ToxNet: an artificial intelligence designed for decision support for toxin prediction

被引:1
|
作者
Zellner, Tobias [1 ]
Romanek, Katrin [1 ]
Rabe, Christian [1 ]
Schmoll, Sabrina [1 ]
Geith, Stefanie [1 ]
Heier, Eva-Carina [1 ]
Stich, Raphael [1 ]
Burwinkel, Hendrik [2 ]
Keicher, Matthias [2 ]
Bani-Harouni, David [2 ]
Navab, Nassir [2 ]
Ahmadi, Seyed-Ahmad [3 ]
Eyer, Florian [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Poison Control Ctr Munich, TUM Sch Med, Div Clin Toxicol,Dept Internal Med 2, Munich, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Munich, TUM Dept Informat, Comp Aided Med Procedures, Garching, Germany
[3] NVIDIA GmbH, Munich, Germany
关键词
Toxin prediction; artificial intelligence; graph convolutional networks; representation learning; disease classification; EXPERT-SYSTEM; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/15563650.2022.2144345
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Background Artificial intelligences (AIs) are emerging in the field of medical informatics in many areas. They are mostly used for diagnosis support in medical imaging but have potential uses in many other fields of medicine where large datasets are available. Aim To develop an artificial intelligence (AI) "ToxNet", a machine-learning based computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system, which aims to predict poisons based on patient's symptoms and metadata from our Poison Control Center (PCC) data. To prove its accuracy and compare it against medical doctors (MDs). Methods The CADx system was developed and trained using data from 781,278 calls recorded in our PCC database from 2001 to 2019. All cases were mono-intoxications. Patient symptoms and meta-information (e.g., age group, sex, etiology, toxin point of entry, weekday, etc.) were provided. In the pilot phase, the AI was trained on 10 substances, the AI's prediction was compared to naive matching, literature matching, a multi-layer perceptron (MLP), and the graph attention network (GAT). The trained AI's accuracy was then compared to 10 medical doctors in an individual and in an identical dataset. The dataset was then expanded to 28 substances and the predictions and comparisons repeated. Results In the pilot, the prediction performance in a set of 8995 patients with 10 substances was 0.66 +/- 0.01 (F1 micro score). Our CADx system was significantly superior to naive matching, literature matching, MLP, and GAT (p < 0.005). It outperformed our physicians experienced in clinical toxicology in the individual and identical dataset. In the extended dataset, our CADx system was able to predict the correct toxin in a set of 36,033 patients with 28 substances with an overall performance of 0.27 +/- 0.01 (F1 micro score), also significantly superior to naive matching, literature matching, MLP, and GAT. It also outperformed our MDs. Conclusion Our AI trained on a large PCC database works well for poison prediction in these experiments. With further research, it might become a valuable aid for physicians in predicting unknown substances and might be the first step into AI use in PCCs.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 63
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision support for toxin prediction using artificial intelligence
    Zellner, Tobias
    Burwinkel, Hendrik
    Keicher, Matthias
    Bani-Harouni, David
    Navab, Nassir
    Ahmadi, Seyed-Ahmad
    Eyer, Florian
    [J]. CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2021, 59 (06) : 541 - 541
  • [2] Artificial intelligence in clinical decision support and outcome prediction - applications in stroke
    Yeo, Melissa
    Kok, Hong Kuan
    Kutaiba, Numan
    Maingard, Julian
    Thijs, Vincent
    Tahayori, Bahman
    Russell, Jeremy
    Jhamb, Ashu
    Chandra, Ronil V.
    Brooks, Mark
    Barras, Christen D.
    Asadi, Hamed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, : 518 - 528
  • [3] Clinical Decision Support by Artificial Intelligence
    Zwack, Laura
    Weber, Yvonne
    Sippel, Christoph
    Guenyak, Goekhan
    [J]. INTERNIST, 2019, 60 : S9 - S9
  • [4] Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support
    Zubair, Raheel
    Francisco, Gina
    Rao, Babar
    [J]. CUTIS, 2018, 102 (03): : 210 - 211
  • [5] Perspectives on decision support and artificial intelligence
    Salo, A.
    Haemaelainen, R.P.
    [J]. Proceedings of the IASTED International Symposium on Applied Informatics, 1991,
  • [6] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS
    Wilson, L.
    Jacobs, P.
    Espinoza, A.
    Dodier, R.
    Young, G.
    Branigan, D.
    Eom, J.
    Chen, D.
    Mosquera-Lopez, C.
    El Youssef, J.
    Pinsonault, J.
    Leitschuh, J.
    Castle, J.
    [J]. DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2023, 25 : A3 - A3
  • [7] DECISION SUPPORT IN ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE ENVIRONMENT
    SALO, A
    HAMALAINEN, RP
    [J]. LECTURE NOTES IN ECONOMICS AND MATHEMATICAL SYSTEMS, 1991, 356 : 183 - 190
  • [8] Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support in Sepsis
    Wu, Miao
    Du, Xianjin
    Gu, Raymond
    Wei, Jie
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [9] Artificial intelligence tools for decision support systems
    RosenthalSabroux, C
    Zarate, P
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1997, 103 (02) : 275 - 276
  • [10] Clinical Decision Support in the Era of Artificial Intelligence
    Shortliffe, Edward H.
    Sepulveda, Martin J.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 320 (21): : 2199 - 2200