An Approach to Evaluating Multisector Partnerships to Support Evidence-Based Quality Improvement in Primary Care

被引:1
|
作者
McHugh, Megan [1 ]
Philbin, Sarah [2 ]
Carroll, Allison J. [3 ]
Vu, My H. [4 ]
Ciolino, Jody D. [5 ]
Maki, Bruce [6 ]
Day, Anya [7 ]
Smith, Justin D. [8 ]
Walunas, Theresa [9 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Emergency Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[2] Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Childrens Hosp Los Angeles, Feinberg Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Med & Prevent Med, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Altarum, Qual Improvement, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[7] Altarum, Proposal & Opportun Management, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[8] Univ Utah, Spencer Fox Eccles Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[9] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Med Microbiol Immunol & Prevent Med, Chicago, IL USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
HEALTH; COLLABORATIVES; COMMUNICATION; TEAMWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.01.002
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Quality improvement (QI) interventions in primary care are increasingly designed and implemented by multisector partnerships, yet little guidance exists on how to best monitor or evaluate these partnerships. The goal of this project was to describe an approach for evaluating the development and effectiveness of a multisector partnership using data from the first year of the Healthy Hearts for Michigan (HH4M) Cooperative, a multisector partnership of nine organizations tasked with designing and implementing evidence-based QI strategies for hypertension management and tobacco cessation in 50 rural primary care practices.Methods: The researchers developed a 49-item online survey focused on factors that facilitate or hinder multisector part-nerships, drawing on implementation science and partnership, engagement, and collaboration research. The team surveyed all 44 members of the HH4M Cooperative (79.5% response rate) and conducted interviews with 14 members. The inter-views focused on implementation phase-specific goals, accomplishments, and challenges. Descriptive analysis was used for the survey results, and thematic analysis for the interview data.Results: Respondents reported strong overall performance by the Cooperative during its first year, which facilitated the successful completion of several intervention design tasks. Strengths included having a clear purpose and trust and respect among members. Areas for improvement included a need for common terminology, clarification of roles and functions, and improvement in communication across workgroups. Lack of engagement from physician practices due to capacity con-straints, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, was the Cooperative's biggest challenge.Conclusion: This multimethod approach to evaluating the development and effectiveness of a multisector partnership yielded practical, actionable feedback to program leaders.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 206
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating primary care behavioral counseling interventions - An evidence-based approach
    Whitlock, EP
    Orleans, CT
    Pender, N
    Allan, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2002, 22 (04) : 267 - 284
  • [2] Impacts of evidence-based quality improvement on depression in primary care: A randomized experiment
    Rubenstein, Lisa V.
    Meredith, Lisa S.
    Parker, Louise E.
    Gordon, Nancy P.
    Hickey, Scot C.
    Oken, Carole
    Lee, Martin L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 21 (10) : 1027 - 1035
  • [3] Impacts of evidence-based quality improvement on depression in primary care a randomized experiment
    Lisa V. Rubenstein
    Lisa S. Meredith
    Louise E. Parker
    Nancy P. Gordon
    Scot C. Hickey
    Carole Oken
    Martin L. Lee
    [J]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2006, 21 : 1027 - 1035
  • [4] Evidence-based quality improvement
    Khalil, Hanan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2017, 15 (03) : 81 - 81
  • [5] Managing violence in primary care: an evidence-based approach
    Wright, NMJ
    Dixon, CAJ
    Tompkins, CNE
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2003, 53 (492): : 557 - 562
  • [6] Evidence-based medicine: A cornerstone for clinical care but not for quality improvement
    Mondoux, Shawn
    Shojania, Kaveh G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (03) : 363 - 368
  • [7] An evidence-based, structured, expert approach to selecting essential indicators of primary care quality
    Hysong, Sylvia J.
    Arredondo, Kelley
    Hughes, Ashley M.
    Lester, Houston F.
    Oswald, Frederick L.
    Petersen, Laura A.
    Woodard, LeChauncy
    Post, Edward
    DePeralta, Shelly
    Murphy, Daniel R.
    McKnight, Jason
    Nelson, Karin
    Haidet, Paul
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [8] Evidence-based quality of care
    Knottnerus, J. Andre
    Tugwell, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2010, 63 (12) : 1279 - 1280
  • [9] Initial management of dyspepsia in primary care: an evidence-based approach
    Ansari, Saqib
    Ford, Alexander C.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2013, 63 (614): : 498 - 499
  • [10] Anosmia: an evidence-based approach to diagnosis and management in primary care
    Deutsch, Peter G.
    Evans, Catherine
    Wahid, Nur Wahidah
    Amlani, Aakash D.
    Khanna, Aman
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2021, 71 (704): : 135 - 138