Multi-criteria assessment framework for evaluation of Green Deal performance

被引:2
|
作者
Ozdemir, Salih [1 ]
Demirel, Neslihan [2 ]
Zarali, Fulya [2 ]
Celik, Tuncay [3 ]
机构
[1] Kayseri Univ, Grad Sch, Kayseri, Turkiye
[2] Kayseri Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Kayseri, Turkiye
[3] Kayseri Univ, Dept Int Trade & Logist, Kayseri, Turkiye
关键词
European Green Deal; Climate change; MCDM (multi-criteria decision making); Performance evaluation; MEREC; MAIRCA; MCDM METHODS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-31370-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Green Deal (EGD) is a long-term and important policy to combat climate change. It contains comprehensive regulations that concern the European continent beyond individuals, companies, and cities. Moreover, achieving environmental sustainability depends on the whole world taking responsibility and concrete steps quickly. Although successful and rapid change requires collective effort and high performance across all topics, involving all countries, communities, and sectors, leaving no one behind, since the economic conditions and infrastructures of countries are different, the process of adaptation to green transformation varies. In this study, the multi-criteria decision-making approach has been used to evaluate the performance of the EU member states in terms of many different criteria under the protecting, reducing, and enabling dimensions in an integrated and comprehensive manner. In this context, the data of the EU member states obtained from Eurostat on 3 main and 15 sub-criteria were used, criterion weights were determined by the MEREC method, and then the EGD performances of the countries were revealed by the MAIRCA method. According to the results, "the primary energy consumption" and "freight transport by mode" were selected as the most significant criteria in terms of EGD compliance performance. As a result of the evaluation of the performances of the alternatives, the Netherlands had the best EGD performance which was followed by Sweden while Ireland had the worst ranking and Cyprus was the other underperforming member. Comparative analyses were conducted with the aim of testing the consistency of the proposed methodology.
引用
收藏
页码:4686 / 4704
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-criteria assessment framework for evaluation of Green Deal performance
    Salih Ozdemir
    Neslihan Demirel
    Fulya Zaralı
    Tuncay Çelik
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 4686 - 4704
  • [2] Multi-criteria Performance Evaluation Framework for Rehabilitation Service Operations
    Vaidya, Omkarprasad S.
    Kumar, Sushil
    [J]. GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2021, 22 (06) : 1490 - 1506
  • [3] Multi-criteria evaluation of transport alternatives to deal with sprawl
    Massimo, Domenico Enrico
    Barbalace, Antonino
    Massimo, Antonio Pietro Paolo
    Cefala, Riccardo Maria
    [J]. AESTIMUM, 2011, : 65 - 84
  • [4] Green and regional? A multi-criteria assessment framework for the provision of green electricity for electric vehicles in Germany
    Fabianek, Paul
    Will, Christian
    Wolff, Stefanie
    Madlener, Reinhard
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 87
  • [5] A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Framework for Fish Farms
    Radulescu, Constanta Zoie
    Rahoveanu, Magdalena Turek
    [J]. STUDIES IN INFORMATICS AND CONTROL, 2011, 20 (02): : 181 - 186
  • [6] Application Framework of Multi-Criteria Methods in Sustainability Assessment
    Ziemba, Pawel
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (23)
  • [7] A MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION OF GREEN SPACES IN EUROPEAN CITIES
    Baycan-Levent, Tuezin
    Vreeker, Ron
    Nijkamp, Peter
    [J]. EUROPEAN URBAN AND REGIONAL STUDIES, 2009, 16 (02) : 193 - 213
  • [8] Shading Performance of Public Open Spaces: A Multi-Criteria Evaluation Framework for Housing Projects
    Asfour, Omar S.
    Mohsen, Osama
    Al-Qawasmi, Jamal
    [J]. BUILDINGS, 2023, 13 (12)
  • [9] Multi-Criteria Ranking: Next Generation of Multi-Criteria Recommendation Framework
    Zheng, Yong
    Wang, David
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 90715 - 90725
  • [10] A Multi-Criteria Decision Making Framework for Aircraft Dispatch Assessment
    Koornneef, Hemmo
    Verhagen, Wim J. C.
    Curran, Richard
    [J]. TRANSDISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING: A PARADIGM SHIFT, 2017, 5 : 11 - 20