Multi-objective optimal reservoir operation considering algal bloom control in reservoirs

被引:8
|
作者
Song, Yang [1 ,3 ]
Shen, Chunqi [2 ]
Wang, Ying [4 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Jiaotong Univ, Key Lab Hydraul & Waterway Engn, Minist Educ, Chongqing 400074, Peoples R China
[2] Suzhou Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Environm Engn & Sci, Suzhou 215009, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Michigan, Cooperat Inst Great Lakes Res, Sch Environm & Sustainabil, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Chengdu Univ, Coll Pharm, Chengdu 610106, Peoples R China
关键词
Algal bloom control; Reservoir ecological operation; Genetic optimization model; Physics lake model; Constrained multi-objective optimization; Outflow discharge; WATER-QUALITY; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; MODEL; LAKE; IMPACTS; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118436
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Reservoir operation strategies (ROSs) are considered an efficient and low-cost method to control algal blooms. However, reservoir operations must consider regular objectives, including flood prevention and power generation. To address this multi-objective optimization problem, we coupled the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) model and the General Lake Model-Aquatic EcoDynamics library (GLM-AED) model to optimize reservoir operations. Taking the Zipingpu Reservoir as a case study, we found the peak of outflow discharge (POD) could be reduced from 1059.5 to 861.4 m(3) s(-1) (19%), the total power generation (TPG) could be increased from 6.6 x 10(8) to 7.1 x 10(8) kW h (8%), and the peak of chlorophyll a concentration (PCC) could be decreased from 42.7 to 27.2 mu g L-1 (36%) compared with the original reservoir operation in the early flood period. The obtained Pareto frontier revealed the tradeoffs between algal bloom control, flood prevention, and power generation. Reservoir operation schemes that achieved low PCC were typically associated with large POD and moderate TPG. In particular, under fixed start and end water levels, maintaining a higher average water level during May and June could result in larger outflows, effectively inhibiting algal accumulation and bloom development, thereby leading to a lower PCC. Slight variations in average water age were found among the minimum PCC scheme, maximum TPG scheme, and minimum POD scheme, indicating that water exchange varied little and has not been responsible for the differences in PCC. Collectively, enhancing outflow was determined to play a vital role in reducing PCC, particularly when operating under constrained rules. These findings contribute new insights into optimal reservoir operations considering algal bloom control and emphasize the importance of enhancing outflow as a governing mechanism. Furthermore, the coupled model offers a transferable technical framework for reservoir managers to mitigate eutrophication through ROSs.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multi-objective Optimal Reservoir Operation
    Scola, Luis A.
    Neto, Oriane M.
    Takahashi, Ricardo H. C.
    Cerqueira, Sergio A. A. G.
    [J]. 2010 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2010,
  • [2] Multi-objective Optimal Multiple Reservoir Operation
    Scola, Luis A.
    Neto, Oriane Magela
    Takahashi, Ricardo H. C.
    Cerqueira, Sergio A. A. G.
    [J]. 2011 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2011, : 1927 - 1933
  • [3] Optimal reservoir operation using multi-objective evolutionary algorithm
    Reddy, M. Janga
    Kumar, D. Nagesh
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2006, 20 (06) : 861 - 878
  • [4] Optimal Reservoir Operation Using Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm
    M. Janga Reddy
    D. Nagesh Kumar
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2006, 20 : 861 - 878
  • [5] An Advanced Multi-Objective Ant Lion Algorithm for Reservoir Flood Control Optimal Operation
    Ning, Yawei
    Ren, Minglei
    Guo, Shuai
    Liang, Guohua
    He, Bin
    Liu, Xiaoyang
    Tang, Rong
    [J]. WATER, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [6] Research on evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective optimal operation of cascade reservoirs
    Ji, Changming
    Ma, Haoyu
    Peng, Yang
    [J]. Shuili Xuebao/Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2020, 51 (12): : 1441 - 1452
  • [7] Multi-objective Decision Model of Reservoir Flood Control Operation
    Xing, Xiaohong
    Luo, Jungang
    Xie, Jiancang
    [J]. ADVANCES IN HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2012, 212-213 : 715 - 720
  • [8] Comparison of Representative Heuristic Algorithms for Multi-Objective Reservoir Optimal Operation
    Wenzhuo Wang
    Benyou Jia
    Slobodan P. Simonovic
    Shiqiang Wu
    Ziwu Fan
    Li Ren
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2021, 35 : 2741 - 2762
  • [9] Multi-objective Optimal Operation of Combined Cascade Reservoir and Hydrogen System
    Huang, Jingsi
    Wu, Xiangyu
    Zheng, Zhijie
    Huang, Yuansheng
    Li, Wei
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS, 2022, 58 (02) : 2836 - 2847
  • [10] Comparison of Representative Heuristic Algorithms for Multi-Objective Reservoir Optimal Operation
    Wang, Wenzhuo
    Jia, Benyou
    Simonovic, Slobodan P.
    Wu, Shiqiang
    Fan, Ziwu
    Ren, Li
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2021, 35 (09) : 2741 - 2762