not express three biomarkers (estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), which results in a lack of targeted treatment strategies. Early stage TNBC (esTNBC) is mainly treated by anticancer drugs before (neoadjuvant) and/or after (adjuvant) surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. New therapies including an immune checkpoint inhibitor which helps better immune system and a PARP inhibitor which helps repair DNA damage were approved for esTNBC in 2022 in Japan, and they are expected to change the treatment options for TNBC. However, there are limited data about the treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and outcomes for esTNBC in real-world clinical practice in Japan. Therefore, a hospital-based administrative database was analyzed to understand the treatment patterns for patients with esTNBC in Japan, the HCRU, treatment outcomes (overall survival and event free survival), and the associated factors. Patients received a large variety of treatments before and after surgery. Patients who received both neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies tended to have more severe disease and required greater HCRU, and their outcomes were worse than patients who received neoadjuvant treatment only, adjuvant treatment only or neither neoadjuvant nor adjuvant treatment. Our findings will help us understand how new treatments will impact the treatment practices and patient outcomes in the future. We investigated the treatment sequences, healthcare resource utilization and outcomes to provide insight into the management of triple-negative breast cancer in real-world settings in Japan.#breastcancer#realworld